New club branding & logo

Shukokaiuk
Shukokaiuk Forum Participant Posts: 20

Has anyone received the new club magazine & Handbook?

What a disaster you can't see the new logo on the packaging for the magazine.

Received my new handbook NO CARAVAN on this one unlike last book,

just a Motorhome

Perhaps it should have been thought out before printing and re branding that both caravan & motorhome should be included on the front cover?

Perhaps we Club members might request a re think by the directors or person / s responsible for this entire waste of our membership fee's?

 

«13

Comments

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #2

    Not much chance of a change. There is a thread elsewhere on this topic so no doubt this one will be closed and details given of the other thread

  • BasnhoJ6
    BasnhoJ6 Forum Participant Posts: 1
    edited March 2017 #3

     New Logo and Magazine Update.

    Once again,what a disaster.  The logo printer ran out of ink before mine was put through.  Please tell me this is not as intended.

    The Magazine is just the opposite.The Blood red ink that is found on almost every page is painful on the eyes and is completely OTT.

    I expected to see Dennis the Menace or Garfield to appear on the next page.

    What happened to the informative and casual style. Please refer to old copies of EN ROUTE.

  • walkerballance
    walkerballance Forum Participant Posts: 1
    edited March 2017 #4

    Like the new logo but the colour......boring. 

    We are vibrant get up and go people lets have something and colour to represent that.

    Have just switched from a caravan to a motorhome so I am happy the Caravan Club has embrassed but concepts of mobile living.

  • dmiller555
    dmiller555 Forum Participant Posts: 717
    500 Comments
    edited March 2017 #5

    The club embraced motorcaravans around 1962, I don't know when they became motorhomes though. 

  • Toppo
    Toppo Forum Participant Posts: 6
    edited March 2017 #6

    The new 'corporate' logo looks like it belongs to a private healthcare or funeral plan company!  A better idea would to  have had members send in designs to win a prize.  Instead the CARAVAN CLUB pays a design and marketing house to create what looks like abstract hands cupping a crocus.  My new sticker is in my windscreen, and someone has already asked if it was a parking permit laughing

  • Takethedogalong
    Takethedogalong Forum Participant Posts: 17,032 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited March 2017 #8

    Given that the current DG is the ex marketing director, and that the Club has a relatively new marketing director, no doubt recruited for his expertise, one sincerely hopes that nothing was outsourced to another marketing company! cool

     

  • rathlarg
    rathlarg Forum Participant Posts: 3
    edited March 2017 #11

    My Handbook still has not arrived, I await it with interest.

    frederic

  • Fisherman
    Fisherman Forum Participant Posts: 2,367
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #12

    You would think the "Better" club would at least have had a club site on the cover picture, just for the free advertising. I suppose like the rebranding " costings" doesn't enter the HO tea drinkers mind set.

  • KeefySher
    KeefySher Forum Participant Posts: 1,128
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #14

    What I find amusing is that staff members apply roolz applicable to them as employees to the paying customers otherwise known as members in a retail business such as the CC / camc wotever cool

    If the 'management' wish to suppress valid opinion, which is expressed by the fee paying members, then perhaps they should develop an intellect akin to the kindergarten playground they appear to be on level par with tongue-out

     

    Closing threads due to non agreement with posted comments is at best childish, at worst a sign of facism tongue-out

     

    Leadership in organisations requires a degree of intellectual capability that evidently is beyond the upper echelons of the CC / camc wotever 

  • Rocky 2 buckets
    Rocky 2 buckets Forum Participant Posts: 7,101
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #15

    That's the first step to getting this thread locked. It's called abusefrown

    check out the T&C's before posting.

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,135 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited March 2017 #16

    KS, insulting the staff and mods certainly invites moderation of your post. It is very likely to be edited/Deleted User and quite rightly so. If those comments were made to you, you would very likely be calling for those self same rules to be invoked against the perpetrator.

