Pitch allocation at Rowntree

24567

Comments

  • Mitsi Fendt
    Mitsi Fendt Forum Participant Posts: 484
    100 Comments
    edited April 2016 #32

    Mitzi, I am sure you  will agree that back in the 70s and 80s a 14ft van was accepted as being perfectly adequate for families, in that case why is it the fashion for many large vans now to be use solely by couples. This increasing use of large units seems
    to be a peculiar British trait, when we were in France last year you could almost guarantee that large vans coincided with British occupants 

    If somone requires a larger pitch there should be  some cost involved  similar to extra leg room on an aircraft being an upgrade

    It's very presuptious of you to be sure about what I will aree or disgree with. Maybe we should agree to disagree.

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,404 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited April 2016 #33

    Oh no, here we go again! Paying for a pitch by the square metre! Next thing someone will be suggesting they meter the leccy!! Wink

  • ADP1963
    ADP1963 Forum Participant Posts: 1,280
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2016 #34

    Mitzi, I am sure you  will agree that back in the 70s and 80s a 14ft van was accepted as being perfectly adequate for families, in that case why is it the fashion for many large vans now to be use solely by couples. This increasing use of large units seems to be a peculiar British trait, when we were in France last year you could almost guarantee that large vans coincided with British occupants 

    If somone requires a larger pitch there should be  some cost involved  similar to extra leg room on an aircraft being an upgrade

    Write your comments here...Do you think that those couples may have dogs! or maybe have mobility problems and on occasions want to take grandchildren away with them, or just want space to live their holidays they want to.

  • SteveL
    SteveL Club Member Posts: 12,311 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited April 2016 #35

    Mitzi, I am sure you  will agree that back in the 70s and 80s a 14ft van was accepted as being perfectly adequate for families, in that case why is it the fashion for many large vans now to be use solely by couples. This increasing use of
    large units seems to be a peculiar British trait, when we were in France last year you could almost guarantee that large vans coincided with British occupants 

    If somone requires a larger pitch there should be  some cost involved  similar to extra leg room on an aircraft being an upgrade

    It might be the fact that the weather in this country is somewhat  variable and modern vans allow use all year round, even in sub zero. This was much less common in the 70 & 80's. As far as paying extra for a larger pitch, that is just adding complication
    at the risk of alienating folk. So all the smaller pitches are sold, filled with vans that only just fit and the chap with the tiny Eriba has just had to pay extra for a tennis court. No lets just stick to the current system and let wardens do the job they
    are paid for.

  • mbee1
    mbee1 Forum Participant Posts: 557
    500 Comments
    edited April 2016 #36

    Why should it alienate folk?  You get what you pay for.  I'm a big advocate of choosing on booking;

    HS/grass

    Full service pitch/ordinary

    Awning/non awning

    We have to pay extra for a full service pitch so why not for an awning pitch (larger) over a non awning pitch (smaller). 

    At the moment we all pay the same so I would expect to have the full choice of pitches and seeing some "reserved" annoys me.

  • Navigateur
    Navigateur Club Member Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2016 #37

    I do not want a long caravan.  

    We need a washroom that we both can use without being cramped; a full size bed that can be used at any time without having to be made up; a small kitchen with sink, cooker, fridge and some storage; and space for four people to lounge or dine.

    With the necessary A-frame and wall thickness this comes out at 26 feet.  So I need a pitch to accomodate that, and many do.

  • Greythatch
    Greythatch Forum Participant Posts: 24
    edited April 2016 #38

    We need a washroom that we both can use without being cramped; 

    At the same time?  Happy

    Navigateur, they all seem wants to me. needs are a 6 berth caravan for 6 people not a 4 berth for two people.

    So are you saying that your need for a large pitch for your large caravan overides my choice of pitch for my 2 berth

  • mbee1
    mbee1 Forum Participant Posts: 557
    500 Comments
    edited April 2016 #39

    The answer is, of course, that every pitch should be able to take every outfit apart from awning and non awning pitches. If a pitch is smaller then that should be noted when you book and you should pay less for it.

