Far too expensive

2

Comments

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,134 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited June 12 #32

    The club has said many times that it has no intention of charging for dogs.

  • richardandros
    richardandros Club Member Posts: 2,681 ✭✭✭
    1,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 12 #33

    So you're suggesting that we dog owners should start to subsidise non dog-owners?

    I never have - nor ever will, use a site that charges extra for dogs and if this club ever did that, I would leave immediately as a matter of principle.

  • GEandGJE
    GEandGJE Forum Participant Posts: 507
    100 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 12 #34

    I think it would have the opposite effect with the loss of income from dog owners who now staying away, pitch prices would have to rise to make up the loss.

  • peedee
    peedee Club Member Posts: 9,383
    1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited June 12 #35

    You probably are indirectly paying for dogs and awnings. I don't have a dog and rarely put up an awning, that is what very often makes none Club sites cheaper for me.

    peedee

  • eribaMotters
    eribaMotters Club Member Posts: 1,193 ✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited June 12 #36

    I find it strange that the club does not charge for dogs. Just like humans they produce "waste products" that need disposal. A lot are also noisy, just like some caravan owners, but that is another issue. As such why are they or more correctly the owners not charged as this would put more money into the system which should result in lower pitch fees for those of us who do not own dogs.

     

    Colin

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 13,857 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 12 #37

    To make a difference to lowering the pitch fees any charge for dogs would have to be substantial to make an impact on prices generally. Whilst there will be a modest cost to having dogs on site, waste bin and maintaining dog walks if they exist I can't  see how that would add up to more than 50p or £1 a night, if that? At that level of charging you would have to ask whether the return was worth the effort in the first place. Charging more than it actually costs would just be a punishment to dog owners? No doubt the club would be conscious of the fact that quite a proportion of members are dog owners so for many a different charging routine would just be a quid pro quo as no one would really benefit?

    David

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,134 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited June 12 #38

    With your business head, EM, think about how many people use CAMC sites because they are dog friendly and I suspect quite a lot of folk are club members for that very reason. The dogs bring their owners with them and those owners buy pitch nights. 

    As David suggests, a waste bin and a bit of otherwise unusable scrubland require very little input in terms of finance and manpower.

  • eurortraveller
    eurortraveller Club Member Posts: 6,828 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited June 13 #39

    Afraid not. The dog owners are spending a small fortune on their animals already. My neighbour says it costs her over £1000 a year total - and the dog has lived for 14 years,  I don’t think we should ask her to pay more. Crazy money I think.

  • flatcoat
    flatcoat Forum Participant Posts: 1,571
    1000 Comments
    edited June 13 #40

    As a dog owner I am more than happy to pay for my dog. Plenty of sites charge, and in my experience sur le continent (where everything is apparently perfect) every site I have ever stayed at charges. If you have a dog then be prepared for it to cost you. I don’t expect to be subsidised and don’t expect to subsidise others hobbies and activities (including their children). Dog ownership is not compulsory, it’s a choice. Personally I would prefer it if the club did charge.

    To get back to the OP, if the site fees are too expensive that will be evidenced by end of season occupancy data, income and profit. If the latter is down on the previous year and down against sector trends, then it may evidence the charges are possibly too high. anything else is subjective conjecture. My own view is I suspect this years inclement weather is adversely impacting on last minute bookings that would otherwise boost occupancy levels. 

  • MikeyA
    MikeyA Forum Participant Posts: 1,072
    1000 Comments
    edited June 13 #41

     Using the Knaresborough site as an example, this weekend the charge for a child is £4.10 per night, I am wondering what justifies this cost?  -  Additonal caravan heating will be zero, a shower will be say 50p, additional cooking will be minimal.

    So if the actual costs is around a pound, why are children and dogs not charged a similar amount?

  • flatcoat
    flatcoat Forum Participant Posts: 1,571
    1000 Comments
    edited June 13 #43

    To get back to the OP I agree. Out of all the costs associated with caravanning and even more so with moho’s, the +/- £5/10  night is neither here nor there. Isn’t the point of going away to enjoy oneself, not count the pennies you can’t take with you through the pearly gates? 

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 13,857 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 13 #44

    What justifies the the price is that children are small adults. If you are going to have a system which has a per person charge you have to include children. Don't forget also that I believe children under five are not charged. Its not just the amount of energy that an adult/child will use its also the cost of building and maintaining the facilities in the first place. Lets not forget that many sites have had expensive play areas installed. By contrast the dogs, as far as Club sites are concerned, don't dramatically incur much in the way of extra costs. As I pointed out if you were to base charges on investment in facilities and use of those facilities it would be difficult to justify anything other than a modest charge for dogs. Obviously a charge for dogs and perhaps a limit on the number of dogs would probably be popular with some non dog owners but the Club have to balance that against what would be achieved if there were a charge.

