Yapping / barking dogs
Comments
-
'Cos maybe this is the UK touring section MT?
2 -
Interesting post AD. But don't you think that the dog owner problem could be easily solved if the on site staff took an interest in what was happening on their site and did the job they are being paid to do. ------ No more barking, howling, or dog mess, every owner using a short lead and the site rules being upheld.
Will it happen ?? I doubt it.
K
0 -
Took a bit of working out the "MT" bit JK, but I have it now!
And I agree.Seven pages in, and so far the general consensus (bar one, plus two mates who haven't agreed with bar one, but are willing to give moral support for jumping in without a lifebelt!) is that the idea is in essence...............barking!
It been a really good diversion from other threads though, 10/10 for effort, next please!
1 -
KJ, like with most threads the whole thing(thread within the thread) needs to be followed to make sense, but it does make sense👍🏻😊
PS-MT is Mega Troll, it’s an epithet given to a poster who never posts anything other than derogatory or disruptive posts with the aim of creating disharmony. Hope this helps👍🏻
3 -
good post, sums it up
0 -
One question, I've never looked for it in the site shop and therefore never registered if they sell it or not, but do they stock dog food?
Surly this must be their biggest seller?
0 -
SL won’t be in your Acronymfinder.com SL but here it is. Some acronyms are used out of lazyness(by me😨) so they’re not in common use👍🏻😊
0 -
Never seen any. maybe there's no demand for it due to the limited number of dogs that stay on site
0 -
I note that the OP seems to have disappeared without trace! So, a bit like last weekend's trolling exercise it's becoming clear to me that this is very likely a complete wind up and it's surprising (well, maybe not) that some folk have been naive enough to take it seriously and jump in with support. I suppose any bandwagon will do for some!
3 -
so if the number of Cornettos sold exceeds the number of Pedigree Chum then that conclusively proves that there are more humans than dogs on site?
Oh unless dogs like Cornettos of course?
3 -
that is paws for thought!
1 -
Some would use a collective noun here-Bandwagon Boys(acronym BB) but I won’t use it again as per Rowena’s request👍🏻
1 -
0
-
No, they mustn't have Chocolate, even if it's only the layer inside the cone
0 -
-
What is it ? "The dog Pound".
I'll get me coat.....................
0 -
-
Apologies if a few are not on my wave length, but it wasn't a riddle to those that have indeed kept up! We do Houses of Parliament speak at home, so when trading insults (in a friendly way I hasten to add) you have to find a polite way of putting something derogatory, with no use of naughty words, or banned words. It's H Of P speak, because when an MP is having a go at another MP, they usually start with "the Right Honourable Member......." when what they actually mean is "the lying so and so opposite....." They are not allowed to use the word liar, far too ungentlemanly!
Rocky was bang on with the MT reference, please note it did not originate with me, but is oh so apt!
AD, very perceptive, but I was having a bit of fun, nothing more. At least you worked it out. I am utterly convinced that the OP is indeed a wind up!
0 -
Well, what fun. I’ve been absent a few hours sailing to far flung places and arrived to find the OP has been confirmed as a wind up and another has a new acronym for a nicKname.
Great stuff👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
5 -
Glass houses ?
4 -
Strange, I was under the impression that a consensus had been reached that there were some antisocial CMC customers who allowed their dogs to become a nuisance to other CMC customers. But most dog owning customers were mindful of others.
And That the responsibility for ensuring that the CMC rules are adhered to by all, is that of the (ON - Site) staff. And yet there are still people who want to argue that this is not the case. The thread appears to be going round in circles.
K
0 -
You're half right K, there are good dog owners mindful of others and who dislike bad owners as much as none dog owners. But trolling the on site staff on and off on a forum, knowing they cannot respond as they would like is bad form, ungentlemanly conduct. A lifetime working in the public sector taught me that from a very early stage.
Easy of course when you're not a Member, and don't use Club Sites.
8