    Everybody is free to buy the unit they want whether a small 2 berth or a massive 6 wheel motorhome but, as pricing is that the moment, why should a pitch be reserved for the MH rather than the 2 berth caravan? 

  • Takethedogalong
    Takethedogalong Forum Participant Posts: 17,084 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited April 2016 #40

    I'd pay my membership fee before I decided to influence pricing policy! But perhaps you have? Wink

    Asking the question of GT!

  • Navigateur
    Navigateur Club Member Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2016 #41

    We need a washroom that we both can use without being cramped; 

    At the same time?

    Yes, at the same time (and for reasons that are none of anyone else's business). These are basic needs.  If they can not be fulfilled then we would not be caravaning.

    I dont mind having the tow hitch well arcoss the access road; I dont mind parking my Land Rover on the grass (3 meters and all); I dont mind taking shots at the wandering quadruped peeing on my kit; I dont mind coming back at 2am as part of a roudy mob - but I don't as I consider these things unsociable. 

  • Greythatch
    Greythatch Forum Participant Posts: 24
    edited April 2016 #42

    At the same time (and for reasons that are none of anyone else's business).

     Fair comment   Embarassed

  • KjellNN
    KjellNN Club Member Posts: 8,673 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited April 2016 #43

    We use CC sites mainly in low season, we have noticed that, like us, many site users are getting on a bit and most of the vans are pretty big.  Many are twin axles, but not all big vans are T/As. 

    Mainly it is only a couple  in the van, but as someone already said, some have dogs, some take along grandchildren, or even adult children, or other relatives.....we often have my sister with us, so you buy the van that suits your needs.

    We like a decent space, we go away for weeks/months at a time, we are well past roughing it. 

    Width is not an issue, our van is just the standard width, it is only length.  We can fit on most pitches, but it could mean that the rear end has to overhang the grass. That's OK with us.  We only have a Fiamma Zip awning, so no problem there with size.

    However, not all sites or pitches can accommodate a van being parked further back, it can mean it would be too close to the van behind.  This is probably one of the problems at Rowntree.

    There are only a few sites where the length limit is below 8m, so on the vast majority off CC sites if you are 8m your booking will be accepted.  Having made a booking we expect it to be honoured, if this means allocating pitches on occasions then this is
    what has to happen.

    We would have no problem with paying a little extra for a longer pitch if necessary, but at present the Club does not operate in that manner.

    So if you see  longer pitches set aside for longer vans, why does it annoy people so much?  The van will still be in proportion to the size of the pitch, the occupants are not gaining any extra gravel they can use  to sit out on.  The extra space is inside
    the van, and they have already paid for that!

    If you go north in Europe, you will see plenty of longer vans being used, it's not just the Brits that like a bit of space.

     

  • SteveL
    SteveL Club Member Posts: 12,311 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited April 2016 #44

    Why should it alienate folk?  You get what you pay for.  I'm a big advocate of choosing on booking;

    HS/grass

    Full service pitch/ordinary

    Awning/non awning

    We have to pay extra for a full service pitch so why not for an awning pitch (larger) over a non awning pitch (smaller). 

    At the moment we all pay the same so I would expect to have the full choice of pitches and seeing some "reserved" annoys me.

     I don't find it annoying at all. It is just good site management.

    If you are going to charge extra for pitch quality  (as in size) as well as facilities ( as in service pitch). At places like Berwick, you would have to charge extra for some of the smaller pitches, which have the best sea view. Similarly at Wirral Country Park, where a few pitches, although being a similar size, have amazing views.  All too complicated in my opinion, lets leave it as it is with just the extra charge for a service pitch.

  • ADP1963
    ADP1963 Forum Participant Posts: 1,280
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2016 #45

    I find it amazing how some people insist on telling other folk how they should live their lives!.We are all different,nobody is perfect,even though some think they are. Live and let live.

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2016 #46

    Common sense dictates that the CC should decide on the maximum size of unit allowed on their sites and design all of their pitches to accommodate any unit up to that size.

