C&MC prices V C&CC prices
Comments
-
No idea about the cost implications of various types of accommodation and have only just joined the C&CC. Therefore my experiences on the quality / value for money is nil and on pricing limited. I can however, compare prices CAMC / C&CC sites we have booked for next May. Both are hardstanding with awning and both clear of bank holidays. Kinlochewe CAMC costs £21 per night for two adults, Poolewe C&CC £19.15. However, if you remove the age related discount the price would be £23.65. So dearer in this instance than the CAMC site for anyone under 60.
No idea what sort of pitch you get for £12.40, Perhaps grass non EHU with age related discount applied?
2 -
I did not actually doubt you DD and was trying to get a handle on comparative costs. Personally I think that at the times of year that we travel and the pitch types that we generally want that there is little difference in cost but the C&CC seem to be dearer with, for my purposes, less facilities - until you factor in the age discounts: Then they are certainly cheaper.
I have no inkling as to who or what the FD inquisitors are.
0 -
DD - I do wish you'd stop this rather puerile reference to "FD". We all know what you mean by that - why refer in such a pejorative way to folk whose only "fault" , apparently, is to disagree with your point of view.
Let's be clear - in this thread it was you that brought up the subject of price comparisons, despite then saying it was never your intention to make it a subject for the discussion and then, rather cynically, asking why folk were discussing it.
Good weekend stirring tactics, a bit like "liking" old, critical, threads and then sitting back and watching what happens.
All "brilliantly childish" really, but completely transparent!
6 -
Well maybe DD would like to explain it to you - it's his rather underhand way of avoiding using a group term (remember "usual suspects"?) I'm amazed that you didn't realise that being such a prominent user of this forum, really!
4 -
+1☹️
2 -
SL, it’s a joint collaboration between DD his ‘FD’ & HD’s ‘inquisitors’ thus making the collective noun-‘FD inquisitors’ from DD’s post. This is purely factual to help SL understand the baneful undercurrent😕
1 -
Some of the C&CC showers don't seem to be heated very well. No doubt there are some CMC sites that are the same but I cannot recall any.
But what is poor facility for me are the showers where it is impossible to regulate temperature which means that I generally don't use them as it is for me a very much less than pleasant experience. I have only used 12 C&CC sites and one was non facility. I have had a shower twice.
Really two could be considered non facility as apart from one truly non facility the Norwich site I considered non facility for me. I would probably made some use of the site WC during our 5 night stay but as there were only 2 WCs on a full site and no privacy cubicle it was not much use. OH did go to use the showers around 7 am one morning but with both showers in use and three waiting came back and used ours. The toilet block was probably of it's time (60s ?) and before the site wa extended.
For me it is the fact that the showers on C&CC are no go
0 -
SL, my apologies I didn’t finish the explanation-DD’s FD is-
BrE. (also FD) an abbreviation of the Latin phrase Fidei Defensor, which means 'Defender of the Faith', a title originally given to Henry VIII by the Pope for defending the Roman Catholic religion. When he created the Church of England he kept the title, referring to the new religion.
https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com › ...
3
