Pop up pitches less than 6m away from caravans

TomSue
TomSue Forum Participant Posts: 76
edited August 2019 in UK Campsites & Touring #1

We we’re amazed last night to return to our pitch on the Wirral club site to find a camper van pitched between ourselves & the next hard standing pitch. Admittedly the piece of grass between us and the next pitch is larger than the normal grass border, but this camper van was not 6 m away from our van. Have spoken to the warden this morning, & he apologised & said there was nowhere else to put them & their pitch was under water. We understand the warden’s position & might well have done the same in his position. The frustrating thing is that the 6 m rule is rigidly enforced on most sites & we’ve always pitched strictly according to rules. On one site we were not  able to put our awning up because, having pitched perfectly on the peg there wasn’t enough room for our awning without going on the grass & we’d been warned on booking in that you mustn’t go on the grass. We were only there for the weekend & so managed without the awning. What we’re saying is the club make the rules, but break them themselves, even the safety ones.

«134

Comments

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,147 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited August 2019 #2

    You spoke to the warden who explained and apologised. If you’re still unhappy, the best thing is to contact the club. 

  • JillwithaJay
    JillwithaJay Club Member Posts: 2,485 ✭✭
    500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited August 2019 #3

    I can understand your annoyance; I'd definitely feel the same. 

    In this situation, a late night arrivals area could have been used in an emergency but I know this site doesn't have one.

    As in the case of flooding at York Rowntree Park, site staff would do all they can to let people know not to arrive. Other than turning the camper van away, the site staff had a difficult decision.  They could possibly have assisted in finding them an alternative site.  Maybe they explored that possibility and considered how many nights they were booked in for.    Are they still there?

    I might be inclined to contact Head Office Sites Team to mention it, as this could quite easily happen again and I doubt that the site staff would let them know that they've contravened their own rules.  

    I hope it hasn't spoiled your break.

     

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 13,867 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited August 2019 #4

    TomSue

    As far as I can see you have done everything correctly by discussing it with the warden and clearly he wasn't happy having to do it and it was good to see the conversation was constructive. I don't know the site in question but I assume the were no little cul de sac's where the motorhome could have been parked on the road? I imagine the warden would have done that had it been possible without blocking another pitch. It's obviously up to you whether you feel you want to take it further but I can't see the Club changing its general policy on spacing. There are so many variables across the network none more so than the range of pitch sizes.  I know I tend to bang on about signing up for site surveys but these surveys are an ideal way of getting views across if you don't want to go into a full blown complaint.

    David

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,430 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited August 2019 #5

    actually it is 6m between adjacent walls on your caravan or motorhome. It is 3m between any part of your outfit (awning, tents, car) so if the tent was more than 3m from any of your outfit it is within the rules.

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2019 #6

    The new arrival was a camper van and OP says less than 6m from his caravan.

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,430 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited August 2019 #7

    Opps sorry everyoneembarassedembarassed

     

  • TomSue
    TomSue Forum Participant Posts: 76
    edited August 2019 #8

    Thank you all for your comments. The said motor home left this morning & the warden took away the “pop up” peg & repaired the ruts in the grass. We totally understand his predicament, but there is so much written by the club & people on this forum about pitching correctly & how dangerous it is to pitch less than 6m away from sides of vans. We have to say that the wardens on this site are some of the nicest we’ve come across & were extremely helpful about vacant pitches when we booked in. However “rules are rules”!

  • Wherenext
    Wherenext Club Member Posts: 10,607 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited August 2019 #9

    I have stayed at the site and am wondering why a camper van could not have been accommodated in the car park area opposite the reception. It is big enough and I have never seen it full. As an emergency stop gap I would have accepted it if I was the camper van owner.

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2019 #10

    Mountain & mole hill springs to mind ..... 

  • GTP
    GTP Club Member Posts: 537
    500 Comments 100 Likes Name Dropper
    edited August 2019 #11

    As you were specifically told not to use the grass for your awning....and as the Warden has broken the club's safety rule, this is a definite email to the site team at HO.

    Further there could have been an issue with insurance claims, if heaven forbid, a fire had occurred.  Who would have been held responsible..

     

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2019 #12

    As the OP was talking about a previously used site with regard to awning that is water under the bridge. There would have been no issue with insurance claims. 

  • TomSue
    TomSue Forum Participant Posts: 76
    edited August 2019 #13

    Re MollyMummy reply.  From the club point of view If safety is a mole hill it’s the club making the mountain.

