Autumn Watch 2023 - cancelled
Not only is Chris Packham taking a break from his T.V. exposure, but the BBC has decided to cancell Autumnwatch and halve the length of Winterwatch 2024 ! in the latest Ratings Row.
Comments
-
I have always been a staunch supporter of the BBC but some of the decisions it has made recently have got me starting to doubt that loyalty. We used to have our own local news from a studio in in Cambridge but that has been gone back to Norwich and our region hardly gets a mention now!
David
2 -
I'm finding BBC News has declined. Too much padding about "Deirdre who has swum the length of the Serpentine for a transgender dog charity" or some such. I'm often tending to dip into Sky or Al Jazeera now.
3 -
I stopped watching it years ago despite my love of nature.
Too much "Jolly Hockey Sticks" and Patronising for my liking.
If I'm going to watch anything I'd watch Iolo's programme on BBC Wales.
Quite surprising to find so much commonality in the responses.
6 -
Big fan of all the " watches" and will miss Autumn Watch. Think the BBC have made some bad decisions recently.
We too have lost of local news program from Oxford, to be replaced with news from Southampton 🥺
1 -
The problem is they now film in an area where public access is very restricted. When they filmed at Minsmere it was fascinating to watch the camera people at work and they would, wherever possible engage with the public.
I just have no trust in BBC news and haven’t watched it for years, most of my news comes from the internet
1 -
I won't watch anything in which Chris Packham appears - as a matter of principle. I shan't miss it - or him!
3 -
I struggle to condemn a person who cares deeply for wildlife R&R, trying to disrupt a hunt is not really bad in my book. Throwing rocks thru windows yes, fire bombing cars yes but not disruption. I thought it may have been something really bad🤷🏻♂️
0 -
That isn’t the debate Rocky - the rights and wrongs of hunts are an entirely separate issue. My point is that CP openly associated himself with what were clearly criminal acts - as decided by a court of law and that it is inappropriate for the BBC to condone this by continuing to allow him to present their programme.
0 -
I see what you are saying R&R, I checked out the countryside alliance site you made available(thank you) then did further research to find there have been literally hundreds of CA members who have not only been to court but actually jailed for violence against the person, animals & homes of those saboteur's. I will honestly say-anyone engaging in law breaking is not someone worthy of promotion to any job.
0 -
Euro News for me as well as Sky News. The former is much more wide ranging than BBC or ITV and while SKY is not so well padded as BBC News, it is a bit more in depth.
Many of the best presenters have left or are leaving BBC, perhaps the rot also applies to the backroom staff as well?
peedee
0 -
There is a fundamental issue here rated to the validity and underpinning rational behind any particular law. There are a many examples of how some laws have only been changed or been reversed for the better through public action and protest. Any attempt to endanger the lives of others is, of course, reprehensible but I don’t read of any such actions being attributed to the presenter in question who quite honestly is under attack from certain unsavoury folk who are propagating falsehoods and fake news for their own selfish ends.
0 -
We are now hearing of folk deliberately attempting the disgraceful in defending their own unsubstantiated and awful claims which have misled, agitated and fuelled a vocal and violent conspiratorial fringe who increasingly post threatening and vile material about him (Chris Packham) and his family.
Those making these claims have no other interest at all but to ridicule, tarnish, remove him from presenting The Watches and destroy the good work he does. Dreadful.
0 -
Attention seeker. Did you read the other day about the making of the next canned programme. Apparently they caught a badger ( how many laws did they break) and put a tracker on him. Then unfortunately they ran over it with their gas guzzling 4 x 4. What a shame. That was my earlier post Deleted User. Probably same fate for this one!!
0 -
Sad that this appears as described the truth is the intention was totally legal and honourable. Like the unfortunate hobby episode there was no malice or ill intention. Despite such occasional unfortunate occurrence bullies must not be allowed to win and they must not be allowed to spread their untruths. Iolo explains the need to do legitimate research and sometimes, with the very best intentions things can go wrong. No reason to stop learning more and helping wildlife.
0 -
You mentioned that before, Fish, and I’ve yet to see you name him/her despite being asked. You seem a tad repetitive of late.
0 -
I think it’s the adjectives you use, not the names themselves.
1 -
Whatever. The postings is about the programme .I am just pointing out how artificial these programmes are whilst for huge number of people these are their only information about wildlife. Presented of course by totally biased people and with the huge Air miles just shows how hypocritical they are. In the end hard cash always triumphs over your beliefs.
0