Mercedes C220D

BBsGeo77
BBsGeo77 Forum Participant Posts: 3
edited December 2015 in Towcars & Towing #1

I am considering ordering a Mercedes C220D Estate to tow a Swift Charisma 540.  I am weighing up either the SE or Sport model.  I am aware that the Sport sits 15mm lower to the ground.  Does anyone have any experience with either SE or Sport model ? Do you
know the tow ball distance from the ground ? Thanks......

Comments

  • engineman1947
    engineman1947 Forum Participant Posts: 7
    edited December 2015 #2
    In reply to your post . my car is a B class sport, so this may not be relevant. I bought the car not realising at fhe time I would be towing a caravan. Although the car tows fine ,had I known I would not have bought the sport model. 9a0it does sit quite
    low but not excessively so and (b) the low profile tyres give out a little more road noise than I would have liked particularly on less than smooth surfaces . Again this my be irrelevant for the C class but may help in your decision. Alan
  • BBsGeo77
    BBsGeo77 Forum Participant Posts: 3
    edited December 2015 #3

    thanks for feedback Engineman1947........ the tyres on the C Class have 50mm walls.... I am thinking this is not too low profile...  how does this compare ?

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2015 #4

    thanks for feedback Engineman1947........ the tyres on the C Class have 50mm walls.... I am thinking this is not too low profile...  how does this compare ?

    50mm or 50% Innocent

  • BBsGeo77
    BBsGeo77 Forum Participant Posts: 3
    edited December 2015 #5

    The tyre size is 225/50 which I understood to mean a 50mm tye wall.

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2015 #6

    The tyre size is 225/50 which I understood to mean a 50mm tye wall.

    225 is the width of the tyre in mm

    50 is 50% of the tyre width Wink

  • Lutz
    Lutz Forum Participant Posts: 1,564 ✭✭✭✭
    edited December 2015 #7

    The tyre aspect ratio (the 50%) doesn't allow you to draw any conclusions abot the ride height. Normally a numerically low aspect ratio is compensated by larger diameter wheels, so that the overall diameter of the wheel is more or less the same.

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2015 #8

    The tyre aspect ratio (the 50%) doesn't allow you to draw any conclusions abot the ride height.  ...

    Nobody said it did Wink Enginman mention aspect ratio in relation to road noise & ride

  • cyberyacht
    cyberyacht Forum Participant Posts: 10,218
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2015 #9

    My brother has a C Class with the AMG Sport pack. The ride shakes the fillings out of your teeth.

  • Runrig
    Runrig Forum Participant Posts: 186
    edited December 2015 #10

    I tow with a C220 CDi AMG Sport Estate.

    The Sport does sit lower on it's suspension but the correct tow bar should sit the ball at the appropriate height. Semi-laden mine sits at 420mm to centre, which is in the band.

    It tows a relatively light Avante 475 like it's not there, and never had a single nervous moment. But from March will tow a new 7m long Xplore at 1350kg (an 81% match).
    It won't have an issue power wise, but hoping it remains as stable at the limit.

    There are reviews that say it isn't the most stable of platforms in its class, but that the stiffer suspension on the Sport gives better stability than the more compliant SE suspension. Like I said, I have never had a single nervous moment. We will see.

    Fully laden the rear suspension does compress somewhat, giving the caravan a pronounced nose down stance, and renders the already jiggly ride a little hard, but not uncomfortabley so.

    Only car I have ever replaced with another, like for like, and providing it tows the bigger van okay, wouldn't hesitate to have another. Not had a single issue on either, in eight years and over 150k miles.
    Just make sure you put winter tyres on if you want to go anywhere on snow.

  • Runrig
    Runrig Forum Participant Posts: 186
    edited December 2015 #11

    My C220 Sport Estate sits on 225 front and 245/40/18's at the rear.

    Looks brilliant and goes like stink.

    Definately wouldn't suit the 4x4 beard brigade
    "ooh that won't get you off a muddy field in the highlands"

    No? ... I would give up caravaning first  Wink 

  • kentman
    kentman Forum Participant Posts: 147
    edited December 2015 #12

    Can't speak for C class but I had two E class cars and towbar grounding was a problem with both. Swapped for a 4x4 partly because of this (but have not grown a beard yet)

  • Tigi
    Tigi Forum Participant Posts: 1,038
    500 Comments
    edited December 2015 #13

    One tip if you are ordering a new Merc and are concerned about aspects of a puncture check tyre type / spare / repair kit as they seem to be going down the run flat route on some models. 

