Service stopover

1235711

Comments

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #122

    Wot? No 'ose or did he just have letter 'O's 

    Sorry about - that I'll away and start my casserole.

  • brue
    brue Forum Participant Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #123

    No ose no...wink Rental vans are getting popular but the instructions that come with them might be lackingfrown

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #124

    Ray, nail on head...

    this concept of campers who aren't staying on a site being allowed (for a fee) to use the MHSP facilities really is a 'foreign' one to most on CT...

    However, to those who tour a little further afield the Aires category

    ACS = Aire de services sur camping acceptant le passage pour les services

    is a common one, where those who do stay and those who don't, happily coexist and use the site MHSP without any of the imagined issues being put forward in this thread.

    however, as this certainly is a 'foreign' concept, it couldn't possibly work at a uk site....undecided 

  • brue
    brue Forum Participant Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #125

    But BB the aires are often a lot smaller and you probably won't be holding others up as you might on a larger formal site. By the way many of us are used to the concept due to the other club offering the facility but I would dislike being delayed as we were recently due to extra pressure on the MHSP.

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #126

    no, it definitely DOESNT work for all on site, as I explained in my response to JVB which you either dismissed or didn't understand.

    anyone on the 'wrong' side of the MHSP (re the one way system) have to drive off in the 'wrong' direction and head all round the site to the exit and then back in and approach from the 'correct' way....and then after filling/emptying you have to drive again over the same ground (and it's a fair distance) back to the exit....needlessly adding to congestion on site.

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #127

    Since I've been named as taking part in this discussion (even though, at that point my only contribution had been a 6 word 1 liner on page 1) I will just raise a further question.

    When are these facilities to be made available? I mean, clearly it couldn't be earlier than the earliest arrival time for anyone actually arriving to stay on the site. Preferably,  it should be clear of peak arrival times (say the first 3 hours after earliest arrival) and certainly shouldn't be later than the latest arrival time of 8pm.

    So, given that there is apparently sufficient demand for this, are we to expect an influx of MHs wanting to use the service points between, say 4 and 6 pm before finding a convenient lay by to park up in for the night? laughing

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #128

    Er....i think I was referring to your post in the first page...so I included you in the list....certainly not 'thinking of you' (perish the thought) but my 'facts' are certainly correct...

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #129

    Comment removed by me as, on second thoughts, I didn't consider it worth replying to the above! frown

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #130

    A number of questions BB.

    1. How many are using this dump facility other than main site users and are main site users using the facility?

    2. Is the dump facility well within the main site and does it require supervised access and exit from the main site.

    3. If those who are not using CC sites choose to use sites which apparently include CLs and CSs according to PD (?) why should they come running to a CC site to make good the shortcomings of other options for a pittance? As far as CLs and CSs not being suitable for dumping MH waste water when did that happen? In years gone by MHs used a small waste container or a bucket if necessary - much like caravanners do. 

    There are incidentally no 'imagined issues' on this thread. Just issues.

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #131

    When are these facilities to be made available? I mean, clearly it couldn't be earlier than the earliest arrival time for anyone actually arriving to stay on the site. Preferably, it should be clear of peak arrival times (say the first 3 hours after earliest arrival) and certainly shouldn't be later than the latest arrival time of 8pm.

    Sorry to correct you Moulesy but any off site traffic needs to be on and off before wardens generally step down from manning the office (I know Fridays drag on) at 6pm. Maybe if such a provision was made it would entail arriving between 2pm and 4pm. 

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #132

    "As far as CLs and CSs not being suitable for dumping MH waste water when did that happen? In years gone by MHs used a small waste container or a bucket if necessary - much like caravanners do. "

     

    An excellent point. I've stayed on many CLs over the past few years and I'd guess almost invariably have shared the pleasure with MHers who use whatever facilities are available quite happily. Obviously there are MHers and then there are MHERS! laughing

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,149 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited April 2019 #133

    The post is question looks a bit lean on facts to me, BB.😄😄

     

    Posted on 14/04/2019 09:17 by BoleroBoy

    "I didn't see a single caravanner wild camping in 11 weeks away...

    how many do you normally see?

    i can just see the regular Caravanning posters in this discussion ( Moulesy. EasyT, Cornersready) giving sites a wide berth for a week or two's wild camping, can't you?

