Hobby Caravans on CAMC sites

2»

Comments

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #32

    Not aimed at you David. I am not opposed to the odd good humoured dig but there does seem to have been a few too many of late.

    I think JVB might have been referring to 'As the site was had lots of vacancies (in spite of showing full on the website) our 3 Hobby vans accounted for about 50% of the actual caravans'. 

    No idea which site you were on David but if it showed full then 6 vans on site does seem surprising. 

  • Unknown
    Unknown Forum Participant
    edited March 2019 #33
    The user and all related content has been Deleted User
  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #34

    That makes more sense now David. smile

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #35

    If as I posted on another thread  ,you had queried the "facts?"that you had advised about the site you were staying on (which you did not)then you would have found out (as i did this week)the reasons for the anomally in the site occupancy figures, wink and i did noy say you were a liar ,on any post ,but as usual your post as others was inaccurate yell

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #36

    Don't know why you should say that David's post was inaccurate. He indicates that there were a dozen or so outfits on site.

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #37

     Et I think you need to read ADs past posts to get the facts about the reason for ADs comments about the figiures it is not how many were on site that is wrong it was the inaccurate  reasonundecided

  • huskydog
    huskydog Club Member Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #38

    this gets more like a school playground everyday undecidedyell

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #39

    Initially he did not give a reason. 

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #40

    Short memory again undecided

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,402 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #41

    Steady on, HD, that's a bit insulting (to school playgrounds!) laughing

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #42

     On another post he thought he ound a "problem" with the booking system but failed,to as a lot of posters seem to check with the site staff before posting the Inaccuracy  wink

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #43

    I don't see the relevance or importance JVB. I would assume that if a site was showing full when only half full that there was a problem somewhere. I would not worry what the reason was. 

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2019 #44

    I do not worry either but as I stated, and we all know that the way information is posted on here at times gives a false impression of the true facts ,as was queried earlier but then? surprised

Categories