Nose weight too high

1356

Comments

  • Lutz
    Lutz Forum Participant Posts: 1,564 ✭✭✭✭
    edited June 2018 #62

    The ex-works noseweight, just like the MIRO, is specific to each and every caravan. It depends on the equipment fitted as standard and to a certain extent on material weight tolerances. The manufacturer would therefore actually have to check the noseweight on every caravan as it leaves the production line. Figures in brochures or other publications can therefore be nothing more than a rough guide.

  • Fysherman
    Fysherman Forum Participant Posts: 1,570
    1000 Comments
    edited June 2018 #63

    They could simply do what they used to do for decades, give the ex works noseweight to +/- 4%.

    The club even used to insist upon it or they would not do a road test for the magazine. (En Route)

    I recently took a noseweight gauge and measured 2 brand new 2018 caravans that I HAD been interested in and both were under 30kg! Meaning you had to add weight to the front end to get the noseweight safe for towing. Given the measly total habitation allowance of around 125kg the caravans were a joke and potentially an accident waiting to happen for an inexperienced purchaser.

     Might explain the popularity of the inbuilt Alko stabiliser with manufacturers! Cheaper than putting the axle where it should have been just to get the beds in.

  • JohnM20
    JohnM20 Forum Participant Posts: 1,416
    1000 Comments
    edited June 2018 #64

    I've just checked the nose-weight of my 'van loaded ready for the off. With the EHU cable at the back of the 'van the nose-weight is 95kg, at the front of the 'van it is 100kg so, yes, it does make an appreciable difference.

  • jennyc
    jennyc Forum Participant Posts: 957
    500 Comments
    edited June 2018 #65

    Thanks, we do too. But don’t tell cornersteady, he’s still struggling with the maths.

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,149 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited June 2018 #66

    You forgot the smiley. surprised

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,431 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 2018 #67

    don't have trouble with the maths at all JC, just the fact that you either didn't (or can't) explain it well and made a few minor errors smile

    I did say you were almost there and actually it what most GCSE students would have said.

  • jennyc
    jennyc Forum Participant Posts: 957
    500 Comments
    edited June 2018 #68

    Sorry Corners, I assumed a more elevated level of understanding than GCSE on CT. I’d have laid out the logic in smaller steps if I’d realised that some would find my explanation difficult to understand. Perhaps you should think in these simple, non mathematical terms - remove a unit of weight from the front of your van floor, and the nose weight will reduce. Now place it a similar distance behind the axle (fulcrum)  and the nose weight will further reduce by the same amount. I promise that it really does work for any item, cables, awnings, barrels whatever. I’ve been doing it since the late 1970s, and we have similar testimonies on this thread too.

  • PITCHTOCLOSE
    PITCHTOCLOSE Forum Participant Posts: 658
    500 Comments
    edited June 2018 #69

    Well said.

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,431 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 2018 #70

    mmm, You are almost correct, the nose weight will differ on where you put the additional weight, I never said differently, but have you considered the centre of mass in all of this?

     

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,431 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 2018 #71

    Help us out hooker then, so a weight at the front will increase nose weight by an amount say 3kg, and somewhere at the back will reduce the nose weight by another amount say 3kg, so +3 to -3 at which point on the line from front to back will this weight have zero 'effect' on nose weight?  

  • jennyc
    jennyc Forum Participant Posts: 957
    500 Comments
    edited June 2018 #72

    The centre of mass or centre of gravity on caravans, is close to the axle and above the caravan floor, but well under a meter. In the case of our own caravan, that’s about 30 cwt or 1,500 Kg. If perfectly balanced ie with 0 Kg on the tow bar, that CofG would be perfectly poised, vertically above the fulcrum (axle). But in practice we don’t tow like that because we need +ve noseweight. So we load the caravan in such a way that the C of G is shifted ever so slightly in front of the axle. But the attitude of the caravan needs to remain the same, which is achieved by coupling it to the car’s hitch, which these days is more or less the same for all cars. Shifting small items inside the van will affect the position of the C of G, but by a very very small amount because 5Kg, for example, is a tiny percentage of 1,500Kg overall van weight. And as long as that CofG remains very close to vertically above the axle and the van remains horizontal then we only need to consider the mass of the item moved. To gain an idea of how finely balanced a van is when towing measure your van’s weight with a proper nose weight gauge, which is manufactured to replicate the height of a standard hitch. Now raise the hitch by placing a 4” block under the gauge. Raising the hitch has the effect of rotating the van so that the CofG moves very, very slightly backwards. You’ll find that you’ve reduced the nose weight by about 5Kg by using a 4” block. Which is why nose weight gauge manufacturers tell you to measure on a level surface. To look at things slightly differently, think of an athlete tossing the caber. It’s controllable while it’s CofG is close to vertical over his hands, but as it starts to fall, the CofG moves far enough that it’s no longer possible to balance it, but while close to vertical he can maintain that balance by small adjustments of his hands. So, in conclusion, the centre of mass has most effect when the hitch is raised or lowered. The nose weight is most affected by shifting the load on a level caravan.

  • jennyc
    jennyc Forum Participant Posts: 957
    500 Comments
    edited June 2018 #73

    When it’s over the axle/ fulcrum.

