Cycles on site

17891113

Comments

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #302

    Not there as a safety related issue as at the most the vehicle speed is 5 mph, a brisk walking pace so giving plenty of time to make visual contact and achieve the stopping distance. Just not viable for traffic management.



    How many cars can you honestly say drive around sites at 5mph.  I only saw 1 on a recent stay at a CC site and that was mine much to the annoyance of the vehicles following us.

    ..+1

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #303

    Not there as a safety related issue as at the most the vehicle speed is 5 mph, a brisk walking pace so giving plenty of time to make visual contact and achieve the stopping distance. Just not viable for traffic management.



    How many cars can you honestly say drive around sites at 5mph.  I only saw 1 on a recent stay at a CC site and that was mine much to the annoyance of the vehicles following us.

    I do my best to Cool

  • SteveL
    SteveL Club Member Posts: 12,311 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited September 2016 #304

    Surely our sites one-way system is only there to facilitate on site traffic flow?

    Not there as a safety related issue as at the most the vehicle speed is 5 mph, a brisk walking pace so giving plenty of time to make visual contact and achieve the stopping distance. Just not viable for traffic management.

    I have not the slightest hang up cycling what is being suggested as the wrong way round just in the same conceptual way as I would walk the wrong way round without giving it another thought. There will be enough room to pass or facilitate
    by moving aside for a vehicle moving towards me without issues. But then I am a person still both able to see and be aware of what I am doing, when those are gone I doubt I will be driving to tow there anyway.

    Trouble is children see an adult doing it and think it is OK and permitted. However, because they are kids they tend to do it a lot faster. It is the same principle as on a pedestrian crossing if young children are present, it is always best to wait for
    the green man, even if there is no car in sight.

  • IanH
    IanH Forum Participant Posts: 4,708
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #305

    Could I ask - why do parents (well, certainly a few that post on here) seem to have such a big problem with taking their kids somewhere suitable to play and to learn how to ride their bikes?

    Why do they see it as necessary for their kids to ride round and round on site roads (which are not play areas) and often at speed and in the wrong direction?

    Is it all too much trouble for you to take them somewhere more suitable?

    Do you ever, for a moment, consider the impact on others? Or is just you that matters?

    I've not yet seen an answer to this.

    Would one of those parents who are happy to send their kids off around the site to play, care to offer a reply?

  • ocsid
    ocsid Forum Participant Posts: 1,395
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #306

    Not there as a safety related issue as at the most the vehicle speed is 5 mph, a brisk walking pace so giving plenty of time to make visual contact and achieve the stopping distance. Just not viable for traffic management.



    How many cars can you honestly say drive around sites at 5mph.  I only saw 1 on a recent stay at a CC site and that was mine much to the annoyance of the vehicles following us.

    You have it there in a nutshell, the biggest offenders here are really the ignorant car drivers, few of these will be kids.

     

  • Oneputt
    Oneputt Club Member Posts: 9,145 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #307

    We don't stay on many main CC sites but those we have we've never had a problem with children playing or riding their bikes, I just wish that parents of toddlers (up to 5 years old) wouldn't leave them unsupervised!  Commercial sites are an entirely different
    matter, they really do have problems

  • SteveL
    SteveL Club Member Posts: 12,311 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited September 2016 #308

    Not there as a safety related issue as at the most the vehicle speed is 5 mph, a brisk walking pace so giving plenty of time to make visual contact and achieve the stopping distance. Just not viable for traffic management.



    How many cars can you honestly say drive around sites at 5mph.  I only saw 1 on a recent stay at a CC site and that was mine much to the annoyance of the vehicles following us.

    You have it there in a nutshell, the biggest offenders here are really the ignorant car drivers, few of these will be kids.

     

    Even with the car doing the speed limit. If a child is going the wrong way at 10 mph, probably a conservative figure, the
    closing speed is 22 feet per second. Throw in the odd hedge obstructing sight lines, and you can perhaps see why cycles are ask to follow the one way system.

  • ocsid
    ocsid Forum Participant Posts: 1,395
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #309

    Even with the car doing the speed limit. If a child is going the wrong way at 10 mph, probably a conservative figure, the closing speed is 22 feet per second. Throw in the odd hedge obstructing sight lines, and you can perhaps see why cycles are ask to follow the one way system.

    Exactly the same as a kid cycling the right way round at 10 mph meeting a walker or disabled cart going the wrong way round at 5 mph; or  a car at the typical speeds we see, meeting the walker or cart. What needs instilling is acting responsibly and most important being aware, and it is not only for the kids to learn.

    As said I don't see any greater problem or difference in risk between cycling, walking or the use of a cart within the site in the opposite direction to the vehicular traffic flow. 

  • SteveL
    SteveL Club Member Posts: 12,311 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited September 2016 #310

    Even with the car doing the speed limit. If a child is going the wrong way at 10 mph, probably a conservative figure, the closing speed is 22 feet per second. Throw in the odd hedge obstructing sight lines, and you can perhaps see why cycles are ask to follow the one way system.

