Arrival & Departure Times

12346

Comments

  • Kennine
    Kennine Forum Participant Posts: 3,472
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #152

    Perhaps the warden had not noticed that his watch was running slow. 

    Came back at 2.15pm halfway down the lane caravan and car coming towards me. This is the 3rd one I have come across since I have been here good job I didn have a caravan on the back.

    Write your comments here...Obviously we need to give the warden the benefit of the doubt, the only possible explanation has to be be that his watch battery had gone flat at 11.59 hrs Happy

    Cool

  • Metheven
    Metheven Club Member Posts: 3,987 ✭✭✭
    1,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #153

    Warden discretion, or did they pay!!

    You have no idea but like making assumptions.

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,436 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited September 2016 #154

    Warden discretion, or did they pay!!

    You have no idea but like making assumptions.

    +1 and either are allowed under the rules

  • KjellNN
    KjellNN Club Member Posts: 8,673 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited September 2016 #155

    Caravan arrived at reception here on Sutton-on-Sea site at 11.05am. Told to wait. Laughing

    I trust those wardens apply the same vigour to getting people off site by 12 as well?

    No, thought not......Sad

    Well, they do have a sign outside the office saying something like "all departures by 12 noon".

    The site is very busy.

  • Kennine
    Kennine Forum Participant Posts: 3,472
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #156

    Caravan arrived at reception here on Sutton-on-Sea site at 11.05am. Told to wait. Laughing

    I trust those wardens apply the same vigour to getting people off site by 12 as well?

    No, thought not......Sad

    Well, they do have a sign outside the office saying something like "all departures by 12 noon".

    The site is very busy.

    Write your comments here.........Well thats the problem solved then -----How very proactive of them.

    K Cool

  • IanH
    IanH Forum Participant Posts: 4,708
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #157

    Yes, they do like to lay down the law for new arrivals, but doing to for late departers would mean leaving the office or getting off their tractor.

    So they write a note on their blackboard.......

  • KjellNN
    KjellNN Club Member Posts: 8,673 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited September 2016 #158

    I think you are doing the wardens ar Sutton on Sea an injustice, they were actively checking pitches, making sure people were pitching correctly, and checking that people were departing promptly.

    We are now at Norfolk Broads site, they are also saying all departures by 12 noon.  Today, Sunday, at least 8 vans were in the arrivals area just after 12 noon, so the site is very busy.

  • JohnM20
    JohnM20 Club Member Posts: 1,418 ✭✭
    500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #159

    I think you are doing the wardens ar Sutton on Sea an injustice, they were actively checking pitches, making sure people were pitching correctly, and checking that people were departing promptly.

    We are now at Norfolk Broads site, they are also saying all departures by 12 noon.  Today, Sunday, at least 8 vans were in the arrivals area just after 12 noon, so the site is very busy.

    Write your comments here...We were also at the Norfolk Broads site last week, (sorry KjellNN I didn't spot you), and also saw outfits arriving as early as 10.30am earlier in the week and at least two on Saturday just after 11.00am as we were going off the
    site. Commenting to the warden about this on Saturday afternoon he said that, reluctantly, if there were pitches available they had decided to let early arrivals in because it would be too dangerous if they had to wait out on the road but agreed that members
    should read and abide by specified earliest arrival times and park up elsewhere if they were early.

  • NickyKnix
    NickyKnix Forum Participant Posts: 70
    edited September 2016 #160

    How disruptive is a caravan leaving a site for goodness sake? We're talking caravans here, not a low-loader with heavy industrial plant.

    cyberyacht,

    Ferry crossings run at various times during the day and night.

    Therefore, in order to minimalise disruption to other members staying on Rookesbury and Black Horse Farm, the ferry pitches are nearer to the exit.

  • MichaelT
    MichaelT Forum Participant Posts: 1,874
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #161

    How disruptive is a caravan leaving a site for goodness sake? We're talking caravans here, not a low-loader with heavy industrial plant.

     

    Write your comments here...you clearly have not visited some of the CC sites with limited roads in/out like Chatsworth.  Its also about the rules, if you allow breaking of one why not the rest?

  • JohnM20
    JohnM20 Club Member Posts: 1,418 ✭✭
    500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #162

    The trouble with Wardens disgression is that you won't know where you are. If one site, for example, allows people to turn up early even though it says no arrivals before 12.00 then what about the next site? Do you assume that if it's OK to break the rule
    at one then it's OK to break the rule at all of them. Until you get there you won't know. A recipe for chaos. Answer is obey the rules. They are usually there for a good reason even though it may not, on the face of it, appear to apply to the site you are
    at.