    Anybody with a unit larger than the CC maximum should simply go elsewhere.

    It just needs positive action by Grimstead Towers. -----Simples

    K Cool

    ...I think it states on all sites the Max size of unit even if it might only be a couple of pitches of that size,

  • Wildwood
    Wildwood Club Member Posts: 3,585
    1000 Comments 250 Likes Photogenic
    edited April 2016 #47

    Common sense dictates that the CC should decide on the maximum size of unit allowed on their sites and design all of their pitches to accommodate any unit up to that size.

    Anybody with a unit larger than the CC maximum should simply go elsewhere.

    It just needs positive action by Grimstead Towers. -----Simples

    K Cool

    ...I think it states on all sites the Max size of unit even if it might only be a couple of pitches of that size,

    It may not always be feasible to make all pitches the same size although that would be the ideal solution. If you accept that pitch size varies then you have got to look at pitch allocation. Basically if you have caravans longer than some pitches you need to reserve pitches for them and if you have some very short pitches then you need to make sure those that fit them use them.

    Those that complain about this are simply not looking at the big picture.

  • IanHNW
    IanHNW Forum Participant Posts: 41
    First Comment
    edited April 2016 #48

    Why should it alienate folk?  You get what you pay for.  I'm a big advocate of choosing on booking;

    HS/grass

    Full service pitch/ordinary

    Awning/non awning

    We have to pay extra for a full service pitch so why not for an awning pitch (larger) over a non awning pitch (smaller). 

    At the moment we all pay the same so I would expect to have the full choice of pitches
    and seeing some "reserved" annoys me.

     I don't find it annoying at all. It is just good site management.

    If you are going to charge extra for pitch quality  (as in size) as well as facilities ( as in service pitch). At places like Berwick, you would have to charge extra for some of the smaller pitches, which have the best sea view. Similarly at Wirral Country
    Park, where a few pitches, although being a similar size, have amazing views.  All too complicated in my opinion, lets leave it as it is with just the extra charge for a service pitch.

    Write your comments here...And It's those pitches at Wirral Country Park where you see the cones, also they are not the largest pitches!!!

  • SteveL
    SteveL Club Member Posts: 12,311 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited April 2016 #49

     I don't find it annoying at all. It is just good site management.

    If you are going to charge extra for pitch quality  (as in size) as well as facilities ( as in service pitch). At places like Berwick, you would have to charge extra for some of the smaller pitches, which have the best sea view. Similarly at Wirral Country Park, where a few pitches, although being a similar size, have amazing views.  All too complicated in my opinion, lets leave it as it is with just the extra charge for a service pitch.

    Write your comments here...And It's those pitches at Wirral Country Park where you see the cones, also they are not the largest pitches!!!

    I think it would be better if you said what you mean, rather than   this vague statement and multiple exclamation marks.

  • IanHNW
    IanHNW Forum Participant Posts: 41
    First Comment
    edited April 2016 #50

    Quite simple, having visited Wirral Country Park several times, the pitches with a view are the only ones that have ever been seen with cones on. Nothing vague about that, draw your own conclusions

  • IanH
    IanH Forum Participant Posts: 4,708
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2016 #51

    Can I just say (again).......having been to this site many times and having pitched all over it, all the pitches would fit a twin axle caravan.

    Some pitches are smaller than others (sometimes, but not always, because they are non-awning). Most pitches have hedges behind them and you back right up to the hedge, so not having space behind isn't an issue. There is space on every pitch for the car to
    go next to the caravan.

    Whilst most pitches are of a reasonable size, some are bigger than others. But if you book, for example, an awning pitch, there will be room for a car, twin axle caravan and an awning.

    So yes, some will have a bit more room than others. Especially if you have a small camper van. But surely no one is suggesting that the small camper van arriving at 12:05 should be told which pitch to go on, so that a twin axle owner arriving much later
    (or even the next day) can have a larger pitch reserved for them?

    If you want the choice of your preferred / best / biggest pitch, then you need to get on and get there......and should not expect special treatment.