  • jlseagull
    jlseagull Forum Participant Posts: 39
    First Comment
    edited December 2015 #14

    I have a C220 Sport Estate matched to a Sterling Elite Diamond (1460 kg).   We use it mainly for towing including long extended holidays on the Continent.    Absolutely no problems at all.     The suspension is firm but self-levelling and the van rides dead
    level at all loadings.   One tip, inflate the car tyres to full load for best stability.  Sport mode is not necessary when towing and we find the ride is better in standard trim.   It usually does about 27 to 28 mpg and we are entirely happy with it..    My
    son has a Volvo XC90 and a Porsche Targa and he reckons our Merc suspension is far superior to  to either.   The Volvo is wallowy and the Porsche is like riding on cobbles.   Give me the Merc any day.

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2015 #15

     ....   The Volvo is wallowy and the Porsche is like riding on cobbles.   Give me the Merc any day.

    My Merc's Airmatic will give you either Wink

  • flatcoat
    flatcoat Forum Participant Posts: 1,571
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2015 #16

    If you can get air suspension I would strongly advise to go for it, otherwise go for the sport if the spec and kit meets your needs. Other must have options on a Merc (to help when it comes to trade-in time) are heated leather (avoid the standard cloth)
    , a good metallic colour and autobox. Sat nav always helps as does a decent sound system upgrade, HID headlights and factory tow bar kit. Enjoy!

  • Runrig
    Runrig Forum Participant Posts: 186
    edited December 2015 #17

    You beat me to it flatcoat.

    If you are ordering new, then the airmaticsuspension and factory tow ball are a must. You will then be able to firm up the suspension whatever the trim and self level.

    Mine current one is a 2012 W204 Sport, so no self level, and the driving mode only changes the engine/gearbox map, makes no difference to steering or suspension.

    The half cloth/Artico isn't that bad IMO, but yes good metalic and autobox essential. And my HID lights are stunning.

    Considering a new one just for the airmatic.

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2015 #18

     .... Considering a new one just for the airmatic.

    It's great when the caravan is on the back of my car ...... always level. Not struck on the 'sport' setting though as you can feel every crisp packet on the road and makes the ride a bit jittery.

  • flatcoat
    flatcoat Forum Participant Posts: 1,571
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2015 #19

    Runrig, my comments are more about how the market will value a Merc with/without leather at trade-in time! The air suspension on my Audi does not so much firm up the ride as lower the ride height when in sport mode. It has the advantage of being able to
    adjust the ride height within a range of 35mm which can be handy when traversing or hooking upto the van on undulating ground.

  • EmilysDad
    EmilysDad Forum Participant Posts: 8,973
    1000 Comments
    edited December 2015 #20

     .... The air suspension on my Audi does not so much firm up the ride as lower the ride height when in sport mode. It has the advantage of being able to adjust the ride height within a range of 35mm which can be handy when traversing or hooking upto the
    van on undulating ground.

    My Airmatic has the option of lifting the car about 4" for added ground clearance at speeds up to 20mph .... in theory for off roading Innocent ...
    but adding the caravan disables it. In normal use Airmatic has soft/medium/sport settings and apparently it lowers at motorways speeds though I've never noticed that. 

  • Chris Ardis
    Chris Ardis Forum Participant Posts: 55
    edited January 2016 #21

    My 2010 C220 Cdi estate in Elegance trim tows a  1,350 Kg van very well. I fitted a Thule detachable tow bar with noseweight of 100kg. The Merc retractable bar only alowed 75 kg which is frankly too low for my needs and was very expensive in comparison.

    I would check the specification of both SE & Sport models & choose whichever suits you best. Either will make a good towcar. Incidentally, I use All Season tyres on the rear axle that provide better traction and a much better wear rate than the standard fit tyres.

  • Runrig
    Runrig Forum Participant Posts: 186
    edited January 2016 #22

    Chris, you might want to check your handbook, and more importantly your Mercedes certificate of conformity. I think you will find the technical perrmisable load on the coupling point applies to the vehicle, and is catagorically 75kg for my 2012 C220 Estate.

    This is irrespective of what coupling it has fitted.

    I too have the Thule detachable coupling, but it's 100kg rating applies to that common coupling component which could be fitted to a whole host of vehicles. i.e good for 100kg if the vehicle is rated sufficiently.


    Regrettably I think you will find our C220's are not.

    75kg as a ratio of 1350 kg is 5.6%

     

  • Chris Ardis
    Chris Ardis Forum Participant Posts: 55
    edited January 2016 #23

    My Lunar 554 does not stand a hope in hell of getting down to a 75 Kg nose weight. I will stick by the weight rating on the actual towbar as being compliant rather than the weight shown in the manual for a differant bar with a lower rating.