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,404 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #163

    I agree with your last point, John. I'd prefer a more flexible arrival arrangement on sites without access problems but, as a club member, I accept the rule.

    I think the difficulty some folk have understanding this whole subject arises out of the wording in the cub handbook regarding arrival times (fixed, which all members should be aware of and adhere to) and departure times which, when circumstances allow, can be more flexible ( the relevant section is on page 275 of the current handbook!) Happy

  • michelless1957
    michelless1957 Forum Participant Posts: 24
    edited September 2016 #164

    I agree with your last point, John. I'd prefer a more flexible arrival arrangement on sites without access problems but, as a club member, I accept the rule.

    I think the difficulty some folk have understanding this whole subject arises out of the wording in the cub handbook regarding arrival times (fixed, which all members should be aware of and adhere to) and departure times which, when circumstances allow,
    can be more flexible ( the relevant section is on page 275 of the current handbook!) Happy

    The arrival times arent set in stone either  you just turn up and mostly the wardens let you on, if they dont want to they say to wait and you just queue.

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #165

    Unless otherwise stated on the specific sites information,the arrival time is normally 1200, the main purpose is to allow wardens time to service the facilities,toilets/refuse/pitches/etc this is especially important on one couple sites, and on sites with  two couples , as believe it or not,they are by law entitled to have time off, so on some days of the week the site has only one couple,but a call to any site if an earlier arrival time,is needed could invoke "wardens descretion"

  • IamtheGaitor
    IamtheGaitor Forum Participant Posts: 529
    edited September 2016 #166

    if an earlier arrival time,is needed could invoke "wardens descretion"

    This is where the problem lies - certain folk on here happily tell us they ring up and arrive early on every site because they 'need' to which is just taking the Michael.  In a genuine one off situation then there should be a procedure, fair enough, but
    not just because people want to arrive early. If early arrival is an option open to all then just take away the arrival times, making it fair for all,  and  possibly charge for early arrivals. 

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #167

    The trouble with Wardens disgression is that you won't know where you are. If one site, for example, allows people to turn up early even though it says no arrivals before 12.00 then what about the next site? Do you assume that if it's OK to break the rule
    at one then it's OK to break the rule at all of them. Until you get there you won't know. A recipe for chaos. Answer is obey the rules. They are usually there for a good reason even though it may not, on the face of it, appear to apply to the site you are
    at.

    You simply phone ahead and ask.

  • JohnM20
    JohnM20 Club Member Posts: 1,418 ✭✭
    500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #168

    I agree with your last point, John. I'd prefer a more flexible arrival arrangement on sites without access problems but, as a club member, I accept the rule.

    I think the difficulty some folk have understanding this whole subject arises out of the wording in the cub handbook regarding arrival times (fixed, which all members should be aware of and adhere to) and departure times which, when circumstances allow,
    can be more flexible ( the relevant section is on page 275 of the current handbook!) Happy

    The arrival times arent set in stone either  you just turn up and mostly the wardens let you on, if they dont want to they say to wait and you just queue.

    Write your comments here...But where do you queue? At many sites access is narrow and waiting caravans / MHs would just block roads and prevent outgoing units leaving  easily. Also, many sites have little or no waiting area within the site. The very popular
    Chatsworth site immediately springs to mind to name but one site with both these problems. If parked up on a public road the police could accuse you of obstruction and insist that you move on.

  • SteveL
    SteveL Club Member Posts: 12,311 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited September 2016 #169

    Anyone tried passing another vehicle on the long entrance lane to Cirencester Park recently? It's a slalom course avoiding the potholes as it is, particularly on the sharp turn at the top.

    Having some structure to arrival and departure at least means wardens don't need to sit in the office all day and can get on with their other jobs/ grab a quick cuppa or even have a day off occasionally!

  • mickysf
    mickysf Forum Participant Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #170

    Wardens discretion is not the problem at all in my opinion. Afterall the rules which allow the employment of discretion quite clearly and righty directs us to enquire first about the possibility of a later departure.

    The problem comes from those very few who do not ask but just decide to do what they want. Afterall, if the site specifics do not  lend themselves to early arrivals or slightly later departures then you will have been told no. I guess a few just do not want to be told no and so don't bother following the rules.

    If there is a problem it is this few who just do what they want, don't follow the rules and don't bother asking first as directed in the rule who are the problem. 

