Best MHSP Ever - Should CAMC Follow Suit?

MichaelT
MichaelT Forum Participant Posts: 1,874
1000 Comments
edited July 2017 in UK Campsites & Touring #1

Recently on a site in SW France and arrived and had to dump waste and fill up (even though each pitch had a tap) so went to the MHSP which was situated next to the Camping Car pitches and was amazed at how good it was.  Well laid out, the grid went down the centre of the area front to back with the concrete sloping into it so no need to align the dump valve with the grid, toilet waste and fresh water, even had a doggy wash along side if needed.  Best of all (sad I know) it doubled as a wash bay so after a couple of dusty weeks by the Med it was nice to get the crud off and give the van a quick wash.

Pictures below but just think the CAMC should aspire to this level of facility if it is to be all inclusive of caravanners and motorhomers.  And TBH the services on Aires are superior to most of the current offerings by the club.

«1345

Comments

  • Unknown
    Unknown Forum Participant
    edited July 2017 #2
    The user and all related content has been Deleted User
  • MichaelT
    MichaelT Forum Participant Posts: 1,874
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #3

    Yes David

  • Unknown
    Unknown Forum Participant
    edited July 2017 #4
    The user and all related content has been Deleted User
  • peedee
    peedee Club Member Posts: 9,392 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited July 2017 #5

    The Club is embarking (slowly) on an upgrade program of motorhome service points. I have not see one yet but someone, maybe DK posted a picture of one at Seacroft. 

    Here is another pitcture of a well maintained good one.

    peedee

     

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 13,872 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited July 2017 #6

    I think the new standard of Club motorhome facilities are as equally as good as the one illustrated. But as Peedee  suggests progress is pretty slow at getting them all up to standard.

    David

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #7

    the best designed ones are the simplest....

    as Michael has alluded to, no fancy lift up (heavy, awkward) covers, just a reliance on gravity to gently ease the water away.

    even a crap 'liner-upper' like me can get the waste pipe within the 20'x10' landing area.

    it really is the difference between being a pleasure (piece of cake) to use, and a pain.....shunting about, bad back, skinned knuckles etc...

    one of the best ive seen/used is the MHSP at Halliotis, Pontorson, nr Mont St Michel.....its so good they put in two of them, side by side, complete with their own CCEP.

    mind you, this MHSP 'pays for itself' as non-residents can call in for a dump/refillwink for a small fee of around €2-€3.

    i realise the club has made its position clear on (not) allowing something similar, but at least they could base their MHSPs on the best....

  • MichaelT
    MichaelT Forum Participant Posts: 1,874
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #8

    But you still have to line the waste water valve over the grid whereas if the grid was longitudinal to the van and the concrete sloped accordingly you just need to be in the vicinity...

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #9

    exactly my point, Michael. the club have gone beyond the simple requirement of a gently sloping rectangle (which works beautifully all over Europe) and will still force MHers to do the 'shuffle' to get lined up with their grids.

    any van coming towards the camera with a dump valve on the left hand (near) side of the van, will need to ease over a couple of feet to the right to ensure its over the grid (which looks to be a good 2' too narrow, certainly on the nearside) which will push the van into the roadway...

  • Bakers2
    Bakers2 Forum Participant Posts: 8,199 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited July 2017 #10

    I don't think this particular one is too hard to line up with. Southport has a choice of 3 places in the MSP everyone of them has a manhole cover.  There isn't a CDP and as I understand it's not all that old 😢. Manhole covers are heavy and very awkward can't removed til you're certain you won't drop a wheel down. Can't get over because of lifting said cover and all of them on a level surface so no gravity assistance. Then you need to rinse the area and chase the odd pea or sweetcorn until you can get it to and down the drain 😂. Only room for one vehicle, just by the exit so a queue forms - on the road blocking the exit LOL. Good planning - I think not!

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #11

    So for those that can't drop a golf ball into a bucket we need sloped concrete areas. 

  • harryb
    harryb Forum Participant Posts: 1,536
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #12

    Have seen this type of drain double up as a car washing area. I suppose it's a way of keeping it clean

  • Navigateur
    Navigateur Club Member Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #13

    You said it, BB !!

    even a crap 'liner-upper' like me can get the waste pipe within the 20'x10' landing area.

