Driving licence 3.5t limit - gov't petition for increase of cat B to 4.2t - Bump

peedee
peedee Forum Participant Trusted Posts: 10,113
2,500 Likes 1000 Comments Photogenic Name Dropper

>This petition< requires less that 400 signatures to hit 10,000, the level at which th Government is oblige to comment on. If you support this viewpoint then please sign so we can hear what the Government has to say. The original post has unfortunately got buried and won't come to the top.

peedee

Comments

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 14,787
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic

    A bit late in the day but I have signed even though I never be able to take advantage of this sensible suggestion.

    David

  • eurortraveller
    eurortraveller Club Member Posts: 7,285
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper

    My objection remains. I see no reason why motorhome drivers should have preferential treatment over and above drivers of other larger vehicles.

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 14,787
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic

    ET

    But are drivers of other vehicles asking for the same increase, I've not seen anything? All that is really being asked is that motorhomes are able to combine the max vehicle weight with what they are allowed to tow on a standard licence. I think I would take some convicing that a motorhome with a max weight of 4250kgs is more dangerous than a 3500kgs motorhome towing a trailer weighing up to 750kgs? If other groups of motorists feel that vehicle weights need to be improved then it is up to them to campaign for that. That shouldn'd distract from this petition?

    David

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 15,507
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited February 22 #5

    @DavidKlyne

    I think I would take some convicing that a motorhome with a max weight of 4250kgs is more dangerous than a 3500kgs motorhome towing a trailer weighing up to 750kgs?

    Of course not, a motorhome isn't dangerous in itself but you're missing out one very important factor - the human interface, also known as the driver.

    As I posted upthread somewhere, at the moment a brand new driver, (perhaps 17 years old yes unlikely but possible), having passed their test today at any age with hardly any driving experience is limited to 3500 Kgs, now under this very silly, or not well thought out, perhaps selfish, petition (in my view of course ) can tomorrow, or even the same day of their test buy and drive up to 4250 Kgs. Does that sound sensible? And of course it's not just about weight, weight in a motorhome will probably be linked to length and number of passengers or beds. I've just done some rough googling. A 3500 Kgs motor is around 5 to 7m while over 4250 Kgs can be over 8m. That might be fine if you have worked your way up from one to another but not straight away like this petition would allow?

    The petition almost certainly won't get to 100,000 where this petition will be considered for debate in Parliament, and even it if did it will considered for less than five minutes, if that, I would think, and while it has a good chance of getting to 10,000 the response I would guess will be along the lines that the government has just given its answers on the latest changes published 7th January 2026 and no changes to the licenses weight like this are planned in it.

    By the way 10,000 signatures is under 4% of all motorhomes/campervans in the UK. Make of that what you will as to how representative or supported it is by all those that have motorhomes.

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 14,787
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic

    @Cornersteady Would your theory of driver capability not equally apply to a 50 year old driver who has not driven anything larger than a Kia Picanto but perfectly leagally purchased a large motorhome even if it was 3500kgs? The difference between a 3500kgs and 4250kgs would probably go unnoticed. If a youngster who had recently passed their test I suspect would be more inclined towards a fast sports car, a motorhome probably unlikey? But of the two statistically we know which has more accidents? Also don't forget that not every kilo of payload needs to be used so the total weight could be anywhere between 3500 and 4250 kilos. I think you have mentioned that in the past you have driven mini buses? I don't know if the number of passengers varied but if they did, did you notice the difference? The only difference I noticed when I used to take my motorhome in for its annual service, which had been emptied of contents and nothing in the water tanks was that it bounced around a bit more on uneven roads. It always felt firmer to drive when fully loaded.

    David

  • peedee
    peedee Forum Participant Trusted Posts: 10,113
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments Photogenic Name Dropper

    @Cornersteady Re the younger driver, the Government is currently consulting on what restrictions to impose on new drivers in the first few years (probably the first two) e.g. weight restrictions and number of passengers they will be allowed to carry. In the not too distant future I do not see a scenario like you describe happening even for new older drivers, especially if the B licence is increased to 4.25 tons for all types of vehicle.

    Any increase in motorhome weights, is not always because of size, but in providing better build quality and payloads, both resulting in improved safety and with a less likelihood of being overloaded.

    peedee

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 15,507
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited February 22 #8

     "the younger driver…"

    I Think you've not read my post carefully enough there @peedee I said it's unlikely that about a younger driver but talked more about experience.

