Damp and new construction

Qashqai66
Qashqai66 Forum Participant Posts: 551
edited March 2016 in Caravans #1

Caravan manufacturers are keen to tell us that their new construction methods mean that we no longer have damp caravans.  I have just traded in our 2014 model Xplore made by Eldiss using their SoLid construction which they claim to be totally damp proof.
 The dealer has just phoned me to say he has found damp around the front window and he will have to make a warranty claim.  I hope the Venus - built by Lunar with its traditional timber construction - may prove to be more watertight.

«1

Comments

  • Wildwood
    Wildwood Club Member Posts: 3,585
    1000 Comments 250 Likes Photogenic
    edited March 2016 #2

    The system reduces weight and some leakage problems. It still requires a complete seal to be applied as do all the new systems. From the complaints it does seem none of tbe manufacturers have got rid of human error or possibly just plain carelessness.

  • cyberyacht
    cyberyacht Forum Participant Posts: 10,218
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2016 #3

    New construction methods do not solve the damp problem merely reduce its impact as there is no wood to rot away although it presumably then looks for some other absorbent 'home' - the interior panelling.

  • Unknown
    edited March 2016 #4
    This content has been removed.
  • Qashqai66
    Qashqai66 Forum Participant Posts: 551
    edited March 2016 #5

    New construction methods do not solve the damp problem merely reduce its impact as there is no wood to rot away although it presumably then looks for some other absorbent 'home' - the interior panelling.

    Write your comments here...Not quite the case with Eldiss/Xplore as their caravans are constructed of plywood.  The new SoLid construction refers to a reduction in the use of screws and what they describe as their brilliant glue bonding system.  The dealer
    from whom we are buying our Venus - made by Lunar - is no longer an Xplore dealer as he has had so many damp problems that he got fed up with dealing with warranty claims.

  • kentman
    kentman Forum Participant Posts: 147
    edited March 2016 #6

    Agree with Wildwood.  We have had two Bailey Alutechs with no damp problems so far but no system is better than the bloke who assembles it.

  • Qashqai66
    Qashqai66 Forum Participant Posts: 551
    edited March 2016 #7

    We have had one Bailey Alutech which was fine but I have heard of others having awful damp problems with them.  We didn't get another as we didn't like either the layout or the decor of the current models.

  • xtrailman
    xtrailman Forum Participant Posts: 559
    edited March 2016 #8

    You need to buy a caravan that has woodless walls roof and floor.

    My present Alutech has all those except the latter. Only a swift Smart HT has that.

    They can still leak water but the advantage is no damp ingress, at the worst only the interior decor will be spoilt.

    Solid is just a caravan held together with no nails, so any leak will be absorbed into the walls, some other go a little further with having no wood wall battens, but then spoil it all by using wood interior wall panels, which do absorb water.

    And that includes Smart, and Smart plus.

     

  • Safeman23
    Safeman23 Forum Participant Posts: 51
    edited March 2016 #9

    Our Bailey Pegasus has a plastic inside wall so cannot absorbe water. However if the inside wall has condensation on it then a damp meter may show a high damp reading in eccess of 15%. I put the heater on for an hour wiped the wall with a dry cloth.  Down
    to about 5% around the base of the door.

  • xtrailman
    xtrailman Forum Participant Posts: 559
    edited March 2016 #10

    No service engineer will damp test an Alutech interior wall, its pointless as it will not absorb it. Only the floor must be damp tested.

  • Wildwood
    Wildwood Club Member Posts: 3,585
    1000 Comments 250 Likes Photogenic
    edited March 2016 #11

    Possibly the only caravan for you if you are paranoid about damp is the Barefoot as it is a single piece body so no joints to leak.

  • souillac
    souillac Forum Participant Posts: 17
    edited March 2016 #12

    What is the Bearfoot?

  • Qashqai66
    Qashqai66 Forum Participant Posts: 551
    edited March 2016 #13

    What is the Bearfoot?

    Write your comments here...It is not a Bearfoot but a Barefoot.  You can find it go-barefoot.co.uk.  To me it seems very expensive, remarkably impractical, too small and lacking a lot of basic items which are provided in most caravans for two thirds of the
    price: e.g. no oven, no fixed bed option etc.

  • chrisn7
    chrisn7 Forum Participant Posts: 72
    edited March 2016 #14

    Agree with Wildwood.  We have had two Bailey Alutechs with no damp problems so far but no system is better than the bloke who assembles it.

    This is the crux of the whole damp issue. Guys on piecework applying sealant by hand will remain a source of damp, until robots are used as per automotive.

  • Qashqai66
    Qashqai66 Forum Participant Posts: 551
    edited March 2016 #15

    When our dealer discovered the damp in three places in our 2014 Xplore told me of his conversations when negotiaitng the switch to Lunar from Eldiss/Xplore.  He asked about their construction and the reply was along the lines that all the manufacturers who
    have introduced new systems are still having warranty claims for damp.  Therefore they have made the decision to contiune with their timber frame and concentrate on getting the build right on the factory floor.  I have read, on other forums, of many people
    being happy with Lunar but perhaps that comment will produce a flood (appropriate word!) of comments from folk with leaking Lunars.  We are taking deliver soon so I will be watching the coming months with interest.

