Booking problems & Bad site closure planning

2»

Comments

  • Old firefighter
    Old firefighter Forum Participant Posts: 22
    edited May 2017 #32

    No way harry, I went online just prior to my post, & none of the sites I mention showed a full weekend free before the end of June. Surely the online site should be up to date at any given time.   My point is that having so many closures in one area is very bad planning !

  • Old firefighter
    Old firefighter Forum Participant Posts: 22
    edited May 2017 #33

    I'm totally against this, & believe it's a selfish way to conduct membership.  Surely this is part of the problem. Members booking up well in advance, Just in case, & spoiling it for others !

  • Old firefighter
    Old firefighter Forum Participant Posts: 22
    edited May 2017 #34

    We returned from a holiday last week at 2 top quality sites, with all the services club sites offer.  The first was Naburn Lock nr York, & the 2nd Castle Howard nr Malton.  Both £20 a night inc elec, (& half price entry into the stately home & grounds at Castle Howard).

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2017 #35

    Who says it's 'just in case'?

    I have booked about 120 nights. I guess that 90 of them are club sites. Unless there are unforseen circumstances they will be used as indeed they have been for the last 7+ years.

    Most of the dates would not have been a problem say 2 or three months ahead but not knowing what events are on I like to book my touring routes.

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,155 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited May 2017 #36

    Is this a case of it simply not suiting you, Ravenscar? We all have an equal chance of booking and you can do the same as others do so what is selfish about that?

    How dare members book their holidays well in advance. Whatever next!surprised

    Your 'just in case' statement is pure supposition.

     

     

  • Old firefighter
    Old firefighter Forum Participant Posts: 22
    edited May 2017 #37

    harryb, with respect, I'd like to know how you can claim that 'all' of the dales sites show full availability for June.  I've just checked Bolton Abbey for a pitch with awning, & the first full weekend available is shown on the website as the 23rd of September.  All the prior weekends have at least one of the days full.   The other site I've just checked (6pm today) Lower Wensleydale, shows the first available full weekend available as Saturday July 1st.   

  • IanH
    IanH Forum Participant Posts: 4,708
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2017 #38

    Yes, it's true that this does happen - supported by the number of cancellations just outside the 72 hour cut off period seen on 'late availability'. Also, numerous people have said on here that they book speculatively.

    Deposits would solve this - even though they would offer me no advantage, I'm willing to see the reality of this.

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2017 #39

    "Spoiling it for others?" undecided

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2017 #40

     O dear Ian  Yet again posting with no real evidence to support your speculation about the "just outside the 72hr period" as the "late availability" is just a guide of available pitches at the time,as numerous reasons could alter the amount of pitches at any timewink,

    And i have noted one or two on here who state they book speculatively bu its usually followed by a  smileycool 

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2017 #41

    Apparently, according to Ian, 'numerous people have said on here that they book speculatively.'

    Must have missed those. I remember one person saying that in jest. I have amended a couple of bookings (longer on one site, miss a stop out, early at another etc due to car problems in the last 7 years. Also cancelled a booking about 5 days ahead on April 9th last year. Non facility site near Carlisle in order to go earlier to a commercial site to be near friends. Doubt that inconvenienced anybody!

  • moulesy
    moulesy Forum Participant Posts: 9,403 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited May 2017 #42

    But Ian, it's only a couple of weeks ago when you were saying (I think this is pretty much an exact quote) "I've never subscribed to the theory that deposits would make people less likely to cancel" and agreeing that folk who'd paid a deposit were likely to wait until the last possible minute before cancelling, thus making it more difficult for others to take up their pitch!

    When did you change your mind? wink

    As for what "numerous people" have said on here, well, don't believe all you read - fake news is in the headlines at the moment, after all! smile

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,155 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited May 2017 #43

    I must have missed the speculative bookers as well, Easy.

    In the same way it's odd that an ordinary poster can see how many cancellations happen just before the 72 hour deadline when the club doesn't collect such information. 

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2017 #44

    We have not had a 'bring back bookings' thread for a while. Perhaps Ian would like to start one? 

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2017 #45

    Just a thought    IanH has been (according to him) getting his "information?" from a "meeting" and a "senior manager" of the clubsurprisedcool 

  • N1805
    N1805 Forum Participant Posts: 1,092
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2017 #46

    There is an Ian started a thread here - not sure if it is the same Ian - not about booking though.

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2017 #47

    What speculative bookings Ian?? 

  • young thomas
    young thomas Club Member Posts: 11,357 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited May 2017 #48

    the 'naked' truth, perhaps?wink

  • David2115
    David2115 Club Member Posts: 548
    100 Likes 100 Comments Name Dropper
    edited May 2017 #49

    I think you know the answer to your own question, why would you remain a member if majority of sites you use are commercial and cheaper. It's a no brainer for you. 

  • Randomcamper
    Randomcamper Club Member Posts: 1,062 ✭✭
    500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited May 2017 #50

    especially as all the private site fees were substantially lower. I'm afraid this is often the topic of conversation with other campers.

     

    I've stayed on club sites for over 40 years and never ever ever had a conversation with anybody on a site about the fees............

    Often the weather, attractions locally, my van, car, bike etc or who's turn it is to do the washing up......

    Do you instigate the "fees" conversation.......?  I would suggest that if the price is such an issue, you vote with your feet........