    Exactly the same as a kid cycling the right way round at 10 mph meeting a walker or disabled cart going the wrong way round at 5 mph; or  a car at the typical speeds we see, meeting the walker or cart. What needs instilling is acting responsibly and most important being aware, and it is not only for the kids to learn.

    As said I don't see any greater problem or difference in risk between cycling, walking or the use of a cart within the site in the opposite direction to the vehicular traffic flow. 

    I am afraid I fail to see your logic. You are going against the laid down site rules, which say that bikes should follow the one way system, and that is acting responsibly.   I do agree it is not only for kids to learn though.

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,404 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #311

    "How many cars can you honestly say drive around sites at 5mph.  I only saw 1 on a recent stay at a CC site and that was mine much to the annoyance of the vehicles following us."



    That's very true. I said earlier in the thread that in our, admittedly limited, stays on CC sites cars travelling well in excess of 5 mph is by far a more common sight than children cycling around like lunatics (although we don't use CC sites in school
    holidays) but according to others it's not a problem! 

  • toowetforcamping
    toowetforcamping Forum Participant Posts: 42
    edited September 2016 #312

     You are going against the laid down site rules, 

    Steve L and others

    I'm just trying to get a feel of the CC members mentality - 

    Do you believe that adhering to the Site Rules is the be all and end all even when they may be illogical because the Club says you have to?

     

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,404 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #313

     You are going against the laid down site rules, 

    Steve L and others

    I'm just trying to get a feel of the CC members mentality - 

    Do you believe that adhering to the Site Rules is the be all and end all even when they may be illogical because the Club says you have to?

     

    Well, I do think it's fair enough to say that if you choose to use CC sites you should know exactly what to expect as far as (current) rules are concerned. And, yes, they should apply to all site users.

    If you can't or don't want to stick to those rules then don't use CC sites, but be careful what you wish for, because as far as I can see many other sites have just as many rules - and having walked through Haven Perran Sands the other day - I'd say they're
    flouted far more commonly than on CC sites! Sad

  • ocsid
    ocsid Forum Participant Posts: 1,395
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #314

     

    I am afraid I fail to see your logic. You are going against the laid down site rules, which say that bikes should follow the one way system, and that is acting responsibly.   I do agree it is not only for kids to learn though.

    You could be right but not in those currently being published on line.

    These however whilst not having such a rule, do have as thier leading statement "Please drive your vehicle with particular consideration for pedestrians, including children and other vulnerable road users, who have priority over vehicles on our sites' roads."

    Yes, I do think I act responsibly, and within the rules it seems.

    Pasting directly from the clubs rule's:

    13 Site roads
    a. Please drive your vehicle with particular consideration for pedestrians, including children and other vulnerable road users, who have priority over vehicles on our sites' roads. You must have a full current driving licence, insurance for the vehicle driven and follow the principles of road safety. Cars and motorhomes must have a valid road fund licence. Vehicle speeds should not exceed walking pace (5mph) and one way systems should be followed at all times. Please remember that other members' pitches are strictly "no-go" areas.

    b. Bicycles, skateboards, scooters and roller skates are allowed on sites although, of course, consideration should be shown to other visitors. No cycling or skating is permitted on site between the hours of dusk and dawn, as determined by the Site Staff. Please observe any no cycling signs on site, such as around toilet blocks, and ensure that children are supervised at all times. Remember that the principles of road safety should be observed and special care should be taken when cycling onto and off roadways. Please ask the Site Staff about designated cycle routes nearby.

  • SteveL
    SteveL Club Member Posts: 12,311 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited September 2016 #315

     

    I am afraid I fail to see your logic. You are going against the laid down site rules, which say that bikes should follow the one way system, and that is acting responsibly.   I do agree it is not only for kids to learn though.

    You could be right but not in those currently being published on line.

    These however whilst not having such a rule, do have as thier leading statement "Please drive your vehicle with particular consideration for pedestrians, including children and other vulnerable road users, who have priority over vehicles on our sites' roads."

    Yes, I do think I act responsibly, and within the rules it seems.

    Pasting directly from the clubs rule's:

    13 Site roads
    a. Please drive your vehicle with particular consideration for pedestrians, including children and other vulnerable road users, who have priority over vehicles on our sites' roads. You must have a full current driving licence, insurance for the vehicle driven and follow the principles of road safety. Cars and motorhomes must have a valid road fund licence. Vehicle speeds should not exceed walking pace (5mph) and one way systems should be followed at all times. Please remember that other members' pitches are strictly "no-go" areas.

    b. Bicycles, skateboards, scooters and roller skates are allowed on sites although, of course, consideration should be shown to other visitors. No cycling or skating is permitted on site between the hours of dusk and dawn, as determined by the Site Staff. Please observe any no cycling signs on site, such as around toilet blocks, and ensure that children are supervised at all times. Remember that the principles of road safety should be observed and special care should be taken when cycling onto and off roadways. Please ask the Site Staff about designated cycle routes nearby.