  • GTP
    GTP Club Member Posts: 537
    500 Comments 100 Likes Name Dropper
    edited August 2019 #14

    I stand corrected..thank you ET.

    However the second sentence does state the camper van was less than 6m away from the side their van....The risk issue is still valid..

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2019 #15

    The risk issue (although minimal) is an issue. I say 'minimal' only because not many of us have had an adjacent caravan in flames. 

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,147 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited August 2019 #16

    It would be interesting to know if 'less than 6m' means 5.8m or 3.2m. The actual figure could put a different perspective on things. 

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2019 #17

    why?

    if I was to move a peg a 'short distance' to one side would it matter what that short distance was?

    if we have a rule that's 6m then I guess it's 6m.

    what I find interesting is how fire prevention requires a 6m gap in one direction yet only 3m in another, irrespective of wind or other factors.

  • Navigateur
    Navigateur Club Member Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2019 #18

    Another habitation unit within 6m is a Hazard.   The Risk is that of it going on fire.

  • MikeyA
    MikeyA Forum Participant Posts: 1,072
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2019 #19

    If both caravans had end kitchens then surely you would still need 6m end to end.

  • Navigateur
    Navigateur Club Member Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2019 #20

     I don't follow the end kitchen idea.  Give a fire in a caravan a couple of minutes and it will all be well alight, wherever the kitchen might be.

    Was there not an article on the web about a year ago where it was claimed most caravan fire were electrical in origin?

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2019 #21

    or even end bedrooms, surely?

    or even two MH cab to cab?

    or.....

    it does make you think why it isn't 6m all round....although the answer is certainly a compromise that allows sites to retain a 'fair number' of pitches despite being cognicent of the fire risks...

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,430 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited August 2019 #22

    it is more to prevent it spreading not preventing a fire in itself BB.

    remember those pics of a fire at a club site? The outfits either side of a completely ruined caravan only had minor damage (including a car I seem to remember and awnings have a low fire loading anyway) but were largely intact.

    The 6m/3m rule or guideline is given by the fire services not thought up by the club, I would imagine they know what they are doing.

  • Wellys and Mac
    Wellys and Mac Forum Participant Posts: 447
    100 Comments
    edited August 2019 #23

    Well done the warden!

    On such pop up sites run by the CMC, I think the caravan show site is one example, the 6 metre rule can be ignored and is, so I think for a limited stay as in this case, although unexpected taking everything into account I see no reason for complaint, just one of those things that now and again happens.

    Rather than complain, more seek information?

     

     

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2019 #24

    "so I think for a limited stay as in this case, although unexpected taking everything into account I see no reason for complaint, just one of those things that now and again happens."

    Couldn't agree more! Bit like a boiler breaking down and being out of action for a day,  eh, W? laughing

  • Wellys and Mac
    Wellys and Mac Forum Participant Posts: 447
    100 Comments
    edited August 2019 #25

    Yes 👍

    As if the sky is going to fall down! 🐓

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,430 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited August 2019 #26

    I wish the site would be named, a few have asked and it would be useful for other members planning to use it if it is still having problems.

  • MikeyA
    MikeyA Forum Participant Posts: 1,072
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2019 #27

    The 6m distance probably refers to separation distance from a  point of ignition. Typical side kitchen vans will still achieve 6m even using 3m end to end. However end kitchen vans will not.

  • Wellys and Mac
    Wellys and Mac Forum Participant Posts: 447
    100 Comments
    edited August 2019 #28

    Well if a pitch is out of action  wouldnt that reduction then be reflected in availability?

    I'm thinking it's no longer an issue, but if so, doesnt a site start phoning members due to arrive?

    If site full  last person booked on, phoned to say weather forces cancellation perhaps?

     

  • Wellys and Mac
    Wellys and Mac Forum Participant Posts: 447
    100 Comments
    edited August 2019 #29

    It's in legislation, I did have all of the bumf  but changed computers t'other year and I always destroy hard drives, so alas gone.

    Its Google able 

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,430 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited August 2019 #30

    no burt it is the minimum distance between any adjacent wall or either a caravan or or MH, and three meters between any part of your outfit (car, awning, tent).

    Post edit found a copy: http://www.westyorksfire.gov.uk/uploads/assets/sitepoint/pan/fireProtection-FS/FS-PAN006-CaravanSites.pdf

  • MikeyA
    MikeyA Forum Participant Posts: 1,072
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2019 #31

    I've never seen a wall burst into flames!

    I still thought that caravans back to back only required 3m separation.