  • Runrig
    Runrig Forum Participant Posts: 186
    edited January 2016 #24

    Surprised  Cool

    But you might want to read this document from the club. Particularly the first paragraph on the second page which hopefully better explains, where I clearly failed.

    http://www.caravanclub.co.uk/media/6678669/noseweights-mo.pdf

    Then see the table on page 12 confirming the max noseweight for our C Class is 75kg. This is the vehicle maximum, irrespective of what is bolted to it. And as the text confirms, you are limited by whichever figure is lowest, not pick the figure that suits us best.

    I wish it wasn't so, I find it a struggle too.

    Best of luck

     

  • Vulcan
    Vulcan Forum Participant Posts: 670
    edited January 2016 #25

    My Lunar 554 does not stand a hope in hell of getting down to a 75 Kg nose weight. I will stick by the weight rating on the actual towbar as being compliant rather than the weight shown in the manual for a differant bar with a lower rating.

    The vehicle manufacturers noseweight limit should not be exceeded under any circumstances, it could lead to several problems as well voiding your insurance in the event of an accident.

  • flatcoat
    flatcoat Forum Participant Posts: 1,571
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #26

    This is one specific reason why i would never buy a C class, the nose weight limit is simply too low for many outfits. The lack of understanding of the implications of interpretation of nose weight limits set by car manufacturers is also worrying.......
    However I do concur with the all weather or winter tyre set up albeit all 4 tyres should match and not just be fitted to the driven wheels (although i know of others who do that too).

  • Unknown
    Unknown Forum Participant
    edited January 2016 #27
    The user and all related content has been Deleted User
  • Chris Ardis
    Chris Ardis Forum Participant Posts: 55
    edited January 2016 #28

    With regard to fitting All Season tyres to the rear axle only. The regulations state that all tyres be of the same type. That is regarding construction, ie. radial or cross ply. There is no restriction on tread design either across the axle or between front
    and rear axles.

    All Season M&S tyres are designed to provide better grip on wet, muddy and moderately snow covered surfaces throughout the year and as such I think they are the ideal solution for rear wheel drive towcars with limited weight on the driven wheels. You will
    find most articulated trucks run with specifically designed steer, drive and trailer tyres fitted to their respective axles. Cars can be treated in exactly the same manner. My outfit comprises Michelin Primacy HD (front), Pirelli 4 Season M&S (rear) & GT Radial
    'trailer use only' tyres on the caravan. All perfectly legal. 

  • flatcoat
    flatcoat Forum Participant Posts: 1,571
    1000 Comments
    edited January 2016 #29

    I accept your knowledge regarding the legal situation and I didn't suggest the whole outfit has to have the same tyres! However if you were to venture into parts of Europe in winter(such as germany) you would by law, need all 4 wheels on the car to have
    winter tyres. It is also about suitablity for the lower temperatures and my understanding from extensive research is summer tryres are not designed to operate at their best at temperatures below 7C. I personally think it is a risk you are taking and given
    they are all that glues your car to the road would not be wiling to take such a risk. I use latest generation winter graded all-season tyres to save the seasonal swap.

  • Runrig
    Runrig Forum Participant Posts: 186
    edited January 2016 #30

    I have no doubt you are completely legal in the UK, and the differential between your good all round summer fronts and all-season rears is extremely unlikely to throw up anything untoward.

    I run winter tyres on all our cars (except my track toy)
    Here is what works for me.

    On our front wheel drive cars I am happy just putting winters on the fronts. After all, the fronts are doing all the traction, all the steering, and almost all the braking.
    ( Don’t tell SWMBO, but on snow, her Focus encourages me to drive everywhere like Ari Vatenen )

    However, on the Mercedes (or any RWD car) the thought of having winter tyres just on the rears for traction is completely anathema.
    Imagine having the “traction” on an icy snowy road only to find you can’t steer and brake with equal confidence, when you need to.  No, not for me I am afraid.
    Winter tyres all round, and on snow, the Merc is transformed from a complete basket case, to a confidently capable, go anywhere animal (until ground clearance becomes the limiting factor)

    I have looked at the new crop of all-season options, but for the sake of a couple of hours hassle each November and March will stick to having the best of both worlds, on the Mercedes at least. 
    I have a mate in the tyre business and he is trying the Michelin Cross Climate, so will await his verdict. They might be a reasonable all season compromise for the FWD cars.

    Bring on some snow Laughing

  • Chris Ardis
    Chris Ardis Forum Participant Posts: 55
    edited January 2016 #31

    I am lucky enough to live in an area on the west coast with its own winter micro climate and rarely have to deal with snow. One inch constitutes a blizard here. Any more and the town comes to a standstill. I do not intend to travel to the continent in winter.

    I use All Season tyres simply to provide traction on CL's and grass pitches on main sites where the original Michelin Energy tyres gave up. The bonus is that the original rear tyres wore out at 14,700 miles (1st owners driving style unknown) while All
    Season Goodyear Eagle Vector 2 tyres did over 22,600 miles in my stewardship.