CT usage statistics

245

Comments

  • huskydog
    huskydog Club Member Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #32

    TDA, very true, but that forum seems to pick and choose their members . i was refused entry ,but hey ho there is life other than forumsHappy

    That isn't how it works HD, with all due respect. It is well managed, and has the kind of filter systems that hopefully will be available on here in the future. It is much smaller of course, it is only a year old, but new members  join almost every day,
    some only post very rarely, others post daily.

    Brue, I agree with you, lovely to see lots of newish posters using CT. Just hope their early posts are not pounced on too quickly and that they get the help and interest they deserve.Happy

    TDA, all i can tell you is what happened to me , i filled in the joining form with my forum name "Huskydog" and E-Mail address ,and submitted it ,then a few moments later a box appered telling me i had been banned and my ISP address had been locked

    Maybe i should try again!!!!!

  • Takethedogalong
    Takethedogalong Forum Participant Posts: 17,038 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited January 2016 #33

    I think the drop out rate of posters and posts has been discussed previously, and perhaps recall someone from HQ explaining that CT isn't getting quite the high profile it enjoyed earlier, as the new forum is fairly imminent. There do seem to be a lot of
    new and newish posters around though at the moment, even if only asking specific questions, and this has to be good. no doubt much more emphasis will be placed on encouraging members to take part once the new forum has been developed.

  • rogher
    rogher Forum Participant Posts: 609
    500 Comments
    edited January 2016 #34

    rogher, do you have a "program" to sort all these figures or do you sit there with a pen a paper ??, either way some interesting results.................

    I use software. It takes all sorts...

  • briantimber
    briantimber Forum Participant Posts: 1,653
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #35

    TDA, very true, but that forum seems to pick and choose their members . i was refused entry ,but hey ho there is life other than forumsHappy

    I think that the naughty step may have something to do with it huskySurprised I have been accepted but my membership was never  activated,
    thus not allowing me to post Undecided . Still I'm happy with the forums I use.....Cool

  • rogher
    rogher Forum Participant Posts: 609
    500 Comments
    edited January 2016 #36

     

    Did you include all the user names in the review section Rogher or is that just in the discussion area?

    During the two separate weeks, I observed a total of 1239* different users on CT.

    192 of them were present in both weeks (Regulars?).

    602 present in 2015 were not present in the same week 2016 (Leavers?)

    499 users were seen in 2016 that were not in 2015 (Joiners?).

     

    *Note that these are all types of CT user. About a third do not use the forum, and one fifth only express a “Like” for things (do not comment). There will be many more “Lurkers” who visit to view without leaving a mark.

  • brue
    brue Forum Participant Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #37

    Thanks Rogher!

  • Takethedogalong
    Takethedogalong Forum Participant Posts: 17,038 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited January 2016 #38

    I can't comment on the software used by forums I am afraid, as that kind of technology is way beyond me, but all I know is that the forum I use just allowed me to input my details, respond to understanding the very clear guidance, and accept that I would
    adhere to what was expected of me. This included the very reasonable, nothing defamatory, nothing politically or religiously sensitive ideal, respect for views of others etc..... It is not affiliated to any club, so the link to fees paid isn't there, so I
    think if anyone did give cause for concern, and be prevented from posting it would be a one card and that's it ban. No if's, no but's, no return after a period of suspension, no trying to use an alternative online identity. It is good, it appears to work well. Happy

     

  • Unknown
    Unknown Forum Participant
    edited January 2016 #39
    The user and all related content has been Deleted User
  • brue
    brue Forum Participant Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #40

    I'm now getting "error occured" on this thread.

  • Takethedogalong
    Takethedogalong Forum Participant Posts: 17,038 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited January 2016 #41

    So am I Brue, but may'be for a slightly different reason!Happy

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #42

    TDA, very true, but that forum seems to pick and choose their members . i was refused entry ,but hey ho there is life other than forumsHappy

    I was invited to join and refused. Its a strange worldLaughing

    Fascinating. Do tell more as you've made this claim elsewhere as well. 

    It's not invitation only so this does sound very odd

    Its not a claim but I am not discussing the details with you

    I think you must be confusing forums David. I'm pretty sure the one being referred to in this thread doesn't do "invitations", other than possibly a friend suggesting you join. 