    David

  • MikeyA
    MikeyA Forum Participant Posts: 1,072
    1000 Comments
    edited June 13 #45

    Some of the CCC sites now have have doggy showers with heated water, does the CAMC not have similar offerings?

    It is widely reported that the birth rate in this and many countries is falling, so the CAMC may have to consider another way to raise income, charging for dogs will become a "no brainer".

     

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,134 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited June 13 #46

    Some CAMC sites have bike/wetsuit/surfboard wash points if that’s what you mean.

  • Takethedogalong
    Takethedogalong Forum Participant Posts: 17,031 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 13 #47

    Yeah, we go on sites that always have one. It’s called a kettle and a bucket, and costs us about 3 pence a pop. That’s a gas kettle by the way. It’s that or he’s taken for a beach swim. Which tends to be free………

  • MikeyA
    MikeyA Forum Participant Posts: 1,072
    1000 Comments
    edited June 13 #48

    I don't think you will need warm water for those items. It seems that CAMC dogs are missing out from their CCC cousins expectations.

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,134 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited June 13 #49

    Like you, I’m not a club member so have no idea of the temperature of the water but, unlike you, I'm not much bothered what CAMC have on site as their fees don't affect me. 😋

    Still, it’s good to know you’ve got the dogs' best interests at heart.

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,425 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 15 #50

    Additonal caravan heating will be zero, a shower will be say 50p, additional cooking will be minimal

    Well the same 'argument' could be used for charging extra for adults? Btw my kids always ate more than I did.

  • Cartledge
    Cartledge Forum Participant Posts: 267
    100 Comments
    edited June 15 #51

    A French Perspective.

    We just departed from  a Castel & Camping site, “La Garangoire” in the Vendee after eight days. Booked through the Club, it cost £250 for a 100msq pitch, with water, electricity and drainage, with a private shower, loo and basin with an outside sink. 
    Great restaurant, well stocked shop and pleasant bar. 

    Full of Brits!

    Peter.

  • MikeyA
    MikeyA Forum Participant Posts: 1,072
    1000 Comments
    edited June 15 #52

    When charging for dogs is mentioned,  many people always respond with dog owners will react by going somewhere else and the Club will lose out.

    My simple question is " Where will they go?"  - ISTM the vast percentage of Commercial sites already charge for and limit the number of dogs and they are unlikely to find a free welcome elsewhere. 

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,134 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited June 15 #53

    Of course there are some people who will take every opportunity to jump on the anti dog bandwagon and we know their posts are made with ulterior motives as they simply cannot accept that CAMC has no intention of charging for dogs.

    However, maybe people would go elsewhere, maybe not but they sure bring business to CAMC at present. It gives CAMC an advantage which is probably appreciated by members.

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,425 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 15 #54

    The vast majority of commercial sites charge for dogs? I've just done a check of five large sites and none of which charge for dogs nor limit them Burt.  

    But it's not about what may happen it's about what is happening now. At the moment there is no charge for dogs, so those with dogs will, in my view, choose the club rather than go elsewhere where they are charges (yes they exist but not in the vast numbers or percentage that you claim), so if charges were to be introduced it will be lost income.

    I know you're not bothered being a non member and say you don't use club sites (so why do you want a limit/charge for dogs?) but that could mean higher prices.

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,425 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 15 #55

    Sorry yes, didn't see your post before replying. +1

    Why give up an advantage that brings in business?

  • MikeyA
    MikeyA Forum Participant Posts: 1,072
    1000 Comments
    edited June 15 #57

    I fully understand what you are saying and I accept that if the Club didn't allow dogs then they would lose many caravanners etc. What I don't understand is why charging say £2 per night would make any difference to the numbers on CAMC sites.

    Do you pay for dogs with other holidays providers?

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,134 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited June 15 #58

    I think the whole point is that it’s CAMC policy not to charge for dogs. Why would they want to change something that works? It matters not what other operators do as CAMC are doing their own thing and the members obviously like it.

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,425 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 15 #59

    But as a non member and non club site user why ask yourself such questions or try and understand it at all Burt? It won't affect you in nay way?

    Btw the cottage we've just returned from had no extra charge for dogs. actually it said pets

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited June 15 #60

    "Do you pay for dogs with other holidays providers?"

    Good question - and one I can readily answer! Since we stopped caravanning 4 years ago, we have been using a mixture of cottages,  hotels and B&B's. And it's easy to find places that don't charge for dogs. In fact, it seems to be a growing trend - maybe a reflection of more families staying in the UK for holidays. We've got some really good deals through a company called Pets Pyjamas who specialise in UK hotels and cottages where dogs stay free. Mind you, the last cottage we used did charge us an extra £10 for the week (and that was with 2 dogs.)

  • KjellNN
    KjellNN Club Member Posts: 8,664 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited June 15 #61

    Judging by the discount given for a child when a non-electric pitch is used on the selected sites offering this option, the Club reckons a child uses between  an extra 10p and 30p of electricity per night.