1.6 versus 2 litre engine fuel economy

Dr Nigel
Dr Nigel Forum Participant Posts: 49
edited August 2016 in Towcars & Towing #1

I'm looking at purchasing a Peugeot 308SW - the 1.6 diesel and 2 litre fuel economy is supposed to be the same when not towing.

Can anyone say what the fuel economy difference between the two would be when towing 1300kg caravan?

 

 

Comments

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,142 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited August 2016 #2

    I've no personal experience of this car - indeed I loathe Peugeots - but logic says the 2.0 will not be working so hard when towing and, therefore, should not give worse MPG than the 1.6 and may actually return better figures.

    Personally, I wouldn't contemplate any car under 2.0 as a towcar for a 1300kg van.

  • Fysherman
    Fysherman Forum Participant Posts: 1,570
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2016 #3

    In caravanning (as in other things) bigger is better.

     

  • madhouse4
    madhouse4 Forum Participant Posts: 129
    edited August 2016 #4

    From experience a more lightly stressed engine is more reliable! We've fitted more than 1 turbo to the 1.6 engine! Can't remember fitting any to the 2.0 litre

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,142 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited August 2016 #5

    Which suggests the 1.6 is working too hard.

  • Wildwood
    Wildwood Club Member Posts: 3,582 ✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments Photogenic
    edited August 2016 #6

    A lot may depend on the gearing. Cars labelled economy usually achieve this with very high gearing which might make them poor tow cars. At the same time a smaller engine will have to work harder so may use more fuel because of this. Both will have differences
    in the drive line that will further complicate matters,

    In the end there is no way of being sure which will be the most economical tow car. 

  • Dr Nigel
    Dr Nigel Forum Participant Posts: 49
    edited August 2016 #7

    Many thanks...I think I'll go for the 2 litre engine...a pity the pre registered Mondeo estates in colours rather than white or black are so rare, as I would have gone for one of those instead, but the 12 depreciation on a new one is horrendous!

  • Fysherman
    Fysherman Forum Participant Posts: 1,570
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2016 #8

    You are right about the depreciation on the Mondeo but what a good looking car it is.

    A low milage year old 4x4 version might be a cracking buy.

  • flatcoat
    flatcoat Forum Participant Posts: 1,571
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2016 #9

    If your option is a Mundaneo then surely a 508 estate would be better to consider, or a Focus? The 308 is a Golf/focus class sector car.... and personally i would rather have a black or white Mundaneo than just about any Purged O. The old rule of thumb used
    to be drive the biggest engined car you can afford and tow the smallest lightest van you can manage with.

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2016 #10

     ..... The old rule of thumb used to be drive the biggest engined car you can afford and ...

    As long as it wasn't French. SWMBO's C3 is the biggest, most expensive (in terms of things that have failed on a 27000 mile, 60 plate) car we've ever had.

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,142 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited August 2016 #11

    Oh, yes, Mondeo every time, irrespectIve of colour.

  • cyberyacht
    cyberyacht Forum Participant Posts: 10,218
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2016 #12

    and you get a free coat hanger. Wink

Categories