    Of course 'wild damping' to some might mean being a few inches from the peg "

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #134

    Well, yes, I agree, maybe I was being over generous. But surely 2pm is too close to peak arrival time. How about making it available, say, between 4 and 4:30? Can't say fairer than that really! laughing

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #135

    I read it BB but. as within one of your assumptions I dismissed it as it seems to work for most on site. However you see a possible congestion that you think sites should add to by encouraging off site users. Makes little sense to me BB

  • Navigateur
    Navigateur Club Member Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #136

     . Obviously there are MHers and then there are MHERS!

    Perhaps it is that there are (since 1969 ish) motor caravanners, and "others".

     

     

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #137

    4.30 is too late and hence why I suggested 4. We want them all off site before after work arrivals from 5.30pm on.

    I would have thought tha ton sites with 12am earliest arrival for those staying the 'rush' will have cleared before 2pm. 

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #138

    Brue, while listed as 'aires' this specific category are, in fact, just 'service usage points' at proper 'large formal' campsites.

    the campsite has a MHSP (usually conveniently placed next to the exit) and it has agreed to provide a water/dump service to passing MHs, hence the specific descriptive expression I quoted.

    they make a small charge (around €2+) and in return get a mention in the Aires directories...

    ot may well be they pick up more than passing trade with a small percentage either staying or returning to stay at some time in the future.

    it obviously pays and doesn't cause issue otherwise they wouldn't do it.

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #139

    Maybe we should just forget the whole idea then? laughing

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #140

    the 'fact' being referred to was that the three posters I mentions had all posted in this thread....they had....QED.undecided

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #141

    I think that the provision maybe required for that Very Small faction of motorhomers that can't wipe their own butt in the dark even with two hands - not for most.

  • brue
    brue Forum Participant Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #142

    BB. Well that is good as far as it goes but most of us know that at present both clubs have MHSP points in less than convenient places. Possibly due to the siting of utilities. So that's the reality when considering changes to club site offerings. Imagine somewhere like Baltic Wharf on a busy day, chaos! 

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #143

    the usual constructive input...well done, Alan....that must have been a big effort for you....undecided

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #144

    Not at all BB. But was it too much effort to answer my previous questions?

    A number of questions BB.

    1. How many are using this dump facility other than main site users and are main site users using the facility?

    2. Is the dump facility well within the main site and does it require supervised access and exit from the main site.

    3. If those who are not using CC sites choose to use sites which apparently include CLs and CSs according to PD (?) why should they come running to a CC site to make good the shortcomings of other options for a pittance? As far as CLs and CSs not being suitable for dumping MH waste water when did that happen? In years gone by MHs used a small waste container or a bucket if necessary - much like caravanners do. 

    There are incidentally no 'imagined issues' on this thread. Just issues.

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,149 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited April 2019 #145

    QED? More like ODD. 😟

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #146

    agreed, BW is in totally the wrong place, just inside the entrance as part of a. one way street that means two laps of the site for some leavers..

    but, hang on, isn't the club in the throes of 'redeveloping' the MHSP on its sites?

    i suspect this is little more than putting a grid in the same place as the old manhole cover used to be....hardly a full evaluation of traffic, location etc....

    however, about what's expected for a caravan club (Ltdundecided)

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #147

    Can someone, please explain to me how so many hundreds, maybe thousands, of MHers manage to use the facilities at CLs etc which some are claiming either don't exist or are "unsuitable" for them? undecided

  • brue
    brue Forum Participant Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #148

    Easily. laughing

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #149

    well, you'd know....wink

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,149 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited April 2019 #150

    Yep, no trouble at all, M.

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2019 #151

    but, hang on, isn't the club in the throes of 'redeveloping' the MHSP on its sites?

    Redeveloping does not mean relocating