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 13,857 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited January 2016 #43

    I like and appreciate Rogher's forum statistics. I appreciate that they only refer to Club Together but if you take a broader span of forums many of those that were previously very busy but now are shadows of their former selves. Not suggesting that Rogher
    starts looking at other forums to gather statistics but anecdotal evidence suggests that some of the previous very busy forums have less posts now than they once did. Talking to a mod on another forum his view was that their Facebook page was attracting a
    lot more hits and comments than their conventional forum.

    As to people not being welcome on other forums, I don't know which one is being referred to, but I doubt refusal to join is by accident? Anyone can read Club Together and any forum owner can make a judgement on the way people contribute here and act in the
    best interest of their own forum which might mean not accepting someone. I would have thought the best course of action is to approach those that run the forum in question for a response as mentioning it here is unlikely to provide an answer.

    David

  • JayEss
    JayEss Forum Participant Posts: 1,663
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #44

     

    Fascinating. Do tell more as you've made this claim elsewhere as well. 

    It's not invitation only so this does sound very odd

    Its not a claim but I am not discussing the details with you

    I think you must be confusing forums David. I'm pretty sure the one being referred to in this thread doesn't do "invitations", other than possibly a friend suggesting you join. 

    I think you could be right. Referrals by members are the closest you'd get to an 'invitation' 

    How funny. Happy

  • rogher
    rogher Forum Participant Posts: 609
    500 Comments
    edited January 2016 #45

    I have looked at other ‘vanning forums but they do not appear to be as active as this one and I think the reason is down to F*c*b**k, which is not my ‘cup of tea’.

  • brue
    brue Forum Participant Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #46

    You're probably right, other types of social media attract different groups. Although, if using Facebook or twitter etc things from here can be shared.

  • Rocky 2 buckets
    Rocky 2 buckets Forum Participant Posts: 7,101
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #47

    I also joined another Forum, I was by given a 'heads up' by a friend who was a member-yes I was checked out by my known previous attitude on here, by my posting style & attitude to fellow posters. That incidently does not make me good but it obviously made
    me acceptable. Anyone rejected/blocked or denied access I would suggest it is because of their posting styles that have been monitored on other Forums. To post on a Forum where there is no combative attitude is a joy. Furthermore it is refreshing not to have
    to rub shoulders with posters who use infantile & derogatory terms against fellow posters, there really is no need for cheap shots at fellow posters, it says more about you than them. I know some Dour & curmudgeonly posters-I would never accuse them of such
    whether they posted on here or not.

  • brue
    brue Forum Participant Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #48

    Most of the posters on here are friendly and helpful. There is no need to respond to any who may be dispruptive. I have met combative posts even on family history forums, best ignored!

  • Bugs
    Bugs Forum Participant Posts: 480
    100 Comments
    edited January 2016 #49

    Hi Rogher

    I actually found your statistics encouraging!

    There's not really that much of a drop in usage, and I don't think your stats can be used to support a claim that the CT Forum has "one foot in the grave" as mentioned earlier - far from it.

    And as has been mentioned elsewhere in this discussion, a number of factors have contributed to this slight reduction in activity.

    I also think Ro and the CT Staff should be commended for successfully tackling the "heated arguments" that used to generate so much kerfuffle - and posts!!

    Cheers

    Bugs

  • Rocky 2 buckets
    Rocky 2 buckets Forum Participant Posts: 7,101
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #50

    Brue, there is disagreeing & there is combative. Disagreements are bread & butter to healthy debate/discussion, being stalked & attacked is not by any stretch of the imagination acceptable. I have seen it happen on CT to 4posters that I can think of immediately.
    Some folk think being disagreed with is a personal slight-it really isn't at all.

  • huskydog
    huskydog Club Member Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #51

    Ah, thats explains it . i just didn't meet the criteria.........Undecided

  • JillwithaJay
    JillwithaJay Club Member Posts: 2,484 ✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #52

    TDA, very true, but that forum seems to pick and choose their members . i was refused entry ,but hey ho there is life other than forumsHappy

    I was invited to join and refused. Its a strange worldLaughing

    Fascinating. Do tell more as you've made this claim elsewhere as well. 

    It's not invitation only so this does sound very odd

    A very interesting comment I agree as I wasn't aware of any 'invitation only' membership.

