Cars per pitch

PhilHeller
PhilHeller Forum Participant Posts: 267
100 Comments
edited September 2016 in UK Campsites & Touring #1

Has probably been discussed before but cannot find anything. Is there a rule about how many cars can be parked on a pitch. I thought it was 1 car per pitch except for motorhomes towing a small car. I am currently keying this while looking at 2 vehicles on
the next pitch

«1

Comments

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,404 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #2

    Not sure what the actual ruling is; I think a second car is allowed but at a cost (maybe wrong!)  But I have to ask,Phil,  is it spoiling your holiday? 

    Wink. Use left and right arrows to navigate.

  • PhilHeller
    PhilHeller Forum Participant Posts: 267
    100 Comments
    edited September 2016 #3

    Just the few discussions lately about rules not being applied got me thinking and I was just after clarification. Many years ago on this same site I was told (not asked) to move my van approx 9 inches after the warden watched us set it all up first

  • EJB986
    EJB986 Forum Participant Posts: 1,153
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #4

    Is this a wind up?SurprisedHappy

  • RangeRoverMan
    RangeRoverMan Forum Participant Posts: 125
    edited September 2016 #5

    Got to be surely!

  • huskydog
    huskydog Club Member Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #6

    Well it makes a good points earnerWink

  • PhilHeller
    PhilHeller Forum Participant Posts: 267
    100 Comments
    edited September 2016 #7

    Is this a wind up?SurprisedHappy

    Write your comments here...genuine question to which I had hoped for sensible responses

  • Rocky 2 buckets
    Rocky 2 buckets Forum Participant Posts: 7,101
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #8

    Phil, the only way to get a definitive answer would be to contact the CC direct. My opinion is-one car per pitch or pay for another one, if not paid for then it has to be parked in a recognized carpark. That is personal opinion based only on what I thinkHappy

  • mjh2014
    mjh2014 Forum Participant Posts: 130
    edited September 2016 #9

    " f. Anyone visiting someone staying on site will need to see the Site Staff on arrival to ensure their stay is safe. The Site Staff may allow visitors' cars to be parked within the pitch they're visiting. If staying overnight a fee for both visitors
    and their cars will be charged."

    This is all I can find in the club site rules. We have had two cars on a pitch: I work full time but OH is retired, so a few times at weekends he will tow the van and set up at lunchtime, and I zoom up to join him the minute I am released. At Durham I parked
    in the visitor car park, at Old Hartley I left my car outside on the grass and at Whitewater the warden was quite happy for me to put my car on the pitch as it did not affect fire gap. So it depends Happy



  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,436 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited September 2016 #10

    I have often (selfishly no doubt according to some) had two cars on one pitch. There is a cost, the last time was £2 per day. When asked if I could the warden asked for my pitch number has he had to check if the extra car could fit physically and also didn't
    breach the 3m spacing in any direction.

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,436 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited September 2016 #11

    SteveL found this link for second car or boat on pitch:
    here

  • IamtheGaitor
    IamtheGaitor Forum Participant Posts: 529
    edited September 2016 #12

    We often have two cars on pitch. Last site we were on we didnt, we put the second car in the car park, but next door had two cars, one on the grass across the back of their caravan.

    We used to be charged for the second car but I think this has been dropped now and as long as you can fit them on your pitch it is fine.  

    It doesnt cause anyone else a problem so I dont really see what the OP's point is to be honest.

  • papgeno
    papgeno Forum Participant Posts: 2,158
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #13

    We were at Ferry Meadows recently and a sign said strictly one car per pitch. Even though the car park there on the East side is quite large there were two cars on some pitches.

  • IanH
    IanH Forum Participant Posts: 4,708
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #14

    Having two cars (and often an awning as well!) on a pitch is over-crowding, very selfish and shouldn't be allowed.

    At York Rowntree, I seem to remember a sign or maybe in the handout they give you, saying one car per pitch. Any visitors to use local public car parks. Very sensible.

  • Unknown
    edited September 2016 #15
    This content has been removed.
  • Kennine
    Kennine Forum Participant Posts: 3,472
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #16

    I have often (selfishly no doubt according to some) had two cars on one pitch. There is a cost, the last time was £2 per day. When asked if I could the warden asked for my pitch number has he had to check if the extra car could fit physically and also didn't breach the 3m spacing in any direction.

    ...notwithstanding the OP's specific issue re cars 'allowed' on a pitch, what is the 3m spacing regarding, say, a car and another car on the same pitch? do they need to be 3m apart?

    if not, it seems a bit odd that they must be 3m from a unit (caravan) on the next pitch, but not from their own unit(?) or from each other...

    do fires only spread from caravan to caravan and not from one burning car to another, or to an immediately adjacent caravan?

    surely, ALL flammable 'items' (cars, caravans, MH) must be the minimum distance from each other, not just from those same items but on another pitch?

    ive often wondered why a car can be parked right up against a caravan on the same pitch (where a fire could spread form one to another) yet rules between pitches are different.

    a fire breaks out in a car on a pitch, those in the caravan right next to it burn....apparently ok....those on the next pitch escape due to the 3m rule....apparently ok.....

    as long as the fire remains on one pitch....apparently ok....the containment rules will have worked....Sad

    all cars in the car park well away from caravans and MH seems a far more 'safe' situation.....