     

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #171

    Very true

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,436 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited September 2016 #172

    Wardens discretion is not the problem at all in my opinion. Afterall the rules which allow the employment of discretion quite clearly and righty directs us to enquire first about the possibility of a later departure.

    The problem comes from those very few who do not ask but just decide to do what they want. Afterall, if the site specifics do not  lend themselves to early arrivals or slightly later departures then you will have been told no. I guess a few just do not want
    to be told no and so don't bother following the rules.

    If there is a problem it is this few who just do what they want, don't follow the rules and don't bother asking first as directed in the rule who are the problem. 

     

    Yes +1

  • Kennine
    Kennine Forum Participant Posts: 3,472
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #173

    Wardens discretion is not the problem at all in my opinion. Afterall the rules which allow the employment of discretion quite clearly and righty directs us to enquire first about the possibility of a later departure.

    The problem comes from those very few who do not ask but just decide to do what they want. Afterall, if the site specifics do not  lend themselves to early arrivals or slightly later departures then you will have been told no. I guess a few just
    do not want to be told no and so don't bother following the rules.

    If there is a problem it is this few who just do what they want, don't follow the rules and don't bother asking first as directed in the rule who are the problem. 

     

    Write your comments here...Good point Micky.  But it should never be a problem if the warden staff are doing their job properly and ensuring that ALL the site rules are complied with.

    Those who don't think the site rules apply to them, will then find themselves without a pitch as the warden, quite correctly, will have ejected them from the site.

    K

  • Wildwood
    Wildwood Club Member Posts: 3,585
    1000 Comments 250 Likes Photogenic
    edited September 2016 #174

    Wardens discretion is not the problem at all in my opinion. Afterall the rules which allow the employment of discretion quite clearly and righty directs us to enquire first about the possibility of a later departure.

    The problem comes from those very few who do not ask but just decide to do what they want. Afterall, if the site specifics do not  lend themselves to early arrivals or slightly later departures then you will have been told no. I guess a few just
    do not want to be told no and so don't bother following the rules.

    If there is a problem it is this few who just do what they want, don't follow the rules and don't bother asking first as directed in the rule who are the problem. 

     

    Write your comments here...Good point Micky.  But it should never be a problem if the warden staff are doing their job properly and ensuring that ALL the site rules are complied with.

    Those who don't think the site rules apply to them, will then find themselves without a pitch as the warden, quite correctly, will have ejected them from the site.

    K

    I think the problem there is that it means that about 11.30 the wardens would have to take a list of all departures round the site with them and speak to anyone not packing up. It might be possible on smaller sites but if you have 200 pitches then possibly
    not.

    On the Camping in the Forrest site we were on earlier you had a label to display at the front to show when you were leaving and I have had this on commercial sites. Might be worth the club trying it.

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #175

    Arr/dep times will forever be contencious,as it does not matter if the majority of sites can and do try to please most members,there will always be, as we can see by the few vociferous ones who post on CT,be a case of the wardens will be in trouble what
    ever they do,its a fact of life in all areas where the "public/membership" are involved, who the majority are happy with the way the rules are "read" 

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #176

    If the warden puts a sign outside the office saying 

    Depts at ......

    Everyone then knows when they can stay till ... problem solved! Cool

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #177

    If the warden puts a sign outside the office saying 

    Depts at ......

    Everyone then knows when they can stay till ... problem solved! Cool

    ..Which normally happens on busy sitesWink

  • Navigateur
    Navigateur Club Member Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #178

    If the warden puts a sign outside the office saying 

    Depts at ......

     

    . . .  it will be seen only by those who (1) go past the office and (2) look at it.

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #179

    If the warden puts a sign outside the office saying 

    Depts at ......

     

    . . .  it will be seen only by those who (1) go past the office and (2) look at it.

    or make the effort to go and see it Cool

  • Navigateur
    Navigateur Club Member Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #180

     We're talking caravans here, not a low-loader with heavy industrial plant.


    Good try Nicki, but I fear you and many others at "Head Office" don't know what it is like to manoeuver a caravan. A low loader with heavy plant may be much heavier than a caravan but not necessarily all that much larger.

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,436 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited September 2016 #181

    If the warden puts a sign outside the office saying 

    Depts at ......

    Everyone then knows when they can stay till ... problem solved! Cool

    ..Which normally happens on busy sitesWink

    yes seen it a few times, not just 12 but as late as 4pm sometimes