  • SteveL
    SteveL Club Member Posts: 12,311 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited April 2016 #52

    Quite simple, having visited Wirral Country Park several times, the pitches with a view are the only ones that have ever been seen with cones on. Nothing vague about that, draw your own conclusions

    Still vague I am afraid, you were there not me, what did you think, or establish, was the reason for the cones. Drawing my own conclusions would be pointless, I do not have enough facts.

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2016 #53

    Quite simple, having visited Wirral Country Park several times, the pitches with a view are the only ones that have ever been seen with cones on. Nothing vague about that, draw your own conclusions

    ...Are they well used grass pitches? or are you saying that when you arrive they have cones on that are then let later,and is it every time you use said site,have not been ourselves but is on our to do list

  • IanHNW
    IanHNW Forum Participant Posts: 41
    First Comment
    edited April 2016 #54

    No thery are the hard standings, not the grass which does not seem to be used very often (poor drainage). However keep it on your to do list, very convenient for an area with lots to do & see,

  • IanH
    IanH Forum Participant Posts: 4,708
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2016 #55

    Excuse me but could we keep this thread about York Rowntree please and start another one about Wirral.....

  • RochelleCC
    RochelleCC Forum Participant Posts: 337
    100 Comments
    edited April 2016 #56

    Hi all,

    As members may be aware, over the last 12 months Rowntree Park has undergone some major redevelopment works to improve the appearance of the site and remove the old derelict building that split the site in two.

    Part of this redevelopment involved the removal and relocation of the dividing hedges to increase the number of awning pitches from 10 to 47, which was something that members had been requesting since the pitching exercise that was carried out in 2013.

    As a result of this work, almost 50% of the site can once again accommodate awnings but for this to happen and to comply with fire regulations, it is sometimes necessary to allocate pitches and the larger outfits need to have the larger pitches allocated
    to them.



    I hope that's answered some questions!

    Rochelle 

  • IanHNW
    IanHNW Forum Participant Posts: 41
    First Comment
    edited April 2016 #57

    Excuse me but could we keep this thread about York Rowntree please and start another one about Wirral.....

    Write your comments here...Sory Ian, forgot bending threads is your domain

  • IanH
    IanH Forum Participant Posts: 4,708
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2016 #58

    No Rochelle, I'm afraid it doesn't answer the question at all.

    You are confusing awnings (width and spacing requirements) with length of a unit. The introduction of more awning pitches has nothing to do with the length of a caravan.

    Also, the new layout was in place for most of last year and reserving of pitches was not apparantly required all of last year. It appears to be a new thing.

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2016 #59

    Thankyou Rochelle we there in 2013 when that must have been going on as we were given set number pitches to use as the wardens said they had big vans to arrive 

  • Canenriot
    Canenriot Forum Participant Posts: 113
    First Comment
    edited April 2016 #60

    I like being able to pick my own pitch and that is why I remain in the club.We try to get to sites between 12 and 1 to make sure we get a suitable pitch for the van , but what niggled me at York was the fact so many pitches had cones on for twin axles and
    motorhomes , leaving us two pitches to pick from one which was not at all suitable, as we would have had the nose of the van on the road and the other was not that good either but at least we got on, this was about 12-30 , then seeing smaller motorhomes getting
    the reserved pitches does not make sense.

    We all pay the same membership fee and we should all have the same choice of pitches , first come first served with the exception of disabled requirements.

     

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited April 2016 #61

    No Rochelle, I'm afraid it doesn't answer the question at all.

    You are confusing awnings (width and spacing requirements) with length of a unit. The introduction of more awning pitches has nothing to do with the length of a caravan.

    Also, the new layout was in place for most of last year and reserving of pitches was not apparantly required all of last year. It appears to be a new thing.

     

    Ian  we have also used this site numerous times ,and I think your idea of "All"pitches will take TA vans is a bit "clouded" as the last time we were there ,without obstructing the exit road a TA would not have fitted on the pitch we used, and opposite but a bit further down a M/v was in at an angle to clear the road