Six Nations 2019

124»

Comments

  • mickysf
    mickysf Forum Participant Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #92

    Well, I don't know what to say!🤔 I did enjoy it as a game mind!

    Well done Scotland you deserved that draw on English soil and retention of the Calcutta Cup.

    What now for England, so close but so far away from that perfection needed in Japan?

  • ABM
    ABM Forum Participant Posts: 14,578
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #93

    As  you  so  rightly  say,  Mickysf,  it  was  a  truly  amazing  game.  All  credit  to  a  totally  outplayed  Scotland  for  coming  out  after  the  break  with  load  of  pride,  determination  & clear  heads.  The  Replacements  on  both  sides  made  all  the  difference  so  well  done  to  them.

    Only  one  thing  really  spoiled  the  game  for  me { A  born,  bred  and  proud  ENGLISHMAN }  and  that  was  seeing  yet  another  shoulder  charge  from  Farrell.  He  made  no  attempt  to  block  or  catch  the  ball  from  the  kicker,  nor  did  he  raise  his  arms  to  soften  the  impact  for  both  of  them,  he  just  dropped  his  shoulder  &  kept  running.

    A  very  personal  view  ==  RED  CARD  with  no  excuses.

     

  • mickysf
    mickysf Forum Participant Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #94

    Rugby has today become a collision sport rather than a contact sport in my opinion. It's now down to micro second timing and playing to the very edge and hitting very hard at that. In real time it looked different to the slow motion and I believe a red card would have been a tad harsh decision for Farrell. When playing that close I guess self preservation kicks in and I don't believe he intended to inflict injury. Possibly a yellow but in that heat of the moment it's debatable and so difficult for the pitch ref or even the video ref to make what could be a match/spectacular spoiling decision. Maybe Union ought to introduce the 'On Report' way of dealing with the likes as in Rugby League. Or possibly a carried forward warning into future games. Just a thought!

  • ABM
    ABM Forum Participant Posts: 14,578
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #95

    I'll  let  you  off  this  time  Micksf,  {  But  not  Farrell  grrrrr }

  • mickysf
    mickysf Forum Participant Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #96

    👍wink

    What do you think about the 'on report' idea to address these issues and possibly correct his 'behaviour'?

  • ABM
    ABM Forum Participant Posts: 14,578
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #97

    I  don't  really  follow  'League',  M,  so  I'm  not  totally  sure  how  it  works  but  would  it  not  mean  the  player  got  away  with  it  in  the  context  of  the  6 Nations  but  might  miss  some  later  internationals  ??undecided

  • mickysf
    mickysf Forum Participant Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #98

    It would mean that the incident would be scrutinised thoroughly and at 'leisure' by a panel of match officials and law makers within a a couple of days. A decision is then reached which could carry consequences of missing next game or a series of games, even financial penalties can be issued. It's only used in the instances where an on pitch snap decision is highly likely to be difficult and problematic.

     

  • nelliethehooker
    nelliethehooker Club Member Posts: 13,636
    1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited March 2019 #99

    They do have a "sighting" system where an illegal action missed by the ref is reviewed by a panel and disciplinary action is often take against perpetrator. 

    Have just watched the English Ladies thrash their Scottish counterparts 80-0 and win their version of the 6 Nations. I must say how impressed I was with the all round quality of rugby that they played.

  • mickysf
    mickysf Forum Participant Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #100

    They are slightly different, 'sightings' in Union happen after a match and are not made in real time by the ref. Often it's the coaches who ask for a sighting during the match debrief with the officials.

    The ref in League places the player on report when he has an element of doubt in the heat of game about an infringement. If he is sure he will sin bin or 'red card' a player accordingly though.. 

  • GVD
    GVD Forum Participant Posts: 175
    edited March 2019 #101

    I think there is something lacking in the psyche of England. When the pressure is on them they cannot react to it. This has been proven over a number of years. Yes they have world class players, but when on the "back foot" capitulate. Wales have learnt to live with it, and "have forgotten how to loose". This in no doubt is down to the coaching staff, and perhaps England need to look at this? Again Da Iawn Cymru.

  • mickysf
    mickysf Forum Participant Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #102

    I think there is an element of truth in this of which arrogance may play a detrimental part.

    How dare the Scots do this on our hallowed ground!wink Probably they all, players and staff, needed bringing down a peg or two. Well done the Scots.

  • GVD
    GVD Forum Participant Posts: 175
    edited March 2019 #103

    There is no doubt now that professional rugby is "a game of two halves"

  • ABM
    ABM Forum Participant Posts: 14,578
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #104

    Now  Now,  nivag,  please  behave  yourself,  after  all  it  is  Sunday  innocent

  • ABM
    ABM Forum Participant Posts: 14,578
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #105

    Now  as  far  as  these  CITINGS   of  incidents  go,  I  reckon  they  are  only  good  if  they  are  totally  unseen  by  the  on pitch  & tv  match  officials.

