Use of disabled facilities

13»

Comments

  • huskydog
    huskydog Club Member Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited June 2018 #62

    No one should have to justify which toilet they need to use ,just to carry out a natural bodily function .

    my wife needs to use them ,but she doesn't have a list of reasons hanging round her neck for all to see 

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,142 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited June 2018 #63

    Well said, Husky.

    We have seen some discriminatory comments demonstrating a complete lack of understanding and consideration, and your words make a welcome change. 👍

  • Navigateur
    Navigateur Club Member Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited June 2018 #64

    While the thread is still open, can I say that I think that what is less than able is not our fellow humans, but the facilities provided.

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,142 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited June 2018 #65

    Do you think so, Nav?

    I find them completely satisfactory but, as I’ve said, I’m not one with a visible disability so maybe wheelchair users, for example, have a different view. 

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited June 2018 #66

    I have yet to find any cc sites with less than good facilties for disabled what ever the problems could be

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited June 2018 #67

    I think in the majority of instances a wheelchair users would have access problems hence the dedicated room found I think on all cc sites at least,   I was in a wheelchair for just over 6 months    ,our caravan was brought to site by friends, to enable us to continue to use it, I had far more problems useing the caravan than the site facilties  which did give OH a brief respite from the problems of me useing the facilties at home,and I now find that depending on how I feel there is both types of facility available when away,and I know that what ever  cc site we use I can cope which we have found is not so elsewhere

  • Takethedogalong
    Takethedogalong Forum Participant Posts: 17,046 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 2018 #68

    Just as an aside from the letter debate, we have used some excellent small private sites, ex CL in some cases, that have had superb wet rooms designed as part of the ablutions blocks. Spacious, easy to use, lots of different aids, including showering chairs, stools etc..... Good to know they are inclusive sites. 

    The only time we have used the loo designed for disabled is when the main toilet blocks have been closed for cleaning on Club Sites, and I understand this is what the Club expects folks to do. The modified shower cubicles in the main block are usually just that......tiny bit bigger, door might open out rather than in, couple of hand rails, a shower stool and a flexible rather than fixed shower head. (During a week spent on Yellowcraig one school holiday week, two flexible shower heads disappeared, stolen. Says it all really.) 

    Its really got nothing to do with anyone else which loo a person chooses to use. Those who think it has perhaps are way out of date in terms of disability discrimination, and might find themselves on the wrong side of the law if they choose to make an issue and want to challenge someone. There are still a lot of companies with a lot of catching up to do in terms of access for those with special needs. The Club does its best with old sites and old ablutions facilities, and no doubt would be happy to discuss, in private, if a visitor needed a bit more help. It sounds like some of the visiting members could do with a course on discrimination if the letter is an example of who is using sites!

  • bandgirl
    bandgirl Forum Participant Posts: 440
    100 Comments
    edited June 2018 #69

    I recently joined the IBS Network.  I received a “Can’t wait” card, and was able to purchase a Radar key from them (to my surprise).  I’ve suffered with IBS-D since my teenage years, now in my late fifties, and there’s been countless times when I’ve needed a toilet in a hurry, and there being none available.  Knowing I could use a disabled access toilet, in desperate circumstances, is a great relief as anxiety about not having access to a toilet exacerbates the problem, and sometimes there’s a disabled toilet, but no general ones (some railway stations, for example) where I’ve been known to plead with staff to let me use it.   It’s a vicious circle and sometimes I’m all ready to go out, then have to change my plans at the last minute/cancel, because my symptoms occur.

     I’ll always use ordinary facilities, if available, but I can’t tell you how reassuring it is to know that I have this to fall back on.  Just an example of a hidden need.

  • mickysf
    mickysf Forum Participant Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited June 2018 #70

    It's not good or helpful mind that radar keys are available very cheaply to everyone via Amazon and the like. 

  • Takethedogalong
    Takethedogalong Forum Participant Posts: 17,046 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 2018 #71

    Thank you for sharing BG, as you rightly point out, sometimes needs are not obvious. Good for yousmile

  • MDD10
    MDD10 Forum Participant Posts: 335
    edited June 2018 #72

    Said a couple of times on this thread but yes, not all disabilities are visible, and sometimes people have temporarily conditions.  I put three discs out in my back a few years ago (putting the awning up and doing the classic bending and twisting). 9 months of agony but ironically the only pain free time was when stood upright and walking.  Anyone seeing me walk into the block would have thought I was fine but was far from it!

