Is it a rip off?
Comments
-
Hmm. Then you’d have to generally increase prices to fund your discounts and to cover disposal of the boxes. 🤔
1 -
he also repainted?
0 -
As the increase is 5% for 2020 and was slightly over that this year, I would say it is starting to move towards the excessive, at least to folk that are getting nowhere near that sort of increase to their income.
However that aside, fully booked BH's mean nothing, it's the rest of the year that I question. I have never noticed before because we have never booked at the last minute during the summer holidays. When we did so last summer, there were only 2 sites where we could get a booking of more than a week within 200 miles or so of home. They were Bridlington and Malvern. The latter is perhaps not so surprising, the former being a coastal site during a summer heat wave, suggestive of overpricing.
2 -
That would not only be unethical and dishonest as it would be purporting to be something it wasn’t but would also be a real rip off! 😆
0 -
which looks worse? 5% or 70p? Always a problem with percentages.
Maybe BH do mean a lot, they show they can fill sites and maybe subsidise the leaner times? It also shows the club that SP are more popular than standard even though the price is higher? It is all HS so it cannot be for that reason that people are going for SP here?
Why would a heatwave matter? Do people suddenly think they'll go away? You did because you could, but a lot of people still work and could not. You could because you were in range as well.
Perhaps also likely is that people have already booked somewhere else in advance? And Bridlington, with all the best will in the world and I personally like it, is hardly a tourist spot for advance bookings? For me though it is more of a goto site for smaller holidays and not my 'two weeks' main holiday away. A coastal site, yes but usually colder and damp, even in summer.
Anyway is the competition doing any better around it?
0 -
Bridlington is £35.50, two local sites:
Flowers of May, £32 and +£3 awning, + £1 per dog = £36
South Cliff, £33 standard £37 for a SP.
Not too far away from the club's prices?
is the club prices worth the extra? well looking at the pictures of those sites - yes +1, but you decide.
0 -
Don't know about the competition CT, we didn't look. We are in the fortunate position of being able to afford the prices and like club sites. We did look at Scarborough though, over £4 cheaper a night, and we couldn't get more than a couple of nights.
I also think you are wrong about folk going away on a whim. Last year was exceptional, due to my cataract opp we ended up going away much later than normal. We don't normally do peak. However, now we have a MH and it's so easy to nip away, I can see we will be doing it a lot. A bit of good weather and we'll be away for 2 / 3 days. I am sure we will not be alone in this.
0 -
indeed, (thanks for answering though it was rhetorical btw) but it shows the club's prices are not far away from the local (inferior) sites. If there was a huge difference then the club might be wrong. (but technically impossible)
We are all different - I wouldn't question or think about the price if I liked it, just be happy I'm on site.
0 -
well now you do
Not alone but most can't apart from weekends and their main summer holiday. That's why BH/weekends are fuller I would think.
I suppose it depends who are the main users of club sites? working folk or not? The club might know and base their prices on that?
0 -
If anyone is familiar with the Accor group of hotels, there have a variety of brands from Formula 1, through Ibis, Mercure up to the top brand and priced accordingly. The gripe from many appears to be that they are getting Ibis facilities at Mercure or Accor prices when comparing with commercial sites.
In analysis, a club site provides a pitch, a EHU, a toilet block and perhaps a dog walk. Hardly extensive facilities, yet commanding what is perceived as a fairly premium price.
3 -
Personally CY I am content to pay more for less. I don't particularly want bars or restaurants. I can even do without the swimming pool, I do enough of that when at home. A pleasant base for walking and exploring with a good facilities block, is all we ask.
1 -
In analysis, a club site provides a pitch, a EHU, a toilet block and perhaps a dog walk. Hardly extensive facilities, yet commanding what is perceived as a fairly premium price.
The point is though Cyber, that,for many, the club provides exactly what they want. What do you think that I might be missing out on in the way of more extensive facilities? Well for me the answer is 'nothing'. What do you feel to be missing?
1 -
"In analysis, a club site provides a pitch, a EHU, a toilet block and perhaps a dog walk. Hardly extensive facilities, yet commanding what is perceived as a fairly premium price."
Those facilities are all we, and many others apparently, require from a site. If we wanted a pool, restaurant, bar etc, obviously we'd look elsewhere. The claim that prices are "perceived" as "premium" is spurious to say the least. As I mentioned earlier, we find that club prices are at about the median for similar sites in an area. I've yet to see any conclusive evidence otherwise.
0 -
"In analysis, a club site provides a pitch, a EHU, a toilet block and perhaps a dog walk. Hardly extensive facilities, yet commanding what is perceived as a fairly premium price."
I’m building up the impression that your view of club sites has changed since you swapped to a MH, CY. Has your way of touring or your use of sites changed in some way? I’d be interested to learn what’s brought about this seeming change and altered your thinking.
3 -
+1 Tinny, quite a change👍🏻😊
1 -
There’s no problem, Micky. Only an observation and interest.👍🏻
0 -
Just a general comment. Is it a rip off? It all depends on one's own perspective, past experiences and one's understanding of what constitutes a rip off. These can change over time and whether one believes they are now being forced to make a choice. Opinions change.
0 -
A few years ago I tended to go with the view that there wasn't anything wrong with club prices but now I'm not so convinced. I agree with CY about what the club provides on a site. It's fairly basic in all respects and although I'm happy with "basic" I'm surprised at the rising costs on some sites as there's no "added value" and in the case of leased sites some quite ageing facilities.
4 -
I find that as far as the actual sites go the club does what it does to a standard that suits me. I agree sites are starting to become expensive but that seems to be the case with most providers at the times we go. Often when looking at alternatives there are many that really do not appeal to me.
I have no interest in such deals as 3 for 2 nights unless on a site that is where I want to be and when I want to be there.
1 -
For me a rip off is when I think I am buying a reasonable standard for the price I am paying and then it turns out that the product is poor quality. With CC I know the quality of the goods and that I will be happy with the provision.
When I stayed for my regular 15 nights at Southport last December the Christmas week was expensive. There was no cheaper alternative that suited me as well however.
3 -
If folk really genuinely think the club is charging "premium" prices or pricing working families out, I'd suggest a little research - compare the price for a family (say 2 adults, 2 children, van and awning) during the school summer holidays at the club's Treamble Valley site with those for nearby "family friendly" sites such as Haven Perran Sands, Trevornick at Holywell Bay, or Hendra at Newquay!
4 -
A bit like the climate change lobby I guess🙄😝😝
2 -
Just my observation - If this post is based purely on the number of posters participating in this discussion then I feel it is a misleading post as they are a very small number of the whole membership.
I am satisfied with what the club sites provide and I personally do not feel it is a ‘rip off’ as I know in advance that what I pay for will be what I require at a price I am prepared to pay. Site occupancy appear good when we are out and about so guess many other members are also satisfied.
6