Noseweight advice

1246

Comments

  • lornalou1
    lornalou1 Forum Participant Posts: 2,169
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2017 #92

    i think what Lutz is saying ( to put it in a simple way) is that if the nose was lifted so that it was directly above the axle then it would have no weight as its on the same centre line/pivot point. I think that if your nose was at your towing height and at the correct weight than 6" higher or 6" lower would not make a difference to the original weight. .

  • Lutz
    Lutz Forum Participant Posts: 1,564 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November 2017 #93

    I'm not ignoring the weight of the baby at all. Its weight is still being supported by the pivot of the see saw.

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,427 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited November 2017 #94

    As long as you leave the baby in mid air no force is being applied at the baby's end

    Sorry how can you write that, really no force is being applied at the baby's end

    So be clear you are saying there is no vertical force being applied or pushing down from the baby on the see saw seat? No Weight = mass x g? Have you ever drawn a force diagram?

    As I said you cannot make the weight of an object disappear just because it is being supported elsewhere (which is what I said a few pages ago). There is always a weight on the nose (just like the baby). What the resultant of that force is of course is a whole different matter. That resultant can be zero but that force is always there. Just because the resultant is zero does not mean you can just ignore it, that is sloppy maths/physics and could lead to serious errors.

    If you said the resultant noseweight is zero that is fine and perfectly accurate and in accordance with Newtonian physics. Just saying the noseweight is zero is not. 

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,427 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited November 2017 #95

    but how would you calculate the force on the pivot if you don't take the vertical force acting on the baby, if as you say there  no force is being applied at the baby's end.

    See sloppy wording and which could lead to working leading to errors.

  • Lutz
    Lutz Forum Participant Posts: 1,564 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November 2017 #96

    The weight of the baby results in a couple in one direction around the pivot point of the see saw. The weight of the heavy chap results in a couple in the opposite direction. The difference between the two is the moment (or torque) necessary to bring the see saw back to a state of equilibrium. Knowing the length of the lever (in the case of a caravan the distance between the axle and the hitch) one can calculate the force necessary to provide such a moment about the axle. That force is the noseweight. Noseweight is always an applied external force. The forces within the see saw system are of no concern. In the case of a towed caravan the towball only perceives the external force, not what goes on with the caravan chassis.

  • lornalou1
    lornalou1 Forum Participant Posts: 2,169
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2017 #97

    so is somebody saying that if the baby was sat on scales on the seesaw the scales would read zero. can't see that.

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2017 #98

    This discussion seems to be coming surreal 

  • Metheven
    Metheven Club Member Posts: 3,987 ✭✭✭
    1,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited November 2017 #99

    I love it cool Just hope no-one gives up without revealing the correct answer laughing Then again, how would I know frown

  • huskydog
    huskydog Club Member Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2017 #100

    Just so glad I've got a M/Hwink

  • huskydog
    huskydog Club Member Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2017 #101

    How old is this baby ???smile

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2017 #102

    By the end of the discussion he or she should make first grade at school. It's OK affixing it to the towbar before each trip but it's weight is not constant as it grows quickly

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,427 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited November 2017 #103

    that's what lutz appear to be saying? no force being applied  smile

    Actually the baby has at least two forces acting on him/her (his weight and the seat pushing back) 

     

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,427 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited November 2017 #104

    3.4 months

  • huskydog
    huskydog Club Member Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2017 #105

    Cute at that age smile

  • Lutz
    Lutz Forum Participant Posts: 1,564 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November 2017 #106

    Of course the baby is acting on the see saw but to get the see saw level again that weight is not sufficient. The added weight that is needed at the end of the see saw to do so is the noseweight.

    For the car's towbar it is irrelevant how heavy or light the A-frame is or where the gas bottles are located, for example. It only experiences a resultant force due to the distribution of the various loads within the caravan and that is the noseweight.

  • lornalou1
    lornalou1 Forum Participant Posts: 2,169
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2017 #107

    well done everyone, over 100 replies. is this the best ever or what is the best/longest threads.

  • lornalou1
    lornalou1 Forum Participant Posts: 2,169
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2017 #108

    sorry. MPG when towing beats it.

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,142 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited November 2017 #109

    Who could overlook Sunday Departures. Didn’t it reach in excess of 10k posts?

    Youve seen nothing yet, LL. laughing

  • huskydog
    huskydog Club Member Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2017 #110

    As TW says ,this one is just a babysmile

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,427 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited November 2017 #111

    Finally ten out of ten, you got there, noseweight is a resultant force. You have used the correct terminology. The weight on the nose itself does not equal zero but the resultant of all the forces acting on the nose can be.

  • lornalou1
    lornalou1 Forum Participant Posts: 2,169
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2017 #112

    OMG don't mention babies again. 10k replies, somebody could make a film about that.  sealed

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,427 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited November 2017 #113

    ahhhh Sunday departures. Happy days

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2017 #114

    Christ! You need to get out more Corners ..... I'm glad you never taught me maths  ...... you seem to excell at pedantry sealed

  • Lutz
    Lutz Forum Participant Posts: 1,564 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November 2017 #115

    Of course it's the resultant force. It's so obvious that it shouldn't be necessary to even mention the word 'resultant'. Who cares what the A-frame (or the baby) weighs? The towbar certainly doesn't so its not part of the noseweight (or how do you define noseweight?).

  • Heethers
    Heethers Forum Participant Posts: 641
    500 Comments
    edited November 2017 #116

    My 460 VIP 2014 when measured with all equipment comes out at 90kg on a milenco gauge that's with 2 calor lite bottles in front and all the equipment for siting the van in the front locker, all heavy stuff in the car including food. In the van clothes cooking utensils and bedding in the van plus aqua roles and waste master

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,427 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited November 2017 #117

    I don't think you'd be in my school MMwink

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited November 2017 #118

    Good cool

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,427 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited November 2017 #119

    I think you have shot you self in the foot again , the towbar doesn't weight anything? once again really? try dropping it in your other (unshot) foot. Everything weights something on this planet. Try standing on the tow bar and see if it affect noseweight? I think it would, but if you are correct who care what the towbar weights?

    Also we haven't covered the effect of gravity (or g) varying with height? But I expect that is too obvious for you?

    I'll close but I have noticed how engineers always use the obvious word (actually the height of hubris to think what is obvious to you is the same to everyone else)  while mathematicians/physicists use precise language. I suppose we do all the background work for youwink

    I wonder how many engineering accidents have been caused by the use of that word when designing something? You know - who cares what the A frame weights it won't have an effect.

    smile

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,427 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited November 2017 #120

    smile

  • Lutz
    Lutz Forum Participant Posts: 1,564 ✭✭✭✭
    edited November 2017 #121

    Who has said that the towbar or A-frame doesn't weight anything? Of course they do, but what relevance does the weight specifically of individual components have to the discussion? And as for gravity varying with height as long as we aren't talking about towing caravans on the moon or elsewhere in space, what relevance has that in practice, too?

    Your arguments are very theoretical and seem to disconnect with their actual impact in practical real live situations.