Covid Madness -

1535456585963

Comments

  • Compo
    Compo Forum Participant Posts: 324
    100 Comments
    edited November 2020 #1652

    I'm sure a lot of them will be pleased to have a job to go back to. It's forecast that there will be lots of jobs lost in the retail industry in the near future.

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2020 #1653

    Not  just the retail industry Compo.

  • nelliethehooker
    nelliethehooker Club Member Posts: 13,644 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited November 2020 #1654

    As has been said, very difficult to police this "no socialising indoors", so over Christmas there would be millions up and down the country enjoying a turkey lunch together, regardless of rules and regulations.

    I agree, Rufs, the government's are just being pragmatic, realising whatever they did there would still be fast numbers of families gathering together. However the sensible ones will stick to the distancing rules as they realise by doing so they will help to reduce the infection rate.

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2020 #1655

    I am sure many will be glad of employment ,but is going to be at the expense of the good work that has ,over many years been done by the TUs to give employees a good working enviroment,and living wage for the unsocial hours that will be expected of themundecided

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2020 #1656

    Yes, but it's not the sensible ones we should be concerned about really!  frown

  • Compo
    Compo Forum Participant Posts: 324
    100 Comments
    edited November 2020 #1657

    I agree, things are likely to be difficult in the future, however there are many people who find it suits them better to work what you call unsocial hours. 

  • nelliethehooker
    nelliethehooker Club Member Posts: 13,644 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited November 2020 #1658

    As you agree with what I've said, but have been critical of the very idea of there being a 5 day relaxation of the restriction, what would you have had the governments do? They are between a rock and a hard place on this issue. Either they keep the restrictions in place and, as I said, very many families would just ignore them completely, then the Govs would have to police all households to catch those breaking the rules, or do we they have done and ease them, hoping that there will be less mixing than it they had kept them in place.

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2020 #1659

    Sorry Nellie,  but on this I only agree with you in as much as that the government are in a very difficult position, as they have been throughout.  But the more I hear Michael Gove telling all MPs that they all need to take responsibility and Matt Hancock telling us that the lockdown worked but now is not the time to let our guard down, the more I despair of their decision to allow a 5 day free for all over Christmas.

    They keep praising the vast majority of the population who have made such sacrifices throughout this awful pandemic, yet they don't seem willing to trust them to do the same over the Christmas period. (And what will happen over the New Year weekend?)  Only time will tell of course, but I fear this decision will lead to a deterioration in January and February. Is that a price worth paying in the long run?

  • nelliethehooker
    nelliethehooker Club Member Posts: 13,644 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited November 2020 #1660

    I agree that there is bound to be a rebound of cases in the New Year but I think whatever they had done would have resulted in that. The only way to stop it from happening is for them to impose a complete lockdown and travel ban nationwide, and that would have gone down well with the vast majority wouldn't it, as well as bankrupting both the leisure and retail industries, and it's bad enough as it is?

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2020 #1661

    Yes, it's certainly bad. But the vast majority have been praised for sticking to the rules all the way through so why think they will suddenly let themselves down now?  And the 5 day free for all will surely have relatively little benefit for the retail and leisure industries given that, as far as I can see, the restrictions will still apply to them anyway?

  • TomL
    TomL Forum Participant Posts: 763
    edited November 2020 #1662

    No!

  • cyberyacht
    cyberyacht Forum Participant Posts: 10,218
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2020 #1663

    On the third day of Christmas the Government gave to me

    Three restrictive tiers

    Two swab tests

    and a temperature of forty point three

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2020 #1664

    What could well turn out to be 2 months of restrictions to prepare and recover from 5 days does not seem any better for the country. There are things that governments could have done to lessen the likely damage such as only allowing one existing bubble to mix, limiting the number of adults more on any one day. Some would ignore, some would not. I notice that one statement from England referred to the number that can 'safely ' get together when we know that for most there is no really safe number. We know that 4 adults is safer than 14 however. 

  • Unknown
    Unknown Forum Participant
    edited December 2020 #1665
    The user and all related content has been Deleted User
  • Takethedogalong
    Takethedogalong Forum Participant Posts: 17,046 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited December 2020 #1666

    Just reading a bit about those who might choose not to have the vaccine when it’s available, (not those who are medically exempt)

    Personally, I support restricting activities and services for those who decide not to have it. Some minds need focussing on what’s best for the majority, rather than believing a load of tripe read online. World needs to co operate on this one........