    By any standard definition a bycycle is a vehicle. 

    "any means in or by which someone travels or something is carried or conveyed; a means of conveyance or transport:"

    However, even if this is disputed, 13b states that the principles of road safety should be observed. Would you cycle the wrong way up a one way street, or get off and walk" I thought we had established that camp site roads are not play areas.


  • SteveL
    SteveL Club Member Posts: 12,311 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited September 2016 #316

     You are going against the laid down site rules, 

    Steve L and others

    I'm just trying to get a feel of the CC members mentality - 

    Do you believe that adhering to the Site Rules is the be all and end all even when they may be illogical because the Club says you have to?

     

    Well, I do think it's fair enough to say that if you choose to use CC sites you should know exactly what to expect as far as (current) rules are concerned. And, yes, they should apply to all site users.

    If you can't or don't want to stick to those rules then don't use CC sites, but be careful what you wish for, because as far as I can see many other sites have just as many rules - and having walked through Haven Perran Sands the other day - I'd say they're
    flouted far more commonly than on CC sites! Sad

    My thoughts exactly M.

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #317

     ..... Would you cycle the wrong way up a one way street, ....




    Many do Innocent same as they obey red traffic lights

  • Rocky 2 buckets
    Rocky 2 buckets Forum Participant Posts: 7,101
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #318

    Ocsid, good salient point you have in bold, the onus is on Adults, some Children are still learning to ride a bike, it's lunacy to expect them to understand the minutiae of the Highway Code.

  • ocsid
    ocsid Forum Participant Posts: 1,395
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #319

    Oh dear we will now have to include those Aquarolls, Wastemasters, shopping trail alongs, disabled carts,  pushchairs and me pushing a wheel chair. I doubt many other than yourself will be going round the whole circlular route to comply to the letter rather than going  back and forth Wink

  • cyberyacht
    cyberyacht Forum Participant Posts: 10,218
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #320

    Perhaps one-way systems add to the hazard. If there were two way traffic, would people be more circumspect?

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #321

    Perhaps one-way systems add to the hazard. If there were two way traffic, would people be more circumspect?

    Agreed ..... same reasoning that in some places ALL road sign have been removed to create a free for all, which makes us all think a bit more

  • mbee1
    mbee1 Forum Participant Posts: 557
    500 Comments
    edited September 2016 #322

    On most sites the roads are not wide enough for two way traffic though.

  • SteveL
    SteveL Club Member Posts: 12,311 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited September 2016 #323

    Oh dear we will now have to include those Aquarolls, Wastemasters, shopping trail alongs, disabled carts,  pushchairs and me pushing a wheel chair. I doubt many other than yourself will be going round the whole circlular route to comply to the letter rather than going  back and forth Wink

    Not seen many of those doing 10 mph+

    However, in respect of bikes, I think it is incumbent us adults to set a good example. Can't remember if it was on this thread or the other, but there was a video posted showing a young girl comming round a blind corner and riding straight into a car. Just consider the poor parents who are having to explain to there offspring, as you cycle past. "Why can't I go that way round, that person is"

  • SteveL
    SteveL Club Member Posts: 12,311 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited September 2016 #324

    Perhaps one-way systems add to the hazard. If there were two way traffic, would people be more circumspect?

    You make a good point. However, at the moment they should be one way and it would be safer if vehicles observed this.

  • toowetforcamping
    toowetforcamping Forum Participant Posts: 42
    edited September 2016 #325

    On most sites the roads are not wide enough for two way traffic though.

    In that case it needs traffic lights  Happy

  • toowetforcamping
    toowetforcamping Forum Participant Posts: 42
    edited September 2016 #326

    Would you cycle the wrong way up a one way street, or get off and walk"

    This is legal in many towns in France, Germany and Holland

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,155 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited September 2016 #327

    Would you cycle the wrong way up a one way street, or get off and walk"

    This is legal in many towns in France, Germany and Holland

    But this is about CC sites, isn't it? Laughing

  • toowetforcamping
    toowetforcamping Forum Participant Posts: 42
    edited September 2016 #328

    Would you cycle the wrong way up a one way street, or get off and walk"

    This is legal in many towns in France, Germany and Holland

    But this is about CC sites, isn't it? Laughing

    SteveL started it!  Happy

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,155 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited September 2016 #329

    Would you cycle the wrong way up a one way street, or get off and walk"

    This is legal in many towns in France, Germany and Holland

    But this is about CC sites, isn't it? Laughing

    SteveL started it!  Happy

    And you needed little encouragement WinkLaughing

  • huskydog
    huskydog Club Member Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #330

    i think i would rather have a child cycle towards me ,knowing i'm there ,than going in the same direction  wobbling about in front of me and then realise i'm there and panic and could fall off..................

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #331

    Would you cycle the wrong way up a one way street, or get off and walk"

    This is legal in many towns in France, Germany and Holland

    ...They are much wider roads as they are in Cambrdge