    While weight and length is "not always" linked you will find the correlation coefficient is very strong indeed, last time I calculated it it was 0.88 or 88%

    However it's all academic as there are no changes planned to weighs for B licenses. The petition won't get anywhere beyond a response near to the I suggest above and it's not at all supported by MH users I would say?

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 15,507
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic

    David you may have missed my point that it is not about weight itself but length and number of beds or passengers. Weight may be one thing but driving an 8+ m MH is totally different matter to driving a 6m one?

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 14,787
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic

    @Cornersteady The whole point about this petition is really about providing motorhomes with decent payload, not necessarily making motorhomes bigger. My first motorhome was 7.5 metres long with a payload of 550kgs. Depending of your style of touring, ours was long distance continetal travelling in the main, it is a struggle to keep to that payload especially if going on a longer holiday and I would suggest almost impossible if you have a couple of kids. Now it was perfectly possible for me to have up rated the maximum weight which I understand is a fairly simple procedure but as I had relinquished my full driving licence at 70 I couldn't have done that. You can have, what seems like a large motorhome that weighs in at or under 3500kgs so I am not convinced that actual demensions make much difference? My second motorhome was about a metre shorter and had a useful payload of 750kgs but nowhere near as comfortable as the first one.

    David

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 15,507
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited February 22 #11

    @DavidKlyne I would disagree as to the point of the petition. It clearly states on the gov website the aims of the petition that it is to:

    Allow license holders to drive motorhomes up to 4250kg on UK Category B License

    We want the UK to allow UK license holders to drive motorhomes up to 4250kg on UK Category B Licenses, in line with proposed changes from the EU.

    That is an automatic increase from 3500 Kg to 4250Kg for those with a cat B license and there is nothing there to with making motorhomes bigger. I'm not sure where that came from really. It appears to be more wanting parity with the EU?

    If someone needs more payload for whatever reason, children, whatever… then on the other thread it was clearly stated that wasn't really a problem or as you state, do it that way rather than, in my view, risk safety. This safety aspect can be discussed here but at the end of the day the government has decided that there are no plans to change the current weight limits on B licenses and so it's a moot point, also it would appear that it doesn't even have the support the vast majority of the owners of MH/campervans?

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 14,787
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic

    @Cornersteady I am all for rules being based on evidence although that is not always the case sadly. I suspect what most motorhomers want is some flexibility which would enable the to buy the right vehicle for them. I am not sure I have seen any of these petitions actually change things. Maybe its a question of numbers and so far the number of signitures are hardly encouraging. As I have said that even if this change came about it would be of no advantage to me personally but I do understand why it would be a useful change.

    David

  • peedee
    peedee Forum Participant Trusted Posts: 10,113
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments Photogenic Name Dropper

    This safety aspect can be discussed here but at the end of the day the government has decided that there are no plans to change the current weight limits on B licenses

    But the Government has already approved the increase on the B licence to 4.25 tons for electric vehicles. In doing so, it has recognised there is not a safety issue or any need for further training for a B licence holder. There is therefore no impediment as to why this cannot be extended to cover ICE vehicles. The rest of Europe has already agreed to this and it is difficult to imagine the UK will not follow suit.

    peedee

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 15,507
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited February 23 #14

    @peedee

    No. The increase was done to allow trade vehicles and for example delivery van like those used in Amazon and Dpd to use electric vehicles. Electric vehicles would be better suited for these stop start shorter journey times and 'greener' as I'm sure you will understand.

    However these electric vans would use heavy electric batteries and these would eat into the payload of these vans whether used by trade and for delivery. To offset these heavier weights the increase was approved. I did explain this in the other thread, perhaps you missed it?

    So really there was no explicit recognition as to safety as you speculate. In fact I could say as the government has NOT done the same for ICE vehicles and MHs perhaps they do see safety concerns? I am speculating but if you can so can I?

    And why? Well as I see it, and I have a vast Dpd depot with a mile of my home opposite an Aldi where we shop and I notice the electric vans. The change was made I think because the vans are still the same length just heavier because of the electric batteries, while MHs tend to use heavier payloads from 3500 to 4200 Kgs to be longer, and that is a mathematically proven 'fact', and I can prove it again if you wish as well as being easily roughly proven by a simple google search as I did upthread.

    There are to me safety concerns in giving an inexperienced driver an 8+ m MH. If this petition said have an upgrade after 5 years of owning/driving a 3500 Kg MH then maybe but not straight away.