    In  the  incident  I  mentioned ( Farrall's  shouldering  the  Scottish  kicker )  it  was  not,  nor  could  it  be,  missed  by  them  --  the  only  problem  to  my  mind  was  if  they  were  of  differing  opinions  about  the  severity  of  punishment  due.  He  is  becoming  a  bit  of  a  "Serial  Offender"  in  this  tactic  --  I  just  hope  the  powers  that  be  take  him  to  one  side  &  read  the  Riot  Act  mainly  to  protect  his  career  &  other  players  wellbeing.

     

    Sorry  for  the  delay  in  replying,  but  I  just  HAD  to  watch  those  SEVEN  (7 ) goals  on  EFL on Quest  last  night  wink

  • GVD
    GVD Forum Participant Posts: 175
    edited March 2019 #106

    No irony in this. Just look at recent games where the second half has proved a factor. 

    To me Scotland were the team yesterday, even though we won The Six nations. Never say Never..... 

    Eddie Jones needs to look at himself. I think he tries to intimidate other Nations,(Scotland not winning since 1183?) In fact with the draw kept the Calcutta Cup. England haven't seen it for 2 years!!

     

  • ABM
    ABM Forum Participant Posts: 14,578
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #107

    ??  1183  ??  which  clock  are  you  going  by  ??

  • GVD
    GVD Forum Participant Posts: 175
    edited March 2019 #108

    1883 - 1993   2019 Murrayfieldlaughing

  • mickysf
    mickysf Forum Participant Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #109

    Yes, that was my thought, the question was severity of punishment. It looked a tad different in real time. This was a good example of how being put on report at the point of stoppage would have been justified if the match officials were unsure.

    Does anyone know if the incident has subsequently been 'CITED?

  • Extugger
    Extugger Forum Participant Posts: 1,293
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #110

    No need for any 'reporting' or 'citing' in this case as clearly it was just a collision. Check the slow motion evidence and you'll see Farrell's right arm is extended to act as a 'shock absorber' if you like, before the impact of shoulders. No suggestion here of foul play unlike the other occasions where he was lucky to stay on the park. It's a carry over from his days at League football where chest high tackles are prevalent and has crept into the Union code (the laws on mauls don't help either). It's a simple fix to stamp it out and the RFL have started by changing the laws on tackles above the shoulder. How long before anything above waistline is brought in?

     

  • mickysf
    mickysf Forum Participant Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #111

    He's played Union and not league since the tender age of 13! 

    I don't think the problem has crept in from League, 'higher' tackles were allowed in Union when I played, just not around the neck. 

    Coaches have always pushed the boundaries and looked for chinks in the laws and the rule makers are always trying to make the game 'safer' whilst retaining if not improving the spectical of the game as a whole. 

    To be honest, I think the tackle laws in League are far clearer but they too have been evolving recently to eradicate injuries as best they can.

     

  • ABM
    ABM Forum Participant Posts: 14,578
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #112

    Sorry  JR,  I'm  still  of  my  earlier  view  { 2nd  post  on  page  10 }  that  it  was  a  deliberate  shoulder.  But  let  us  not  spoil  a  wet  soggy  Monday,  and  just  agree  to  differ,

     

    Brian.

     

    Now  let  me  get  back  to  a  6  ==  1  victory  elsewhere  on  this  site  wink

  • mickysf
    mickysf Forum Participant Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #113

    That's okay ABM, refs in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres have different takes on certain rules. Even in the UK refs will see things differently even with Video Replay and slowmo.

    Just for 'fun' remember this 'tackle' from a real Welsh hero of yesteryear?

    https://youtu.be/KXY6Wfk0Vyg

  • ABM
    ABM Forum Participant Posts: 14,578
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #114

     Remember  it,  cry ??  My  tele's  not  stopped shaking surprised !!

  • GVD
    GVD Forum Participant Posts: 175
    edited March 2019 #115

    Shoulder to shoulder, not head. No "short arm".....

    Remember the "rucks". If you were on the wrong side, you were "booted / scrapped " out....

     

  • Extugger
    Extugger Forum Participant Posts: 1,293
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #116

    Sorry Micky, not totally true, but it matters not. That's the beauty of our game, we can all discuss our views, respecting others, without a war breaking out 👍😀

    Owen Andrew Farrell was born on 24 September 1991 in Billinge Higher End, Greater Manchester. He began playing rugby league in his hometown at the age of eight for Wigan St Patricks. When his father Andy signed for Saracens in 2005, his family moved to Harpenden where Owen at the age of 13 or 14 was introduced to rugby union for the first time.

     

  • mickysf
    mickysf Forum Participant Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #117

    I'm not sure which bit I got wrong?

    He was training and playing for the Saracens youth squads and teams from aged14.

     

  • Extugger
    Extugger Forum Participant Posts: 1,293
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #118

    Sorry Micky, I read your remarks to mean he'd never played league at all 👍

  • Extugger
    Extugger Forum Participant Posts: 1,293
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #119

    And for those who love a tackle - this one was pretty crucial 😀

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Xu6Pfpfhy54

  • mickysf
    mickysf Forum Participant Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #120

    No problem, it wouldn't have been the first time tonight I'd got something wrong! embarassed

    Do we know if he and the incident in question has been cited?

  • Extugger
    Extugger Forum Participant Posts: 1,293
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #121

    Not read or heard any mention of it anywhere - so must assume no action has been taken