Club Rules

LPC
LPC Forum Participant Posts: 38
edited May 2018 in Club Membership #1

In truth the club should forget rules and let the members do what ever they want as they do anyway. I am I heavy user of sites and find that:- 

Members speed around with no consideration to others.

Let their dogs roam without a lead.

If on a lead it is more than the length specified.

Let the dogs foul the site even if there is a dog walk. I see them sneaking around with their dogs waiting them to do their "business" no matter if it is a grass pitch that children will occupy next. 

Let their children play ball etc near other members outfits and let them irritate others whilst getting a warm glow with beer and wine.

Children going around site at high speed on their bikes even the wrong way round.

Have raucous gathering late into the late evening/ early morning.

The Club should either suspend members breaking the Club rules or relax the rules

Moderator Comment - Moved as this is a moan rather than a story!

 

 

 

 

 

 

«13

Comments

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,138 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited May 2018 #2

    That’s not a story, it’s a complaint.

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,426 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited May 2018 #3

    The only two which I've really never seen is:

    Let their children play ball etc near other members outfits and let them irritate others whilst getting a warm glow with beer and wine.

    Disgraceful letting children drink beer and winesmile

    but seriously :

    Have raucous gathering late into the late evening/ early morning

    I have never seen or heard that.

     

    Did you take these to a warden? Also suspend them after how many offences? And how are these offences to be recorded?

     

  • Unknown
    Unknown Forum Participant
    edited May 2018 #4
    The user and all related content has been Deleted User
  • Milothedog
    Milothedog Forum Participant Posts: 1,433
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2018 #5

    Seeing as the subject of rules is being discussed. I was surprised to see for the first time on a club site last week the arrival & departure times being relaxed a little ? Outfits coming on site before 10am and leaving as late as 6pm. Didn't seem to inconvenience anyone cool

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2018 #6

    That  is not unusual several left here yesterday between 1800&1900hrs

     

  • Vulcan
    Vulcan Forum Participant Posts: 670
    edited May 2018 #7

    How do you know they were not leaving early?

  • Oneputt
    Oneputt Club Member Posts: 9,144 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited May 2018 #8

    Couldn't possibly comment although we always bring all the empty cans and bottles away with us as we are ashamed that other members might accuse us of enjoying ourselveswinksurprised

  • Kennine
    Kennine Forum Participant Posts: 3,472
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2018 #9

    If the CMC is not bothered when site rules are broken,  they should be honest and scrap rules all together.  Then every customer will know exactly where they stand.  undecided

  • Navigateur
    Navigateur Club Member Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2018 #10

    The rules are there for a different reason. The Club more or less turns a blind eye to any infringement as doing something would take up valuable warden time. 

    The real purpose in them being there is to cover the Club's back should any legal action result from a breach. For example, when one of the wrong-way speed cycling children is injured, the Club can say they had taken action by having a Rule that was then broken, and they are not liable.  Same with the dents in the side of you caravan. The Club denies liability.

  • Kennine
    Kennine Forum Participant Posts: 3,472
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2018 #11

    Good point N.  You got a "like" from me.

    smile

  • Oneputt
    Oneputt Club Member Posts: 9,144 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited May 2018 #12

    Agree to an extent Nav but if the complainant used CT as evidence the years of complaint on the lack of action by wardens may well result in something the club could regret.  It would really be interesting to see what the 'risk assessments' say.smile 

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,138 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited May 2018 #13

    It’s strange that this thread was started in stories at the same time as two reviews appeared complaining about wardens enforcing rules. 

    It goes to show that the wardens can’t please everyone. 

  • Navigateur
    Navigateur Club Member Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2018 #14

    I've never seen anything on CT that could be thought of as anywhere near proof that action was not taken. The best it ever gets is anecdotal evidence that a particular individual was unaware of any action.

    "Case dismissed. Next!"

  • compass362
    compass362 Forum Participant Posts: 619
    500 Comments
    edited May 2018 #15

    Oh lovely .....its been a while ...the haters are back😱 .....it must be the hot sunny weather😎 we have been having .....if you dont wear a hat it ...its tends to fry the brain .👦

    Hope all you non haters .....enjoy your days away .👍

    I certainly will 😇

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2018 #16

    I do not BUT neither does the opcool but then does not bother me eitherwink

  • Rocky 2 buckets
    Rocky 2 buckets Forum Participant Posts: 7,101
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2018 #17

    +1 OP, any provable negligence is good evidence. You see the S/mkts signs-‘vehicles are left at owners risk’ but if you can prove not enough was done to protect owners property then the S/mkts are responsible. 

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2018 #18

    Then there is the wardens take on the "lack of action"as normally it is via the site comments book when said complaint is made (with of course no name given, a negative site reveiw a letter from HO or as  a complaint on one of the public forumsundecided

  • PhilHeller
    PhilHeller Forum Participant Posts: 267
    100 Comments
    edited May 2018 #19

    I thought I recognised LPC, this is the same poster that raged about inconsiderate dog owners on a Scottish site letting them bark all day. Serial fiction story teller, I think the mods should have left this in stories😛

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,138 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited May 2018 #20
  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,426 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited May 2018 #21

    well done Phil and TW

  • JollyKernow
    JollyKernow Forum Participant Posts: 2,629
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2018 #22

    Mods,

    Move this back into the story section as the op does talk a lot of fictionwink.

    If you like reading books we could start at page 272 of the club handbookfoot-in-mouth

    JK

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 13,857 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited May 2018 #23

    JK

    Interesting that the OP has not returned to join in the discussion. Unfortunately we get lots of things posted in the Story Section which shouldn't be there so it was a choice of moving it or deleting it. We all make mistakessmile

    David

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,138 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited May 2018 #24

    Perhaps we should have a new section for tall stories? laughing

  • Kennine
    Kennine Forum Participant Posts: 3,472
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2018 #25

    As a CMC employee JK, derogatory remarks about a CMC member is not considered good practice. 

    All the points raised by the OP have all been raised many times on this forum over the years, so there is no fiction involved.  As a CMC on- site employee, perhaps you can enlighten us all, why members are still experiencing the examples as described by the op. 

    wink

     

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,138 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited May 2018 #26

    It's clear to me, K, that JK runs his site well so none of these events happen.

    Derogatory comments? Hardly. Without any fact to back up the moans - not even a site name - I think we can all be forgiven for assuming it’s fiction. 

    Perhaps when, or if, the club allows you to rejoin, you’ll be able to check out the sites for yourself. You can even visit JK's site. wink

     

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,426 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited May 2018 #27

    +1

  • Kennine
    Kennine Forum Participant Posts: 3,472
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2018 #28

    If and when I decide that I want to be a customer of  CMC goods and services again, I might visit JK's site -- Which site is he on by the way ?. It will be good to see a "perfect" (according to you)  CMC site. So spill the beans, which site are you talking about ?.   You are obviously denying that the points raised by the OP have never been raised on this forum before.  That is totally incorrect, all the op's points have been aired many times on here, if you cast your memory back, I'm sure you'll agree. 

     

    smile

     

     

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,138 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited May 2018 #29

    I’m "obviously denying" nothing in regards to issues being raised on this forum, K, only sharing the doubt concerning the OP with others.

    You’ve clearly not picked up the clues regarding JK's site. I’m sure he'll spill the beans if you ask him nicely. laughing

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2018 #31

    Talking about site rules, we are etting conflicting information about the lenght of dog leads on site in the information published it states that a max of 3mtrs but on the last site we were on the site staff were insisting it is now 2 mtrs and were being quite "insitant "undecidedwhen talking to members with no information as to when it "changed?"