     

  • Rufs
    Rufs Club Member Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2020 #1667

    there will be millions who will adhere to the letter of the law, and also take responsible precautions within their own households to ensure they are as safe as possible, likewise their will be millions who will adhere to the letter of the law but will blow care to the wind.

    The same same would have applied if restrictions had not been lifted, millions up and down the country who would have blown care to the wind.

    no matter which way the governments of the various nations cut and dice it, people will make their own choices especially during festive occasions such as Christmas, and no amount of policing will stop this.

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2020 #1669

    And as the Patients at Hull hospital said when interviewed "i did not think it would be so bad for our age undecided"

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2020 #1670

    "no matter which way the governments of the various nations cut and dice it, people will make their own choices especially during festive occasions such as Christmas, and no amount of policing will stop this."

    I don't follow this line of reasoning - "people" have, by and large, not been making their own choices throughout this awful time but have been, possibly reluctantly, following the instructions given by the government - why should you think we will suddenly turn into a nation of law breakers now? And quite apart from that, millions in this country have not been able to celebrate their own festive occasions - there hasn't been any mass law breaking amongst their communities as far as I can see.

    OK, go for it,  have all the family round for Christmas, and if,  God forbid, the virus returns in January and you lose a loved one, will you still think it was a price worth paying? (That's a general question, not aimed specifically at you, Rufs. )

  • Rufs
    Rufs Club Member Posts: 4,072 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2020 #1671

    OK, go for it, have all the family round for Christmas, and if, God forbid, the virus returns in January and you lose a loved one, will you still think it was a price worth paying? (That's a general question, not aimed specifically at you, Rufs. )

    Share your sentiments, however, people wont be coming to our bungalow, nobody has been inside our bungalow since all this began, garden yes, inside no, we have even used the caravan loo as a covid free zone.

    We will be going to my daughters, and they have all had Covid, daughter is a practice nurse, son in law is a doctor, 3 gkids are teenagers, and i occasionally carry out Gparent child minding duties round their place, so fingers crossed all should be ok laughing

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,427 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited December 2020 #1672

    no matter which way the governments of the various nations cut and dice it, people...

    I think you mean some people?

    But that is true of any rule or law, some people always think it does not apply to them.

    Personally I think the majority will abide by the laws/rules/guidelines.

  • Rocky 2 buckets
    Rocky 2 buckets Forum Participant Posts: 7,101
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2020 #1673

    The case of Hull is very sad, after the 1st lockdown Hull received plaudits from both Govt ministers & the Health care leaders for such low figures then within 2months they’d topped Manchester & Nottingham🤷🏻‍♂️. It don’t matter where the major conurbations are the fact is there is way too many ignorers of the science.

  • Compo
    Compo Forum Participant Posts: 324
    100 Comments
    edited December 2020 #1674

    Hope they have some good security in place and everyone sticks to the covid rules tomorrow when Debenhams opens for their "fire sale". I for one will only be witnessing it from my armchair by the fireside. !!

  • Unknown
    Unknown Forum Participant
    edited December 2020 #1675
    The user and all related content has been Deleted User
  • brue
    brue Forum Participant Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2020 #1677

    When Beales closed this year I felt the same, especially for the staff. That was our one local department store. Our nearest Debenhams is over twenty miles away and it was a good store. 

    When the shops open tomorrow we'll only have Primark and M&S left, however with the prospect of 24 hour opening over the next few weeks "covid madness" will no doubt thrive once more.

  • LLM
    LLM Forum Participant Posts: 1,555 ✭✭
    500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited December 2020 #1678

    Pretty much spot on Tammygirl.  I also think you are lucky up there to have wee Krankie, a.k.a. wee Burney, Nicky Fish, Nicola Sturgeon laughing.  She has IMO done a better job than dear Boris.  

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2020 #1679

    She was very much on the back foot in the two interviews i saw this last weekend,undecided

  • Tammygirl
    Tammygirl Club Member Posts: 7,957 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited December 2020 #1680

    Pretty much spot on Tammygirl. I also think you are lucky up there to have wee Krankie, a.k.a. wee Burney, Nicky Fish, Nicola Sturgeon laughing. She has IMO done a better job than dear Boris.

    undecided might look it at times but its easy to sit back and wait for others to make the first move.

  • Tammygirl
    Tammygirl Club Member Posts: 7,957 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited December 2020 #1681

    Didn't she just, laughing she's deserves it most of the time. 

    Better say no more as I will get into bother laughing