Who owns the 'club'

13»

Comments

  • RochelleCC
    RochelleCC Forum Participant Posts: 337
    100 Comments
    edited March 2017 #62

     

    Mod edit: post had previously stated in error that the Club does not have shareholders, correct post as follows:

    By way of clarification, there is no specific list of Shareholders.  As you may have seen in the Articles, a Shareholder is the holder of one or more shares in the capital of the Company, which consists of £100 divided into 100 shares of £1 each.  The Caravan Club of Great Britain & Ireland (1935) Limited was the shareholder, but the Executive Committee holds these shares in trust for the benefit of members.  Voting members comprise both Full members and Shareholders.

  • Navigateur
    Navigateur Club Member Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #63

    Thank you Rochelll - some clarity at last. Even though they are refered to a number of times in the "Articles" they do not exist, and therefore the share capital neither.

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #64

    As I understand it? the original 1907 club was bought by a company Link House? and then "reformed" into the Caravan Club in 1935? With the internationaly known brand and logo now "replaced?"

  • Fisherman
    Fisherman Forum Participant Posts: 2,367
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #66

    Its an elite cub within the club.

  • nelliethehooker
    nelliethehooker Club Member Posts: 13,639 ✭✭✭
    1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited March 2017 #67

    I worries me that the organisation could go the way of other mural organisations like Building Societies when they thought they weren't modern enough. Not a single one survived demutualisation.

    I think you're wrong there Boff, the Nationwide did not demutualise if I remember correctly, and is still a Building Society.

  • JayEss
    JayEss Forum Participant Posts: 1,663
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #68

    When I'm invited to vote as a C&CC member I can do so online and I choose which candidate to vote for 

    The last election documents from this club suggested that I could authorise the chairman to vote on my behalf but I could not see how to indicate how I would like him to vote. So turning up in person to vote would be the only way to vote against a candidate but as there is usually only one candidate and the chairman votes on behalf of countless absent members change seems unlikely 

  • Boff
    Boff Forum Participant Posts: 1,742
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #69

    One of the primary duties of the Directors / Executive Committee, the name can be used interchangeably as it the same people,  is to appoint the Director General of the club and to delegate the day to day running of the club to that person, currently Mr Nick Lomas. 

    The Director General is a professional.  This is quite correct because the caravan club (anything else is just a trading name) is a large organisation, I would suggest at least as large as any UK manufacturer and a complex organisation.  As such the Director General deserves and should be well rewarded for carrying out his job.

    I believe that products, such as the insurance, travel, sites   Should be offered, at a price that is sustainable rather than maximising revenue,as services to the membership   I fear that there is a risk that the professional arm of the club could see the membership as little more than a database, mailing list  of largely affluent customers to whom they can sell the services   

    It therefore must be the a role of the Executive Committee and I would say the main role to ensure that they don't allow the aims of the Club to be subverted. By that I mean it does not allow the proffesional tail to wag the dog.  

     

  • cyberyacht
    cyberyacht Forum Participant Posts: 10,218
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #70

    Voting members comprise both Full members and Shareholders.

    I shall look forward to expressing my view at the ballot box on the actions that have been visited upon us - a dysfunctional website/IT and 'rebranding' to name the two latest examples.

  • Boff
    Boff Forum Participant Posts: 1,742
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #71

    I was referring to those building societies that chose to to demutualise waving promises of cheques to their members as incentives to vote the "correct" way.  By coincidence I have had a Nationwide current account since the mid 80's so I am very aware it is still a mutual building society.  

    The parallel I was trying to draw with the Building Societies.  Is that they were seen as old fashioned boring organisations.   That needed whizz-kids to  cause a step change ( where have I heard that vacuous cliche recently I wonder?)in their performance.  The result was in a few years and sometimes it seemed like months they managed to squander both reserves and reputations that were built up over generations. 

  • RKJ52
    RKJ52 Forum Participant Posts: 130
    First Comment
    edited March 2017 #72

    Had an excellent letter back from the Club and to clarify in very simple terms:-

    The executive committee are the shareholders and they hold them in trust for the members. If the club were ever to go along the same lines as the RAC, or go bump, then surplus funds with be distributed to full members over 5 years standing.

    Full members are those who pay the £49 per annum, that is literally the ones who pay the fee. So for example, a husband and wife on a joint membership, only one would be a full member, that is the one who pays the fee.

    All full members are entitled to attend and vote at the AGM.

    So in fact, we (£49 fee payers over 5 years of membership) do own the club.

  • brue
    brue Forum Participant Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #73

    Rkj this is why companies have Articles of Association which set out all the legalities. These are on view in About Us at the end of the page.

  • RKJ52
    RKJ52 Forum Participant Posts: 130
    First Comment
    edited March 2017 #74

    Rochelle,

    I think the club have been very open and honest in their response and have answered the original question, so as the op, please feel free to close this thread.

    Thanks

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #75

     Why close though as others may wish to reply? 

  • PhilHeller
    PhilHeller Forum Participant Posts: 267
    100 Comments
    edited March 2017 #76

    More confused than ever, on the one hand we are being told we are only club members with basically no control at all and now being told we are full members because we pay our £49 fee🤔 Think I will go and lie down in a dark room again.

  • RochelleCC
    RochelleCC Forum Participant Posts: 337
    100 Comments
    edited March 2017 #77

    Hi everyone,

    Hopefully the answers given have cleared up any queries. If you need any more information you can look at the ‘Articles of Association’ and ‘The Club and how it works’ on the website.

    At the request of the OP I will now close this thread.

    Thanks

  • Wildwood
    Wildwood Club Member Posts: 3,581 ✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments Photogenic
    edited March 2017 #78

    Basically the members own the club and it is run by an elected committee. The problem is how do you get a committee representative of the membership. The present system relies on mostly members being proposed by the DA's and then others being brought in by the committee. It is not truly representative although, I have no doubt they are all dedicated to the club, and do their best for it, but they are not truly a cross section of members.

    I suspect even the committee would agree a wider based representation would help, but just how you get a good balance of members who are not involved in other areas of the club, is not one I can see an easy answer to.

    You do get a chance to vote for the committee each year but in general they are just names to most of us and the choice is very limited so we have no actual influence.