Mildenhall site not opening 2017

13567

Comments

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited February 2017 #62

    Nothing personal Ro.

     

    CRAP.

    It was a good no facility site from what I can see

  • Merve
    Merve Forum Participant Posts: 2,333
    1000 Comments
    edited February 2017 #63

    Spot on Easy. Well said. Like I've said many times Easy and others are now saying it- they are not interested in the non EHUers as they can't charge the big bucks for non EHU sites. This is yet another example of the treatment of non EHUers. 

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited February 2017 #65

    As I have posted on another thread,with all the sites closed or have left the network up to now, ,and several others if the "info" from other posts comes to pass then the money saved is maybe what is finaceing the ego trip "re brand?"undecided 

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited February 2017 #66

    who said I wasn't up to standard, certainly not all the members who loved this sites simple but back to nature appeal. Not everyone wants all the bells and whistles, and after all this club needs to meet the requirements of all it members

    Indeed, Not a site that I have used recently, but one tha tI would happily have used.

    Can anybody who has been say what was/is wrong with it?? 

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited February 2017 #67

    We used it two years ago and apart from it being, in places,in need of some tree work to make it less enclosed in some areas, then it was fine,god walks directly out of site, and some aircraft noise from Mildenhall USAF base (being  closed soon) it was a nice  non facility site

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited February 2017 #68

    Sounds a bit like the other recently closed site at Much Wenlock. The difference being that lease renewal was an option here

  • DianneT
    DianneT Forum Participant Posts: 521
    100 Comments
    edited February 2017 #69

    There are two CL's nearer than the ones Rochelle has posted.

    Wildmere Farm CL  at Holywell Row, Mildenhall Suffolk 

    The Suffolk Academy CL at Barrow approx. 15 miles from Mildenhall.

    Reviews and Photo's here including various Sites we have stopped at in the UK

     

    What a shame Round Plantation, Mildenhall Site is no more.  I live just a mile from it but we have spent many happy hours in our caravan there when we had a business in Mildenhall had a seasonal pitch for weekends  That's when there was a Full Time Warden there.  Those were the days a much smaller site than it was of late.  

    During the war the site was a Munitions Dump.had excellent hard standings, .

    DianneT

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,149 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited February 2017 #70

    It was nice there under the trees, Dianne, very natural but a bit noisier than Thetford which is more manicured.

  • peedee
    peedee Club Member Posts: 9,390 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited March 2017 #72

    While it is sad to lose yet another site, Mildenhall did need a lot of work doing to it to bring it up to a reasonable standard and I can well understand the Club not wishing to keep it if tenure could not be guaranteed. It is certainly not a site I would visit again.

    It is ironic members are complaining about the cost of rebranding and are now complaining about the Club being careful not to waste money.

    peedee

  • Oneputt
    Oneputt Club Member Posts: 9,145 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #73

    What is wrong with giving a little publicity to the 2 x CL's actually sited in Mildenhall? 

    Why go to March 23 miles away? If you are a 'birder' and want to visit Lakenheath, Lackford Lakes, Lynford Arboretum etc.. that's a heck of a commute every day.

    My vote would be stay locally to Mildenhall 

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #74

    What work?

    I can't see diversity of sites as a waste of money although this is not a site that I know

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #76

    It is certainly a site that I would have used if I travelled that way Steve. I enjoy non facility sites and not for the saving. When I go to Anglesey occasionally I always use the none facility site rather than the facility site a couple of miles down the road.

  • JayEss
    JayEss Forum Participant Posts: 1,663
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #77

    It's probably something to do with the way the CL search works nowadays. cry

    I agree. If people want to be in a particular location then posting an alternative some distance away seems bizarre when there are alternatives much closer 

    CL owners must wonder why they bother sometimes 

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 13,867 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited March 2017 #78

    We obviously don't know the detailed information on this site. However clearly it does not seem to be owned by the Club and therefore seems to be held on some sort of leasehold basis. If the owners of the site are unwilling to commit to a reasonable length of lease it's hardly surprising that the Club is cautious about investing money which they may never see a return on. The site is almost opposite the Mildenhall RAF base which is due to be closed in 2023 and used for housing, perhaps the same awaits the land used by the campsite which is preventing a long lease. Its an uncomfortable truth that all sites held on a leasehold basis could be at risk sooner or later.

    David

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #80

    If the owners of the site are unwilling to commit to a reasonable length of lease it's hardly surprising that the Club is cautious about investing money which they may never see a return on.

    I wonder what the club saw as needing to be done? 

    Remind me why the club lost Braithwaite Fold? Was it because they wanted to spend money on upgrading the site and the Caravan and Camping Club didn't? I have no idea really but I do wonder.

  • SteveL
    SteveL Club Member Posts: 12,311 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited March 2017 #81

    As you say David, we don't know the detailed information. If for instance it needed 10's of thousands of pounds spending on the EHU provision, that clearly would not make any sense, if the lease only had a few years to run. However, it would not preclude keeping it open as a non EHU site for those few years.

    The club really needs to come clean and give a bit more information. You never know we might be a bit more understanding. Although the fact they waited until after the rebrand and until the show had closed to announce the closure, means they have a fair bit of work required to redeem themselves in my eyes.

  • ABM
    ABM Forum Participant Posts: 14,578
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #82

    Isn't  the  land  owned  by  the  Forestry  Commission ,  it  certainly  had  public  footpaths  thro'  it,  and  I  think ( not  100%  sure )  it  had  Bridle-ways  as  well  ??

    It's  certainly  a  forest  site  --  one  of  the  reasons  why  I  used  it .

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 13,867 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited March 2017 #83

    In the case of Braithwaite Fold didn't the local Council put it up on a short term lease, of I think five years to the highest bidder. Its years since I have been there so no idea if the C&CC have spent money on the site. I can see why the CMC would be reluctant to spend money on a new toilet block costing hundreds of thousands of pounds just for five years. 

    David

  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Posts: 23,149 ✭✭✭
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited March 2017 #84

    We don't know the full story, David, but whatever the truth, it doesn't  excuse the misinformation and omissions regarding nearby sites in the CM's post. That was quite shocking. I'm surprised you haven't defended that as well, to be honest.

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #85

    My recollection David is that the CC's bid was set lower to allow for improvements to the dated toilet block. 

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #86

    Video of Braitwaite Fold. Probably same building but suspect a refit. It is a while since I was there

  • peedee
    peedee Club Member Posts: 9,390 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited March 2017 #87

    It wouldn't suit you ET no hard standings unless you count the foundation of a Ww2 Nissan Hut.  Too many trees, no TV and small difficult to access pitches.

    peedee

  • EasyT
    EasyT Forum Participant Posts: 16,194
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #88

    I don't mind grass on sites that are all grass and have good ground conditions PD. Trees look pleasant enough. No TV is fine by me as well. Although we are away 120 nights we only use TV on 3 nights over Christmas probably no more than 6 hours. This year OH watched Celebrity University Challenge and I think I watched a film. I am sure there was something else? As for pitch Access not a problem with the motormover.

     

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 13,867 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited March 2017 #89

    I don't see what there is to defend or condemn. Members are perfectly able to do their own research and some members have helpfully added details of additional local CL's. Isn't that what the forum should be about, helping each other?

    David

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2017 #90

    Apart from the nissan hut , it sounds like a few sites that those who want "perfection" are around the networks of both clubs,wehen we used Mildenhall the pitches were fine, and we have been on some sites that are a lot worse,and TV? is it that much of a problem,its not what the "new club"seem to be promotingsurprised