    As I said:

    This safety aspect can be discussed here but at the end of the day the government has decided that there are no plans to change the current weight limits on B licenses

  • peedee
    peedee Forum Participant Trusted Posts: 10,113
    2,500 Likes 1000 Comments Photogenic Name Dropper

    No. The increase was done to allow trade vehicles and for example delivery van like those used in Amazon and Dpd to use electric vehicles. Electric vehicles would be better suited for these stop start shorter journey times and 'greener' as I'm sure you will understand.

    The Fact is the Government are allowing 4.25ton to be driven on a B licence, that is inescapable what ever their reasoning and there is absolutely no reason whatsoever it can not apply to ICE vehicles.

    peedee

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 15,507
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited February 23 #16

    No reason according to you @peedee but not according to the government or they would have done it? I assume they see safety or other concerns or, quite simply, they would have taken your approach and would have done it?

    what ever their reasoning

    The reasons why the government allowed electric vans to be driven up to 4250Kg is pretty clear if you read this:

    Zero emmsions vans.regulatory flebibility

    And do a simple google search:

    Why the 4.25-Tonne Limit Was Approved

    The primary reason for increasing the weight limit from 3.5 tonnes to 4.25 tonnes is to account for the additional weight of batteries in electric vehicles

    image-0be86338b41ed8-e1c7.png

    GOV.UK

    • Payload Parity: Electric vans are heavier than their diesel counterparts. Without this change, the heavy battery would reduce the available payload capacity, making electric vans less practical for businesses.
    • Encouraging ZEV Uptake: The government aims to support the transition to Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEVs) by removing the need for drivers to acquire a more expensive, specialized HGV (C or C1) licence.
  • Tinwheeler
    Tinwheeler Forum Participant Trusted Posts: 24,321
    10,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper

    • Payload Parity: Electric vans are heavier than their diesel counterparts. Without this change, the heavy battery would reduce the available payload capacity, making electric vans less practical for businesses.

    That makes sense as, if vans had to reduce their carrying capacity, the price of carriage and thus the goods carried would increase. That would eventually reflect in inflation which the Govt does not want.

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 14,787
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic

    @Cornersteady from the quote above detailing why the Government has changed the rules. Now whilst I can see that as a pragmatic decision, nowhere can I see any concerns about safety which is something that seems to be one of your concerns? I have to take it as an assumption on my part that the Government did review that but dismissed it as a concern? Alternatively they may have considered it but decided that it wasn't a sufficient concern to warrant them offering any further guidelines? One of your other concerns was that inexperienced driver would go out an buy motorhomes larger than if the 3500kgs rule was kept. I suppose none of us know that would be the case but it is a possibility. However in the same way that caravanners don't all go out and buy 8foot wide twin axle caravans then it won't probable mean that all new motorhomers will go out and buy the biggest motohome they can, assuming they could afford to do so. I suspect the initial cost is quite a limiting factor for most? Some might be tempted and will probable live to regret it. The decision on what motorhome to buy has many facets, size and weight being only two.

    David

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 15,507
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic

    My main point is that while in these trade vans extra weight was needed for these batteries to carry the same payload as they did in ICE 'mode' while extra length was not needed, while in MHs extra length usually comes at the expense of extra weight. A 6m trade van is probably as safe to drive if it's 3500 or 4000 Kg? Allowing for stopping distances perhaps. While a 5-6m MH handles differently to an 8 - 9 MH I would think? And again, hopefully for the last time, that is my point. weight in a MH is directly proportional to length. Again, if the government though it was all safe, they would have allowed all ICE weights changed, they have not, they know something that we do not. Perhaps it is safety perhaps not. We can discuss all we want but there it is.

    Those two quotes were AI google generated from the rather long document that I gave a link for, just to give a favour to PD as the government's reason which PD didb't appear to know

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 14,787
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic

    @Cornersteady I am not sure your assumption that a longer motorhome is more difficult to handle, actually stands up to scrutiny. OK there is something of a learning curve when you first get a motorhome but that equally applies most vehicles and certainly if you decide on a larger caravan. Firstly motorhomes of 8 to 9 metres long are certainly available but the choice is reasonably small. 6 to 7.5 metres are much more common. I mentioned that I had owned two motorhomes over a 11 year period, one 7.5 metres long and the other 6.6metres long. I am not sure I could say the longer one was anymore demanding to drive than the shorter one. Really where the main diference is comes from is when you need to manoeuvre the vehicle in tighter spaces and obviously you have to make greater allowances when say turning left. But on the open road very little difference. I can only relate to you my own experience and perhaps it would be useful other motorhomers relate their own experiences to give you a bigger picture?