    Thankfully im ok now, but I don’t make assumptions about people’s conditions,  although having read the letter the writer does make the point that the person admitted they were not disabled.  However I don’t think the writer should really have been having that conversation.  I would have been extremely cross to have to justify myself when I was suffering enough!

  • Unknown
    Unknown Forum Participant
    edited June 2018 #73
    The user and all related content has been deleted
  • Phishing
    Phishing Forum Participant Posts: 597
    500 Comments
    edited June 2018 #74

    I really do think you are missing the point.

    The I am more disabled, deserving, need, arguments just dont hold water, there is no national grading of disability. Nobody has the right to question any other persons use of their chosen facility. I accept this may be through need or just pure selfish reasons but they have the right to pee wherever they want, they have paid their site fees and are therefore entitled to equal use of the facilities.

    Aiming anger at someone who you have judged less deserving of the facilities is wrong and discriminatory. 

    I accept the people have many and varied needs but this does not extend the right to reserved bathroom facilities.

    The issue is not the use of certain bathrooms or who is entitled to a key but is the result of poor availability of facilities for all to use.

    If you have to wait or can not get use of an appropriate facility then complain to the site. Give them a poor review, insist on speaking the management, and explain this to them. If you are booking a site then ask how many adapted facilities they have, if its one for 200 pitches then tell them you wont be booking and why.

    It is a sad reality the whilst legislation say these facilities must be provided it does not insist on a general uplift of specification. 

    I have been a few sites where all the facilities were adapted for use by all, this should be the target.

     

  • Unknown
    Unknown Forum Participant
    edited June 2018 #75
    The user and all related content has been deleted
  • Phishing
    Phishing Forum Participant Posts: 597
    500 Comments
    edited July 2018 #76

    WayTo, sorry, my reply was not aimed as a response to your post but to the general discussion.

    Your point was very valid and well made.

     

  • Unknown
    Unknown Forum Participant
    edited July 2018 #77
    The user and all related content has been deleted
  • cyberyacht
    cyberyacht Forum Participant Posts: 10,218
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2018 #78

    Utilisation of any type of facility is subject to the constraint of "when you gotta go, you gotta go". Subtleties of political correctness often take second place in such circumstances.

  • PATMAU
    PATMAU Forum Participant Posts: 250
    edited July 2018 #79

    My OH can walk to and from the toilet block no problem, but he has a radar key and he needs access to a cubicle with toilet and washing facilities.  I don't propose to expand on why on here, but I thought the mag letter writer was blinkered in thinking what constitutes a disability.  I am glad to see that now most disabled cubicles carry the sign that not all disabilities are visible.

  • Navigateur
    Navigateur Club Member Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited July 2018 #80

    I see I did not use enough words in my earlier post to make my point clear. I contend that ALL the facilities on site should be to a design and construction that makes them suited to all persons, whether they bring a disability with them or not.

    Fancy finishes and scrupliously clean does not get past the idiocy of the design with different facilities in seperate small cupboards. To complete the "Three Ss" requires three different boxes, none of which have a decent amount of space. The "disabled" facilities that I have looked into have equipment for all three functions in the same area, and probably occupy about the same amount of floor space overall.

    They are also (generally) non-gendered. Seperate public toilets is somthing that is based on social conditioning, not on meeting needs. I do not have seperate male and female toilets in my home - and probably neither do you. Some sites have installed unisex toilets that are equiped with all three facilities in the same room, and they seem to be used without difficulty by persons of all genders and abilities.

  • old ludlovian
    old ludlovian Forum Participant Posts: 132
    edited June 2021 #81

    some people have bowel props and need disabled toilet 

  • mickysf
    mickysf Forum Participant Posts: 6,474 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited June 2021 #82

    The vast majority of disabled facilities appear to be unisex. Sometimes it is necessary for partners of the opposite sex, or same, also need to enter to assist. I see no physical reason why all facilities could not be designed appropriately to accommodate us all.

  • harryb
    harryb Forum Participant Posts: 1,536
    1000 Comments
    edited June 2021 #83

     Since this post started three years ago I have now got a clinical condition that requires the use of the full disabled room. I don't look disabled, I could run to the loo but it's the procedure that I need to carry out that requires the space and conditions of a disabled facility. So as no doubt will have been mentioned before, you don't need to be physically disabled to need that facility.