  • Unknown
    edited March 2016 #16
    This content has been removed.
  • rpaul
    rpaul Forum Participant Posts: 8
    edited March 2016 #17

    And my dry 2005 Dethleffs!

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2016 #18

    if you want to see the vans that survive the longest, just have a look at the brands that the long termers use, year after year...

    hymer, hobby, fendt.....any common theme....?

    ...TravelersWink

  • Qashqai66
    Qashqai66 Forum Participant Posts: 551
    edited March 2016 #19

    That may be true but, from a quick look at various web sites, I have been unable to find anything we would actually want to buy for three reasons: layout (no transverse island bed), weight and internal decor.  I find the construction of Eriba appealing.
     Would I want to travel with a caravan with no island transverse bed, no front chest with pull out table, no shower and a shortage of overhead lockers? Anser: no.

  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2016 #20

    No service engineer will damp test an Alutech interior wall, its pointless as it will not absorb it. Only the floor must be damp tested.



    ...When our alutec is serviced its only the floor level that is damp tested as its the ony wood in the van

  • Unknown
    edited March 2016 #21
    This content has been removed.
  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2016 #22

    if you want to see the vans that survive the longest, just have a look at the brands that the long termers use, year after year...

    hymer, hobby, fendt.....any common theme....?

    ...TravelersWink

    yet another sweeping, insulting generalisation.

    many vanners from all over europe, some of whom are also members of the two main clubs, 'travel' for large periods of time each year.....are you insulting all of these or just those who use a brand of van that doesnt leak?

    incidently, there are two 'l's in 'travellers'.

    to paraphrase Sybil Fawlty, "if you're going to insult someone (or a group) at least have the decency to spell it correctly."

    ..Back to your usual childish method of insults when things do not go your way , my reply was to your direct question ref common theme, where have i mentioned anything elseYell .

  • Unknown
    edited March 2016 #23
    This content has been removed.
  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2016 #24

    your insulting of vanners who use one of the brands mentioned doesnt mean that something 'has not gone my way' (whatever you mean by that), merely that you've tarred all users with your hideous bigotted 'brush'.

    the thread is one about leaking vans, not who travel in them.

    i could easily have bought a Hymer or even a Knaus in lieu of my own German van, and if i were a Hymer owner and you'd tossed your remark at me Id be letting Ro have a chat with youWink

    ..Silly boy its a well known fact who own a lot of the makes mentioned and please note the smiley with the postDon't cry

  • Unknown
    edited March 2016 #25
    This content has been removed.
  • JVB66
    JVB66 Forum Participant Posts: 22,892
    1000 Comments
    edited March 2016 #26

    now youre compunding the error.....by being personal.....

    oh, youre in for a few lashes i can tell.....Sad





    ...Keep sex out of itSurprised

  • Unknown
    edited March 2016 #27
    This content has been removed.
  • twitch
    twitch Forum Participant Posts: 52
    edited March 2016 #28

    Just to bring the debate back on track. I asked a reputable caravan repairer in the Northwest  "Which is the best caravan to buy nowadays to avoid damp" his answer was, "They get so called waterproof vans from all manufactureres in for damp repairs". His
    opinion was that one should purchase from manufacturers with the best warranty who get any necessary work done without hassle. He did tell me who that was and I will say, it hasn't been mentioned yet in this thread. He also said that the cost of repairs is
    increasing considerably because vans are getting so hard to pull apart. In a nutshell, less damp (perhaps); increased insurance and (in the retail price) warranty costs (Definitely).

  • Qashqai66
    Qashqai66 Forum Participant Posts: 551
    edited March 2016 #29

    So which is the manufacturer to which he was referring?

  • twitch
    twitch Forum Participant Posts: 52
    edited March 2016 #30

    At the time I asked the question (ie when our Elddis was in for a complete out of warranty reseal 2 years ago), it was Swift. That may have since changed. The point I'm making is that when buying a new van, research into the value of warranties and after
    care should perhaps figure more highly than the sales hype about a manufacturer's own particular brand of damp prevention technology. 

  • Wildwood
    Wildwood Club Member Posts: 3,585
    1000 Comments 250 Likes Photogenic
    edited March 2016 #31

    At the time I asked the question (ie when our Elddis was in for a complete out of warranty reseal 2 years ago), it was Swift. That may have since changed. The point I'm making is that when buying a new van, research into the value of warranties and after care should perhaps figure more highly than the sales hype about a manufacturer's own particular brand of damp prevention technology. 

    That ties in with Practical Caravans surveys as only Swift and Coachman had less than 10% in their latest survey.