Manual or Automatic

2»

Comments

  • commeyras
    commeyras Club Member Posts: 1,853 ✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #32

    On my Tiguan with DSG I use the electric handbrake or 'auto hold' function for hill starts (they both disconnect as you start off).  'Just stop or go' with auto - not sure I would describe it like that!!!

  • IanBHawkes
    IanBHawkes Forum Participant Posts: 212
    100 Comments
    edited January 2016 #33

    Automatics are wonderful when in normal driving, but if, for example you have to reverse into a tight entrance a manual can be controlled using the clutch and throttle. But, an automatic cannot be control in the same way, it is either stop or go!

    Mmmmm? Innocent ...... that's getting into the which is best? Auto or manual debate. I manage very well reversing my caravan down the side
    of my house with about 10" either side even with a go pedal & a stop pedal. If you can't do the same, you either don't drive drive auto's very often or are doing it wrong. I have complete control

    You see MM I am not talking about reversing a caravan down the side of a building with 10" each side, but a garage that has to be reversed into at an angle and have to take a number of goes to get the car straight to be able to get in. As for not having
    experience! I have been driving for 49 years and my last job was driving 60 foot bendy buses and double deckers with auto boxes, so I do know what I am talking about.

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #34

    You see MM I am not talking about reversing a caravan down the side of a building with 10" each side, but a garage that has to be reversed into at an angle and have to take a number of goes to get the car straight to be able to get in. As for not having
    experience! I have been driving for 49 years and my last job was driving 60 foot bendy buses and double deckers with auto boxes, so I do know what I am talking about.

    An auto is every bit, if not more controlable than a manual .... as comeyras says, theres more to an auto than stop or go.

    & Where did I say you've no experience? Undecided

  • volvoman9
    volvoman9 Forum Participant Posts: 1,053
    500 Comments
    edited January 2016 #35

    Ian auto,s are no different than manuals when it comes too reversing and i would have though an ex professional driver would have no problem with either.I,m no professional driver but i can use either just aswell.The type of tranmission should make no difference at all nomatter where your trying too back in.As regards MM there was no mention of inexperience as far as i can see.

    peter.

  • ADP1963
    ADP1963 Forum Participant Posts: 1,280
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #36

    Automatics are wonderful when in normal driving, but if, for example you have to reverse into a tight entrance a manual can be controlled using the clutch and throttle. But, an automatic cannot be control in the same way, it is either stop or go!

    Write your comments here... I don't agree with that. Having towed with both and been driving like you a very long time 57 years in fact, I find my present vehicle Lexus RX 350 the most simplest of all the vehicles I have driven and that is from Fords to
    Jags .Reversing is as easy as it gets and up  Mollys standard.

  • PATMAU
    PATMAU Forum Participant Posts: 250
    edited January 2016 #37

    Autpmatic for us, and have done for nearly 30 years.  Wouldn't go back to a manual at all.  All have been good towcars, Volvo, Ford, Vauxhall (except for the Omega, but that's another story) and our present is a Zafira which surprisingly is a good tug. 

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #38

     ... Vauxhall (except for the Omega, but that's another story) and  .... 

    I'm sat comfortably ...... apart from an initial hic-cup my 3.0 Omega wasn't a bad car, certainly a good towcar .... a bit of a thisty bugger when towing though)

  • PATMAU
    PATMAU Forum Participant Posts: 250
    edited January 2016 #39

     ... Vauxhall (except for the Omega, but that's another story) and  .... 

    I'm sat comfortably ...... apart from an initial hic-cup my 3.0 Omega wasn't a bad car, certainly a good towcar .... a bit of a thisty bugger when towing though)

    Our Omega was a good towcar, it was a 2.2 and top of the range, and that was the problem.  It had so much gadgetry on it,  the computerised system on it kept going wrong and we had to have that changed twice not counting the sensors it kept blowing.  Fortunately most of the work was under warranty but then it started costing us money and when a technician from Vauxhall HQ tells you to get rid of it, that's what we did.

    Plus it was such a Diva anyway, I swear it had a mind of its own, and  thought it was beneath it to pull a van.  It had a very reproachful look if we went on a rally field as if to say "do you really expect me to drive across this mud", lol.

    We traded it in for a very basic Zafira, it even has wind down rear windows because I was so fed up with all the electronic stuff going wrong on the Omega.  We still have it and it has been a good car.  No major problems, just wear and tear and tows really well.  Just had a recall check for fire risk and passed that OK. 

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #40

     ....

    Our Omega was a good towcar, it was a 2.2 and top of the range, and that was the problem.   ....

    Ah! A Desmond (Desmond Tutu ... 2.2 Innocent) Mine was a top of the range Elite too .... never had a problem with any of its gadgetry,
    just a couple of crank sensors & a coil pack in 10 yrs & 90 000 miles ... but it had a full compliment of cylinders Wink

  • Heethers
    Heethers Forum Participant Posts: 641
    500 Comments
    edited January 2016 #41

    lam in the process of changing my Shogun for an outlander, had 3 Shoguns the latter being an auto, so much more relaxing than the manuels. So pretty much sure l will choose the auto outlander but will have to spend another 1500 to 2000 against the manuel
    plus 50 quid more road tax

  • Kennine
    Kennine Forum Participant Posts: 3,472
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #42

    Autos excel in heavy stop start city driving.  I have had autos and manuals as company cars.  IMO on the open road, driving solo , it doesnt matter which you choose. 

    For towing, I prefer a manual. 

    K

  • crown green bowler
    crown green bowler Forum Participant Posts: 407
    100 Comments
    edited January 2016 #43

    We have towed with a shogun auto for the last ten years, which we like very much, and had a shogun manual before that which towed well, but with an auto you can never be in the wrong gear. We have just changed our honda jazz for an auto jazz, which is just
    a great little car.Smile