End of the triple lock?

2»

Comments

  • KjellNN
    KjellNN Club Member Posts: 8,670 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited August 2016 #32

    Kj, I don't think I said the 2.5% was on top of anything, I said it was the third "part" of the triple lock which would guarantee the minimum if needed. 

    Sorry brue, It was this bit that I thought you meant that by....

    "The 2.5% guarantee (on top of inflation/cost of living)"

     

     

  • sweepy
    sweepy Forum Participant Posts: 5
    edited August 2016 #33

    We should remmeber that when govenrments speak about pension costs such as 90 billion or whatever the figure is they do not refer to the state pension but to all pensions paid by government that is teachers, mp's judges civil servants, soldiers and so on.
    I have never heard the true cost of the state pension given.

  • Snowy1
    Snowy1 Forum Participant Posts: 263
    edited August 2016 #34

    For those that will be on the new state pension, will the triple-lock apply to the whole pension amount?

    That's a very good question.

    As the new state pension is, in effect, the new basic pension, then yes you would expect the triple lock to apply to all of it.

    But a large percentage of people won't qualify for the full amount of the new state pension, due to the rules about contracted out / contracted in NI contributions.

    If the amount that you would have got under the old rules (including additional state pension / SERPS etc) is more than you would get under the new state pension, you will get the higher amount.

    But how much then is subject to the triple lock?

    Hmm......I need to do some more research.......

    I have try'ed to find out but not been able to confirm one way or the other, but I'm lucky as I've my army pension to top up my standard of living. Got to work till 66 now, 8 to go, feel it's going to go slow, yes I'm 58! Don't think we qualified for SERPS
    in the army. So I don't think any SERPS will be added to my so called foundation amount if you know what I mean.

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2016 #35

    We should remmeber that when govenrments speak about pension costs such as 90 billion or whatever the figure is they do not refer to the state pension but to all pensions paid by government that is teachers, mp's judges civil servants, soldiers and so on.
    I have never heard the true cost of the state pension given.

    Write your comments here...And all the MPs

  • brue
    brue Forum Participant Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2016 #36

    Kj, I don't think I said the 2.5% was on top of anything, I said it was the third "part" of the triple lock which would guarantee the minimum if needed. 

    Sorry brue, It was this bit that I thought you meant that by....

    "The 2.5% guarantee (on top of inflation/cost of living)"

     

     

    Write your comments here...My terminology is at fault, culpa mea, not sure how I should have expressed the situation of the the three locks but I certainly didn't mean this to appear as an added extra! I did my best I hope to explain the three parts. By the way all the info is out there on gov uk, pensions advisory services, Paul Lewis, Martin Lewis et al.

  • brue
    brue Forum Participant Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2016 #37

    I will now step down from the witness box and leave others to the cross examination procedure....Worried

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 13,860 ✭✭✭
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited August 2016 #38

    If it's any help I've just checked the info about extra bits of pensions like SERPS and these are only linked to the Consumer Price Index so no increases this year.

    Ah, that would explain things, thanks Brue.

    David

  • brue
    brue Forum Participant Posts: 21,176 ✭✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2016 #39

    Apologies for getting the mea culpa round the wrong way too...not a good ending...Wink

  • Fisherman
    Fisherman Forum Participant Posts: 2,367
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2016 #40

    Dont understand why State ensions should be lumped in with benefits.To get a full state pension you will have had to pay in both taxes and National Insurance. Not therefore a benefit.

  • IanH
    IanH Forum Participant Posts: 4,708
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2016 #41

    There are several benefits that are dependant upon NI contributions.

    The state retirement pension is a non means tested benefit.

  • KjellNN
    KjellNN Club Member Posts: 8,670 ✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper
    edited August 2016 #42

    I think most of us prefer to look at our pension as something we have contributed to for many years and have therefore "earned"

    (I do know there is no separate state pension fund)

    The fact it is based on how long you have contributed strengthens this feeling.

  • IanH
    IanH Forum Participant Posts: 4,708
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2016 #43

    Contribution based Jobseekers Allowance

    Contribution based Employment & Support Allowance

    Incapacity Benefit

    Bereavement Benefits

    Statutory Sick Pay

    Statutory Maternity Pay

    All these (off the top of my head) are benefits that we have 'paid for' in the form of NI contributions. You only get them if you have contributed for a specified period for each.

  • cyberyacht
    cyberyacht Forum Participant Posts: 10,218
    1000 Comments
    edited August 2016 #44

    I thought a triple lock was only needed for a twin axle. Two wheels and the hitch.