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,431 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 2018 #74

    err no. That is behind the centre of mass/gravity, which in a caravan is always forward of the axle and therefore will have a clockwise turning effect (aka moments) about it and reduce the nose weight. Anything behind the CoM will reduce nose weight, anything in front of the CoM will increase it.

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,431 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 2018 #75

    So we load the caravan in such a way that the C of G is shifted ever so slightly in front of the axle

    we don't do anything, caravans are designed to have a CoM well in front of the axle even before we put stuff in it

    take refresher course Jenny, you have contradicted your earlier postsmile

  • Navigateur
    Navigateur Club Member Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited June 2018 #76

    I have read most of the posts in this thread, and nothing explains why my twin axle often lifts the jockey wheel when using the motor mover, It is a Bailey and most folk would probably accept that they could have used anti-matter in the construction.

  • jennyc
    jennyc Forum Participant Posts: 957
    500 Comments
    edited June 2018 #77

    OK Corners, you are clearly set on an argument and I really can’t be bothered to feed your needs in that department, any more.

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,431 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 2018 #78

    where is the motor mover? and are there two? Does this happen going forwards and/or backwards?

    It sounds like the mover is trying to turn the caravan towards the rear? If there are two movers then they maybe not be applying the same turning effect on their particular tyres and there will be resultant moment.

    Also it would be remiss of me to mention that, while we don't know for sure, it is thought that anti-matter has weight, more or less than 'equivalent normal matter, but not 'negative' weight, it only has a different charge.

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,431 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 2018 #79

    no problem Jenny, feed my needs? lol. More like you can't admit you might be wrong?wink

    But in all the laws of physics I've studied you are, the whole weight of an object acts through its CoM.

    nice to have talked with you

  • PITCHTOCLOSE
    PITCHTOCLOSE Forum Participant Posts: 658
    500 Comments
    edited June 2018 #80

    Don't blame you,👍

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,431 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 2018 #81

    hey Hooker, notice you didn't answer my question?smile

  • PITCHTOCLOSE
    PITCHTOCLOSE Forum Participant Posts: 658
    500 Comments
    edited June 2018 #82

    Would not wish to encourage you in any form. It becomes boring.😎

  • hitchglitch
    hitchglitch Forum Participant Posts: 3,007
    1000 Comments
    edited June 2018 #83

    That comment is unreasonable. Jennyc says clearly that the CofG is just forward of the axle which we know it has to be to give some unloaded noseweight. In fact it is so close to the axle as to be over it as a reasonable approximation.

    Our Bailey Valencia, 1500kg, had an unladen noseweight of just over 75kg. Assuming the distance from  axle to hitch was approx. 4m then the C of G would have been just 20cm forward of the axle.

  • Freddy55
    Freddy55 Club Member Posts: 1,810
    1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited June 2018 #84

    Is it safe? 😀

  • PITCHTOCLOSE
    PITCHTOCLOSE Forum Participant Posts: 658
    500 Comments
    edited June 2018 #85

    Better ask know all.😀

  • jennyc
    jennyc Forum Participant Posts: 957
    500 Comments
    edited June 2018 #86

    Thanks Hitch, that’s the same sort of result that I calculate. But corners also tells us that the point of zero influence on nose weight is the centre of mass, while a little consideration tells us that weight in front of the fulcrum/ axle will add downforce to the hitch, while any weight behind the fulcrum will create an upward force on the hitch. Both regardless of where the centre of mass is. I think that, while my earlier posts were meant to assist the OP. corners embarked on an unfortunate series of put downs, which has clouded his logic.

    I think that it’s difficult on CT to balance unfounded opinion with substantive fact. Does it matter that one post told us that aluminium burns? Or that another fears dogs puncturing air awnings through bites? Maybe not, but when misconceptions are published, they can all to easily be taken as fact. Whether correct or not.

    Thanks again.

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,149 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited June 2018 #87

    Surely no one takes what they read on a forum such as this as fact?

    I’ve read the most awful advice on forums - some of it downright dangerous - and it’s often those who talk the talk and sound as if they're experts who actually spin the biggest yarns. They like to talk over the heads of us mere mortals. frown

  • Rocky 2 buckets
    Rocky 2 buckets Forum Participant Posts: 7,101
    1000 Comments
    edited June 2018 #88

    Scales & lump of wood, wood from hitch to scales, ensure it’s less than the max weight allowed. . . .Jobs a good un👍🏻. No peeing contests & no spats. . . .Sweet😊

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,431 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 2018 #89

    But corners also tells us that the point of zero influence on nose weight is the centre of mass, while a little consideration tells us that weight in front of the fulcrum/ axle will add downforce to the hitch, while any weight behind the fulcrum will create an upward force on the hitch

    absolute nonsense. From years of teaching and studying mechanics to degree level and beyond you are completely wrong, the centre of mass is the point where you could balance the caravan on your finger if you were strong enough, add weight behind it and the van try and tip backwards, and it reduce the nose weight, add in front the caravan will try and tip forwards. 

    like I said you are making a schoolboy/girl error by taking moments about the axle,  get a refresher course in how to calculate moments.  

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited June 2018 #90

    You mean, those that can ..... do. Those that can't  ...... innocentwink

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,431 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited June 2018 #91

    so.. you mean everything you were ever taught was taught to you by someone who couldn't? smile