Most number of likes?
I just noticed that on the thread “I Love Dogs Me” the OP by Rocky has 20 likes.
That’s an incredible amount of likes, or so I thought, until I checked the old thread “Sunday departures on Club sites” and the OP has got 261 likes. This must surely be a record, or is it?
Comments
-
Malc might keep a record of his
must be the most from an individual
Hmm, Malc might have been on four gold stars by now if we could like a post more than once.
Just kidding Malc.
0 -
I didn't count them Pippah, that was just one post not the whole thread.
0 -
Good point Nevers, whichever way you cut it-Dogs & the love of them is still quite niche but the Sun Deps thread was open to everyone with wifi & an opinion. I miss the Sun Deps thread, always controversial & always fun
0 -
IMO "LIkes" is the method of choice for the "Star Chasers". Does not mean it's a good thread. ----On the other hand interesting threads will always get a good following and posters will respond with posts rather than "Likes".
The Sun Deps discussion, which a couple of posters have raised earlier in this thread, was all good fun at the start, until a few people started taking the huff. ----Then it became boring and repetitive. ---Good for the Star Chasers but that's all,-- but not good for the forum. ---Best leave it to die in peace.
Cheers...................K
0 -
IMO "LIkes" is the method of choice for the "Star Chasers". Does not mean it's a good thread. ----On the other hand interesting threads will always get a good following and posters will respond with posts rather than "Likes".
The Sun Deps discussion, which a couple of posters have raised earlier in this thread, was all good fun at the start, until a few people started taking the huff. ----Then it became boring and repetitive. ---Good for the Star Chasers but that's all,-- but
not good for the forum. ---Best leave it to die in peace.Cheers...................K
...Ah the Sun thread only got boring because a few could not understand the rules RIP
0 -
"Likes" are biased. There is no "dislike" button (apart from clyping to the monitors)
0 -
I think a couple of my posts on the Sunday Departures thread got the most posts.......not too surprising, really.......
Your posts very likely did get the most 'posts' in response, Ian, because you needed to be reminded of the rules. Likes, is another matter entirely.
0 -
I think a couple of my posts on the Sunday Departures thread got the most posts.......not too surprising, really.......
Your posts very likely did get the most 'posts' in response, Ian, because you needed to be reminded of the rules. Likes, is another matter entirely.
Drat! Meant to say likes........
0 -
I just noticed that on the thread “I Love Dogs Me” the OP by Rocky has 20 likes.
That’s an incredible amount of likes, or so I thought, until I checked the old thread “Sunday departures on Club sites” and the OP has got 261 likes. This must surely be a record, or is it?
Write your comments here...Felt obliged to like this!!!
0 -
No matter who you are, employed or unemployed, young or old, male or female, caravanner or motorhomer, hardstanding or grass, own facilities or onsites, to the peg or not, pitch facing in or out, leave early or late ........ Malcolm 'likes' you
0 -
This is where the inconsistency is on CT , TF started a thread here ( how do we move on) and it was moved ,but this one is about the use of CT and doesn't get moved , I'm all ears for an explanation
Write your comments here...
You'll be lucky
0 -
This is where the inconsistency is on CT , TF started a thread here ( how do we move on) and it was moved ,but this one is about the use of CT and doesn't get moved , I'm all ears for an explanation
The way I would explain it is that the post about likes is just an observation about people liking posts. It wasn't about whether we should have likes which would have been better in the other section. TF's thread was about, as far as I can see, how the forum develops so it was certainly moved to the correct section.
David
0 -
This is where the inconsistency is on CT , TF started a thread here ( how do we move on) and it was moved ,but this one is about the use of CT and doesn't get moved , I'm all ears for an explanation
The way I would explain it is that the post about likes is just an observation about people liking posts. It wasn't about whether we should have likes which would have been better in the other section. TF's thread was about, as far as I can see, how the
forum develops so it was certainly moved to the correct section.David
DK, I not sure I go along with your explanation,but I apricate you trying to explain, I'm not going to get in to a discussion about moderation ,and will leave it there
0 -
I go in via the latest activity page. You can see likes from posts immediately and check newly listed thread. Just click on red club together on almost top left before discussions.
I never both with the latest avtivity page, I just scroll thro' from the top of the discussions and select the newest in put.
0 -
A 'like', apart from gaining the clickers a point towards their star rating, merely saves one from having to invent an original response to the posting that is not a repetition of an earlier comment.
Saying that must have gained me an extra point!
0 -
A 'like', apart from gaining the clickers a point towards their star rating, merely saves one from having to invent an original response to the posting that is not a repetition of an earlier comment.
Saying that must have gained me an extra point!
Five actually but who's counting?
0 -
A 'like', apart from gaining the clickers a point towards their star rating, merely saves one from having to invent an original response to the posting that is not a repetition of an earlier comment.
Saying that must have gained me an extra point!
Five actually but who's counting?
Me.
0 -
I cannot belive what I'm reading here. Has no one got anything better to do with their time? Anyway, when I read anything that sounds interesting, I like to see what the grammar and spelling is like
Like it tb-belive
0
