Knaresborough Weekends
Comments
-
I guess somebody has to.
3 -
If you’re talking to me, why would I? I’ve never said that to anyone and never will.
0 -
Maybe a more constructive and pleasant initial response (TW) would have been to have checked the facts (as indeed you have SteveL) then pointed out the OP's error.
Not abusive I think but in places a tad abrasive thread of comments. There seems to be some "in" jokes that a lot of us won't/don't get despite the smiley faces!
1 -
What was there to check out? We don’t query every OP! It wasn’t until Eeyore posted again that we all realised the OP was wildly inaccurate. Steve checked the site availability but couldn’t possibly huave checked the OP's meaning.
Let’s now address your stance on this. I’m puzzled that you quoted Steve's post but addressed most of your comments to me. You evidently can’t see the wood for the trees - and I don’t know how you can you possibly have missed the tongue in cheek humour. Most of all, why do you feel it’s incumbent upon you to take the rest of us to task? I feel you are sitting in judgement on us and that isn’t good on a forum.
1 -
Hi everyone,
This discussion seems to have gone off topic and turned into a few arguments. As Eeyoresdad has explained further and members have advised about a nearby site not being open, I will now close this discussion.
Thank you to those who have contributed constructively. Please remember to always abide by the guidelines and be friendly at all times as it's easy to misinterpret posts on forums and we want CT to be a friendly community for all to enjoy.
Many thanks.
2