    David

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 14,787
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited February 23 #21

    Interesting short video from Motorhome Matt

    David

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 15,507
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited February 23 #22

    An extra unspecified length making turning, pulling out, parking, larger turning circles, wheels some distance behind the driver? All that not more difficult? I find that find to believe personally, especially for an inexperienced driver.

    All that extra weight as well, extra acceleration which isn't that unsafe perhaps but all that extra momentum will mean extra unexpected braking and longer stopping distances which could catch inexperienced drivers out. Again all that not more more difficult to handle?

    I'm sorry I just do not agree.

    As I keep repeating this, we can happily go over this over and over but the weight changes are not going to happen for reasons unknown. Personally I think the government are erring on the side of safety, others think otherwise but it won't make any difference until such time as the government change their minds.

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 15,507
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic

    I'm confused? This makes out that it's up to Kier S to simply give a Trump style executive order and it's done overnight? To be passed into law doesn't have to go through a few other stages or am I missing something here? Fully prepared to be educated on this?

  • DavidKlyne
    DavidKlyne Club Member Posts: 14,787
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic

    @Cornersteady I wasn't sure why he went down that rabbit hole either. What he should have probably have said was the Kier Starmer Government, or just the Government, which to me would have made more sense? As I understand it Motorhome Matt is in the trade as well as being a blogger and possibly has a close relationship with UK manufacturers. What I found interesting in his comments was that the feeling amongst those manufacturers was that the change would go through. I am in no position to know whether that is just wishful thinking or whether that comes from direct discussions with Government. We will have to wait and see?

    David

  • Cornersteady
    Cornersteady Club Member Posts: 15,507
    5,000 Likes 1000 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited April 8 #25

    The petition runs out tomorrow and as of today the total is 11,194 and unlikely to move substantially further by tomorrow. Actually my model made in February based on average rate of increase then was over 12,000 but it flatlined quite a bit despite it being raised on here and elsewhere on other multiple social media platforms.

    That figure is depending on your source of registered MHs around 3% of them. You can check your own area's constituency to see how many signatures it got. The highest in any one constituency I could find was 58 out of 99,000, A very rough average (mode) appears to be about 25 signatures per constituency of about 95,000. My own was 21 out of 96,600 or 0.02%. The map is here

    Although the end date is tomorrow the government posted their reply early, on the 23rd March assuming there wouldn't be a last minute rush I suppose, the actual reply when read in full is almost what I predicted either on this thread or the original one, but the headline reply is:

    The DfT keeps driving licence rules under review. The Government has not yet assessed the potential benefits of allowing Category B licence holders to drive motorhomes weighing up to 4,250kg.

    The full reply is here

    Interestingly the EU change would mean training and/or a test and not be automatic so perhaps they have safety concerns as well as indicated by the texts in bold?

    This change would not be automatic. EU Member States must require either at least seven hours of training, a test (which does not have to be a full driving test), or both. Any training or test must cover key safety topics set out in the Directive. There is no requirement for drivers to have held their licence for a minimum number of years before driving a motorhome.

    Although the EU did/would allow electric vehicles up to 4250 Kg it required training:

    In 2015, when the UK was still an EU Member State, countries began negotiating a temporary exemption to support the uptake of low and zero emission vehicles. This allowed Category B licence holders to drive vans weighing up to 4,250kg (instead of 3,500kg), without needing a medical, a Driver Certificate of Professional Competence (CPC), or to follow drivers’ hours rules. Drivers were required to complete five hours of training.

    In the UK this was not deemed necessary:

    In June 2025, the UK Government extended these rules through the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2025. This change allowed all zero emission vehicles to be driven on a Category B licence, removed the training requirement, and permitted these vehicles to tow a trailer.

    Personally I think that was to allow low mileage and/or stop/start delivery vans whose drivers probably already had training to be used more which makes sense for economic and green concerns, and not ICE MHs which makes sense to me as well as I described somewhere.

    So I have to say that even within MH owners the petition did not get the required support, or in fact very low support of 3%. Nationally the petition was only about 0.02%. I think the government has not taken risks with safety based on this low support and I endorse that view, while equally I endorse the view that perhaps more careful detailed research is needed before any further changes:

    The Department for Transport published its Road Safety Strategy in January 2026. It was not possible to consider alignment with the new EU Directive before the Strategy was published.

    The UK is already committed to introducing a digital driving licence. However, other changes in the Directive
    require careful consideration before decisions are made on whether to adopt them. The Government has not yet assessed the potential merits of changing Category B licence rules for motorhomes.

    Any future changes to driving licence law would be subject to
    public consultation and a full assessment of their impacts.

    Department for Transport