  • Eurolandy
    Eurolandy Forum Participant Posts: 16
    edited March 2017 #17

    Management were bound to find a reason end the ‘Same Club Just Better’ thread due to much bad publicity out there that won’t go away (wait until the SUN gets hold of it!). I agree, closing threads and denying members their say is not very democratic but unfortunately in this case not unexpected.

    Must be tough at the top!

    It is interesting to read the various comments on the new logo and its colours. Personally I don’t like, not related to this pastime it at all. I spent a number of years in aerospace design, part of this working on human engineering issues for aircrew. I agree the colours on the logo are poor and reading the comment of one member on another thread, could be hard to read on the road if you are not familiar with the area in which you are travelling. In my opinion the colours would in some cases blend in with the background and could be missed. The red flag on the old logo is instantly recognisable and clear. I have witnessed many times members missing the Kendal Club sign (we use Kendal frequently) and having to do a complicated 180 Degree turn in the busy local lanes, so what will it be like with the new signage if unfamiliar with the area (it would help if people moderated their speed a little though).frown

  • Rocky 2 buckets
    Rocky 2 buckets Forum Participant Posts: 7,101
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #18

    No ifs or buts, if you can't put your point across without abuse then you have no right to post on a family forum. It may give the individual a sad sense of achievement but it is not acceptablefrown

  • Takethedogalong
    Takethedogalong Forum Participant Posts: 17,032 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited March 2017 #19

    Apologies to all, as I know that correcting spelling and grammar is somewhat frowned upon, but when someone posts  the words "intellectual capability" in the same paragraphs as "roolz" and "wotever" I find my teeth grinding with frustration at the mangling of the written word! 

    Spelling mistakes are totally forgivable and should pass by without comment, but deliberate "dumbing down" is something a bit different. 

     

     

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,135 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited March 2017 #20

    "Management were bound to find a reason end the ‘Same Club Just Better’ thread due to much bad publicity out there that won’t go away (wait until the SUN gets hold of it!). I agree, closing threads and denying members their say is not very democratic but unfortunately in this case not unexpected."

    If you class insulting other members and staff as bad publicity then you're certainly right, Eurolandy. The posters who made those remarks created a shocking showcase for the club and brought moderation upon themselves. The T&Cs and guidelines are there for a reason and, if people don't follow them, they must live with the consequences.

    No one has been denied their say providing they do it in an appropriate way. Those who break the rules are the ones flouting democracy by choosing to go their own way despite having agreed to abide by the rules when they signed up to the forum.

  • David2115
    David2115 Forum Participant Posts: 547
    100 Comments
    edited March 2017 #21

    My goodness me, a perfect example of why some people have the perception that the caravan club was tuck in the past with caravan sites full of old fuddie duddies. 😄 CAMC rulz ok!!😜

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #23

    The Caravan Club welcomed Motor Caravans as part of the same Club in 1962wink

  • Rocky 2 buckets
    Rocky 2 buckets Forum Participant Posts: 7,101
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #24

    Now they have it in print JV, far better for inclusivitysmile

  • David2115
    David2115 Forum Participant Posts: 547
    100 Comments
    edited March 2017 #25

    Nuff sed 😜

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #26

    They always were part (well since 1962) but only started to be "left out"when some one in marketing decided they should be "homes?" surprised

  • Rocky 2 buckets
    Rocky 2 buckets Forum Participant Posts: 7,101
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #27

    If Moho's are nearly 50% of the LV'ers then I agree they should be given that acceptance in print. 1962?, that's 55 years ago, things change, the world moves on. Accept it. Clinging on to the past is not healthyfrown

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #28

    I still cling on to my Caravans as a name that is no different to Motor Caravans except with more space for the available length and a go anywhere vehicle that is detachablewink

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #29

    Probably, as yet, only 40% but who is counting? Not me.

  • Rocky 2 buckets
    Rocky 2 buckets Forum Participant Posts: 7,101
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #30

    I guess it depends on the figures each of us have read ETsmile

  • Rocky 2 buckets
    Rocky 2 buckets Forum Participant Posts: 7,101
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #31

    Excellent JV, I'm happy for yousmile