    Write your comments here...A number of well thought out scenarios BB.  All valid !! -- Good post !!

    K

  • Rocky 2 buckets
    Rocky 2 buckets Forum Participant Posts: 7,101
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #17

    A warm welcome back K, it's good to see you back up to your usual posting levels. I do hope you have sorted your issues that Merve informed us of a few weeks agoHappy

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #18

    The spacing on sites would be to enable time for the neighbours to evacuate ,with more clothes on than was as understood at the last known scenario

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,404 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #19

    Occasionally we have had 2 cars on site, but one was always left in the visitors car park. I agree that 2 cars on a pitch can give the appearance of overcrowding, especially with an awning in use, but since it is down to folks'
    choice and, as I believe, they pay for the second car
    I don't see how it can possibly be regarded as selfish. Another example of things which occur very infrequently but give some an opportuninty to jump up and down and stamp their feet!

    Wink. Use left and right arrows to navigate.

  • toowetforcamping
    toowetforcamping Forum Participant Posts: 42
    edited September 2016 #20

    Is it not time for the Club sites to have a weekly Fire Drill on a 'worst scenario' basis ?  such as -

    Fire drills to take place at 2.00am every Sunday morning and all occupants to exit their vans through the windows, escaping through a door will not be allowed. Laughing

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,436 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited September 2016 #21

    Occasionally we have had 2 cars on site, but one was always left in the visitors car park. I agree that 2 cars on a pitch can give the appearance of overcrowding, especially with an awning in use, but since it is down to folks'
    choice and, as I believe, they pay for the second car
    I don't see how it can possibly be regarded as selfish. Another example of things which occur very infrequently but give some an opportuninty to jump up and down and stamp their feet!

    Wink. Use left and right arrows to navigate.

    I think you've hit the nail on the head, some just don't want others to have choice and label it being selfish when they excercise this choice, 

    On topic, the club charges a fee for a second car (or boat) when the 3m spacing allows. 

  • JillwithaJay
    JillwithaJay Club Member Posts: 2,485 ✭✭
    500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #22

    One car only permitted on pitches at Burrs Country Park.

    photo 78301b06-7bdd-45fe-8ae2-d4d2cae14135_zpssi5htrez.jpg

  • Unknown
    edited September 2016 #23
    This content has been removed.
  • Unknown
    edited September 2016 #24
    This content has been removed.
  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,436 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited September 2016 #25

    Occasionally we have had 2 cars on site, but one was always left in the visitors car park. I agree that 2 cars on a pitch can give the appearance of overcrowding, especially with an awning in use, but since it is down to folks' choice and, as I believe, they pay for the second car I don't see how it can possibly be regarded as selfish. Another example of things which occur very infrequently but give some an opportuninty to jump up and down and stamp their feet! Wink. Use left and right arrows to navigate.

    I think you've hit the nail on the head, some just don't want others to have choice and label it being selfish when they excercise this choice, 

    On topic, the club charges a fee for a second car (or boat) when the 3m spacing allows

    ...but, again, this is 3m from any other flammable item on another pitch.....not 3m from any other flammable item (say, on the same pitch).

    this is from the next outfit, 6m between carvans, 3m between the next outfit. An outfit is classed as car, caravan, awning, and as there is the possiblity of an extra car or boat, they are also included.

    Are you really being obtuse BB, you expect 3m from a car to caravan? You'll be wanting 3m from caravam to awning as well.

    Anyway as it's another of the rules you have signed up for, but want to change, you'll just have to live with itWink

  • Unknown
    edited September 2016 #26
    This content has been removed.
  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,436 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited September 2016 #27

    I think you've answered your own question BB, the idea is to stop fire spreading to the next pitch. It is totally nonsense to have 3m between everything on a single pitch.

  • toowetforcamping
    toowetforcamping Forum Participant Posts: 42
    edited September 2016 #28

    Obviously one family burning to death is acceptable but more than one is carelessness Surprised

  • Kennine
    Kennine Forum Participant Posts: 3,472
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #29

    The simple and straightforward way of ensuring fire safety is to have, on each pitch, either one motor caravan or one towed caravan.  This would maintain the correct firebreak spacing.

    Towcars would be parked in the site car park.

    K

  • huskydog
    huskydog Club Member Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited September 2016 #30

    Unless it's a Vauxhall Zafira, then they can be parked as far away from everythingSurprised

  • Unknown
    edited September 2016 #31
    This content has been removed.