    300 siggy photo 6b161378-22ab-47bd-97dd-22af5e8f67ba_zpsbtkpqljt.jpg

  • Spriddler
    Spriddler Forum Participant Posts: 646
    500 Comments
    edited January 2016 #53

     

    I'm sure the one being referred to in this thread doesn't do "invitations", other than possibly a friend suggesting you join. 

    Friend, or agent provocateur? Wink

     

  • brue
    brue Forum Participant Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #54

    Brue, there is disagreeing & there is combative. Disagreements are bread & butter to healthy debate/discussion, being stalked & attacked is not by any stretch of the imagination acceptable. I have seen it happen on CT to 4posters that I can think of immediately.
    Some folk think being disagreed with is a personal slight-it really isn't at all.

    Rocky...the answer to a perceived problem is to discuss it with the forum manager via e mail or the report function.

  • JayEss
    JayEss Forum Participant Posts: 1,663
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #55

     

    I was invited to join and refused. Its a strange worldLaughing

    Fascinating. Do tell more as you've made this claim elsewhere as well. 

    It's not invitation only so this does sound very odd

    A very interesting comment I agree as I wasn't aware of any 'invitation only' membership.

    300 siggy photo 6b161378-22ab-47bd-97dd-22af5e8f67ba_zpsbtkpqljt.jpg

    Jill,

    It seems likely that he's confused a referral link with an invitation. No invitations to join have ever been issued  

    It could always be a different forum.

    Makes a good story I suppose Wink

     

     

  • rogher
    rogher Forum Participant Posts: 609
    500 Comments
    edited January 2016 #56

    Hi Rogher

    I actually found your statistics encouraging!

    There's not really that much of a drop in usage, and I don't think your stats can be used to support a claim that the CT Forum has "one foot in the grave" as mentioned earlier - far from it.

    And as has been mentioned elsewhere in this discussion, a number of factors have contributed to this slight reduction in activity.

    I also think Ro and the CT Staff should be commended for successfully tackling the "heated arguments" that used to generate so much kerfuffle - and posts!!

    Cheers

    Bugs

    Indeed, the average number of posts a day to a thread has risen to compensate for the lower variety of threads being commented on. And the average number of posts per user has risen from 9.5/day to 9.9/day, so it’s not a case of doom & gloom. Maybe the new
    software will generate more interest…

  • Rocky 2 buckets
    Rocky 2 buckets Forum Participant Posts: 7,101
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #57

    Brue, there is disagreeing & there is combative. Disagreements are bread & butter to healthy debate/discussion, being stalked & attacked is not by any stretch of the imagination acceptable. I have seen it happen on CT to 4posters that I can think of immediately.
    Some folk think being disagreed with is a personal slight-it really isn't at all.

    Rocky...the answer to a perceived problem is to discuss it with the forum manager via e mail or the report function.

    I agree with you completely. We know the pressure Rowena is under(workload) as She apologises constantly for the lack of speed with Her replies. Some have mentioned weeks awaiting replies. It will then be a case of waiting for Rowena's workload pressures
    to allow to reduce to a level of getting back to the 'mailer' all the time not having access to CT due to 'perceived' problems with poster/s. My apologies to rogher for going off topic. I enjoy the figures rogher produces, they are quite enlighteningHappy

  • briantimber
    briantimber Forum Participant Posts: 1,653
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #58

    Does not seem like much of a decline to me and bearing in mind about a dozen "star chasers" took themselves  off a few months  ago I woild think genuine  posts are holding up. 

    Who were they then AD ? I can only think of one and he's still here.....Cool

  • huskydog
    huskydog Club Member Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #59

    Does not seem like much of a decline to me and bearing in mind about a dozen "star chasers" took themselves  off a few months  ago I woild think genuine  posts are holding up. 

    Who were they then AD ? I can only think of one and he's still here.....Cool

    Ohoo, I wonder who it isCool

  • briantimber
    briantimber Forum Participant Posts: 1,653
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #60

    My money's on him being the first goldInnocent.......Cool

  • cyberyacht
    cyberyacht Forum Participant Posts: 10,218
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #61

    As I posted some time ago, that issue could be addressed by points only being awarded to "likees" rather than "likers"