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #14

    interesting analogy Alan, i assure ypu i can drop a golf ball pretty well anywhere you want me too.....anytime you want to put your money up, let me knowwink

    however, we are talking about the design of MHSP, no doubt a subject you're an expert on, owning a caravan?undecided

    the point is, its as easy to build a well designed MHSP as a poorly designed one.....its the design that needs to be right.....and for the club to spend money building badly designed MHSP just makes it all the more frustrating.

    isntt it about making them easy to use, speeding up throughput and reducing incomvenience to other users?

    perhaps ive missed the point?undecided

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 13,872 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited July 2017 #15

    I have posted another view of it below. Quite frankly if you can't line a motorhome waste over that grill I am not sure they should be driving a motorhome? 

    David

     

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #16

    Has anyone had experience  of how the ccc do "m/v dumps"?

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 13,872 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited July 2017 #17

    One I prepared earlier for you!!! This is the Canterbury Site which is similar to other C&CC sites I have visited.

    David

     

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #18

    but why are the two covered drains set wider apart than the open drain?

    the two covered drains are no improvement whatsoever on what we have now...

    the 'improvement' of the open grill would be far better if the surrounding area were sloping, or the grill was wide enough so that solo drivers could be confident that they are parked 'in the target zone'...irrespective of which side the waste tap is.

     

     

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #19

    yes, the open grille is an improvement over a closed drain, but this is really no better/different than the cc one.

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #20

    As I might have mentioned before if motor caravan manufacturers used their products and realised just how stupididly most outlets were designed then it would not be the "problem" some find,

    Fuel tanker and "Honey Wagon" also RV manufacturers  seem to have it sorted

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #21

    irrespective of whether the outlet is right, left or centre, if the drain being targetted is either too small or covered or both, getting things lined up needs to be made as easy as possible, not the other way round. 

    why doesnt the CC sites committee get out there in a MH (in fact, several different MHs now that we are all MH focused.....)and test out a decent MHSP (as described by Michael in the OP) against one of their own 'creations'....

    BTW, as youve mentioned it umpteen times, why dont you describe to us all how the MH manufacturers should design their 'stupid' dump valves...

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #22

    Have you ever seen a fuel tanker,  honey wagon or RV empty  their tanks ? Look and learn ,I did and modified our motor caravan to be user friendy very simple mod ,but then?

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #23

    if you mean the adding of a short flexible hose extension, i have one (OEM) and i use it.....but only on CC sites where the MHSP are hopeless.

    on a well designed one, pull up anywhere within the sloping area, pull the handle (no need to get out with a decent internal frost protected system)  and the water goes down the drain....amazing.

    its all in the design you know, not that difficult but the club still hasnt mastered it..undecided

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #24

    But why should sites any where have to spend large amounts of money to get round what should be rectified at source i.e. the poor design of the motor caravan waste outlets 

  • magnet
    magnet Forum Participant Posts: 157
    edited July 2017 #25

    in June on treamble valley club site a motorhome person opposite us found a new place to empty his grey waste on the pitch and up the road as he pulled away. the smell was so bad the wife and I had to wash it all down with disinfectant and water .so it looks like the club would waste its money on updates for motorhomes. yes we did complain

  • Navigateur
    Navigateur Club Member Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #26

    Why would getting a 2" or thereby pipe over a 12" square grid/hole be more difficult than getting a caravan within 2" if a wooden peg?

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #27

    The grids are hardly that small though.

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #28

    As I mentioned on another post ,the wardeness on the site we were on last night was having a "conversation"about just that with a motor caravan "owner/driver"who had the dump valve open while standing "fumbling"for his barrier card to exit the site,and she said it is getting more prvelant with the increase in motor caravans and those who cannot "spare the time"to empty on the proper point

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #29

    its interesting that those who have the answer to everything MHSP related are caravanners who use wastemasters.undecided

    JVB excepted, who has bags of honey wagon experience....undecided

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #30

    the majority are covered at the moment. and this is a serious issue for those who have to lift them....

    the point Michael makes is, if they are to be resigned, why not do it to the std of the best ones (like the one he highlights), rather than a 'that will do' approach?

    ps, where did you want to play? at a course nr you or down here somewhere?wink

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2017 #31

    Maybe it needs to be 3 times the size David laughing