The same Club, just better...

1246757

Comments

  • IanH
    IanH Forum Participant Posts: 4,708
    1000 Comments
    edited February 2017 #93

    Maybe people should stop having a go at Rochelle?

    Having experienced 're-brands' in the past, I tend to feel sorry for those who have to explain it all to the masses (most of whom were content with what they had).

    Just witness the presentation at the NEC! I managed a few minutes, before the squirming became too uncomfortable for me.

    These things cost a fortune in payments to advertising whizz-kids (who usually know nothing about the product and just churn out the same sort of stuff that they did for the last client) and new signs, stationary, web-site redesign etc.

    You can't blame the management for having to do their best to try to justify all that expense. 

    In a few months time it will have all died down. We'll still be paying the bill in further increases to membership and site fees, but at least that will give us something else to complain about. wink

  • JCB4X4
    JCB4X4 Forum Participant Posts: 466
    100 Comments
    edited February 2017 #97

    How long before the number of Members owning 'Motor Caravans' overtakes the number of Members owning 'Trailer Caravans' leading to a reason to further 'Rebrand' ?

  • RochelleCC
    RochelleCC Forum Participant Posts: 337
    100 Comments
    edited February 2017 #98

    Thanks BobnLou,

    It's an exciting time for us! We're really looking forward to what lies ahead for the Club smile

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,427 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited February 2017 #99

    I really am in two minds over this.

    In my opinion rebrands are only necessary when a company or organisation needs it. For example I was involved when two schools merged and needed a new identity, or schools rename themselves to create a new reputation. There should be a reason behind the rebrand. I can't think of a reason for the Caravan club to have done this? A new logo perhaps but a totally new name? Were motorhomers feeling left out? Was the club's reputation in need of something? Will the new name attract more people to join, were club sites struggling to get people to stay? Will it be a better club?  So I feel its a total waste of money and resources.

    But on the other hand, what difference will it really make to my stays at club sites, A rose by any other name would smell as sweet

    Club sites will still be the same, booking the same, wardens the same?

  • RochelleCC
    RochelleCC Forum Participant Posts: 337
    100 Comments
    edited February 2017 #100

    Thanks Ian,

    We’re always making improvements to the Club, which means that fees increase by a small amount each year. These exciting changes mean that some routine updates have been brought forward, but the overall cost is proportionate to the significant benefit it will bring to our image and profile.

    Your membership and site fees won't be increasing any more than usual - we've still got a price freeze on 500,000 pitch nights this year!

  • GodivaNige
    GodivaNige Forum Participant Posts: 606
    500 Comments
    edited February 2017 #103

    Indeed :)

    Another observation...

    Matt Allwright, a personality who is well known for making his name from dealing with complaints. Oh the irony :-)

    It transpires the Club committee DOES have a sense of humour wink

  • Navigateur
    Navigateur Club Member Posts: 3,880 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited February 2017 #104

    Lets be fair. The rebranding could be done at minimal cost if clothing, signs, notepaper, etc are updated when new supplies are purchased. The waste is when it is all done at once in the heat of enthusiasm - we shall soon see which method was chosen as we visit sites.

  • RochelleCC
    RochelleCC Forum Participant Posts: 337
    100 Comments
    edited February 2017 #105

    This change is just one part of an on-going update to position the Club for another century of successfully catering to our members’ changing needs.

    The percentage of motorhome owners within the membership has been increasing year on year so we want to be inclusive and representative of our membership.

    As for the logo, you can see more about why we changed it and what it means here: www.camc.com/discover

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 14,427 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited February 2017 #108

    Thanks for the reply Rochelle. As I said at the end of the day provided the 'new' club is run the same way as the old one then:

    A difference which makes no difference is no difference at all 

  • Smersh
    Smersh Forum Participant Posts: 1
    edited February 2017 #112

    Whilst understanding the problems of confidentiality, I feel it unacceptable that HQ could not have included all Centre Officers, i.e. Secretary, Treasurer and Chairmen, in order that at least some views from the heart of Club membership could have been relayed up to our representatives on the Committee.

  • RochelleCC
    RochelleCC Forum Participant Posts: 337
    100 Comments
    edited February 2017 #113

    Hi Smersh,

    The Executive Committee, who represent the needs of our members, were all fully involved in the project from the start.

    The Committee have fully endorsed the changes we’re making. In fact, they were a vital part of this whole process, helping us better understand what our members want.

  • Aspenshaw
    Aspenshaw Forum Participant Posts: 611
    500 Comments
    edited February 2017 #115

    A new branding exercise is long overdue and given the messages that have been coming from the Club for the last few years, it should not be a surprise. Whether people like the branding or not now, time will tell whether it is a success. It is what you do with the brand, not just what it looks like.

    My only comments about the new brand is that it excludes 'tenters' whom the Club has been increasingly targeting, whether willingly or not, and I doubt it has been inclusive of motorhomers since 1907.

    I wish you well and hope it's a success.

  • huskydog
    huskydog Club Member Posts: 5,460 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited February 2017 #117

    the one thing it has done ,it has got some new names posting, hopefully they will continue post cool 

  • JayEss
    JayEss Forum Participant Posts: 1,663
    1000 Comments
    edited February 2017 #118

    Just back from a journey of investment  wink

    I'm not really bothered about the name or the logo or what colour shorts wardens wear. 

    I just hope that now the work leading up to this announcement has finished everyone at Head Office can get on and deliver the improvements they are intending to deliver (without really saying what they are) and sort out the problems that exist currently as a priority. 

    Please can the club address the current problems for CL owners and users urgently?

  • RochelleCC
    RochelleCC Forum Participant Posts: 337
    100 Comments
    edited February 2017 #119

    The essence of the Club is to help you get more from the great outdoors. To achieve this we provide various products and services, many of which generate revenue. We invest this back into the Club so you get the best experience possible. The Club is indeed run in a business-like way to make sure we use your money most efficiently.

    Yet, with no shareholder dividends to pay and no debts to service
    our only purpose is to get the best value for your money and help you get the most from the great outdoors.

  • EJB986
    EJB986 Forum Participant Posts: 1,153
    1000 Comments
    edited February 2017 #120

    Love the new name....about time toowink

    Did expect a new forum instead of this old unreadable and incredibly amateur effortsurprised

    Perhaps 'The Snagging List' thread has finally been Deleted User, instead of simply being ignored, as not appropriate for such a forward looking organisation?